Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 January 2009
The class composition of the local environment has been shown to affect both Conservative and Labour voters and type of housing has been strongly associated with the ties between class and party. Studies of contextual influences on individual political behaviour(s) have consistently shown the potent mediating effect of increasing levels of social homogeneity. In Britain, it has been demonstrated that the class–vote relationship is strengthened for the numerically dominant class as the social milieu becomes more homogeneous, while the political significance of housing policy is reflected in the relationship between differences in type of occupancy and class–party ties.
1 Tingsten, H., Political Behavior (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Bedminster Press, 1963)Google Scholar; Ennis, P. H., ‘The Contextual Dimension in Voting’, in McPhee, W. N. and Glaser, W. A., eds., Public Opinion and Congressional Elections (New York: Free Press, 1962), pp. 180–211Google Scholar; Segal, D. R. and Meyer, M. W., ‘The Social Context of Political Partisanship’, in Dogan, M. and Rokkan, S., eds., Quantitative Ecological Analysis in the Social Sciences (Boston, Mass.: MIT Press, 1969), pp. 217–32Google Scholar; Bealey, F., Blondel, J., and McCann, W. P., Constituency Politics (London: Faber, 1965), pp. 178–86Google Scholar; Fitton, Martin, ‘Neighbourhood and Voting: A Sociometric Examination’, British Journal of Political Science, in (1973), pp. 445–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Butler, D. and Stokes, D. E., Political Change in Britain, 2nd edn. (London: Macmillan, 1974). pp. 106–14, 130–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rose, R., ‘Britain: Simple Abstractions and Complex Realities’, in Rose, R., ed., Electoral Behavior: A Comparative Handbook (New York: Free Press, 1973), pp. 509–13.Google Scholar
3 Putnam, R. D., ‘Political Attitudes and the Local Community’, American Political Science Review, LX (1966), pp. 640–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Orbell, J. M., ‘An Information-Flow Theory of Community Influence’, Journal of Politics, XXXII (1970), pp. 322–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar