Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T19:21:55.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Food production — the price being paid by farm animals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

L. G. Ward*
Affiliation:
10 Queensferry Street, Edinburgh EH2 4PG
Get access

Abstract

There is varying understanding about life for farm animals. The majority of farm animals have gone from the land, only to be caged, crammed and confined behind the closed doors of the factory farm — battery hens sentenced to remain for life in wire cages, broiler chickens reared in overcrowded conditions and pigs tethered and confined in narrow stalls or in equally narrow farrowing crates. Other farm animals are sent abroad to the cruel veal crate system of continental Europe or to abattoirs where welfare standards, both during transportation and at the time of slaughter, are often appallingly low. Many of the animals slaughtered in Britain, or for the live export trade, are processed through live auction markets. A recent investigation revealed many instances of infringements of the regulations governing the treatment and welfare of animals at markets. The controversy over BSE and the cloning and genetic engineering of farm animals have all resulted in close scrutiny and inquisitions by the public into the conditions in which our farm animals are reared, treated and slaughtered. Those involved in the food industry and also those who care about the welfare of animals and recognize their sentiency must take action to ensure that the animals are reared with due thought to their behavioural needs and well being and, when the time comes, granted a quiet and humane death. For far too long in food production programmes farm animals have paid a heavy price in suffering. From birth to death, farm animals must be treated humanely and with respect.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 1993. New transport coalition formed by Aga Khan. Agscene 113: 89.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1994. Scab of more concern than journey length. The Scotsman 15 December, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1995. Secret film shows animals being mistreated. The Scotsman 9 February, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1996. The human way with animals. The Scotsman 25 March, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1996. Bad day for chickens. The Independent 17 October, London.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1998. New food chain fears over BSE. The Herald 23 April, Glasgow.Google Scholar
Baxter, M. R. 1994. The welfare problems of laying hens in battery cages. Veterinary Record 23: 614619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambell Committee. 1965. Report of the Technical Committee to Enquire into the Welfare of Animals Kept under Livestock Husbandry Systems. Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council. 1992. The extension of the Five Freedoms. 7 October, press release.Google Scholar
Gregory, N. G. and Wilkins, L. J. 1989. Broken bones in domestic fowl: handling and processing damage in end-oflay battery hens. British Poultry Science 30: 555562.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. 1964. Animal machines. Vincent Stewart, London.Google Scholar
McCoy, M. A., Reilly, G. A. C. and Kilpatrick, D. J. 1996. Density and breaking strength of bones of mortalities among cage layers. Research in Veterinary Science 60: 185186.Google Scholar
Poultry Working Group of the Productive Livestock Committee. 1994. Laying hens: twelve years of experience with new husbandry systems in Switzerland. Swiss Society for the Protection of Animals, Basel.Google Scholar
Stevenson, P. 1995. The welfare of broiler chickens. Compassion in World Farming Trust.Google Scholar