Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T13:18:46.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutritional characteristics of browse species from Northeastern Mexico consumed by small ruminants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

Roque G. Ramírez-Lozano
Roque G. Ramírez-Lozano*
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León. Apartado Postal 142, sucursal F, San Nicolás de los Garza, N.L. 66450. México
Get access

Summary

Many browse plants that grow in northeastern Mexico are consumed by domestic and wild range small ruminants. However, their nutritional value is determined by their chemical composition and digestibility. Chemical composition depends on the nature of the plant, but climatic conditions determine leaf maturity. Thus, studies to estimate the seasonality of the nutrient profiles of forages from shrubs are necessary. This paper has the objective to discuss the nutrient profiles and the organic matter digestion from the forage of 32 browse plants (13 legumes and 19 non legumes), that grow in northeastern México, and which are consumed by range small ruminants. Browses such as Acacia berlandieri (L.) Wild Acacia rigidula Benth., Ziziphus obtusifolia T and G., Desmanthus virgathus L. and Cercidium macrum I.M. Johnst. are the most abundant in the range, and also are the most selected by ruminants. The seasonal crude protein (CP) content in browse species varied within a range of 4.0 to 22.0%. The cell wall (from 24 to 53%) and its components: cellulose (from 5 to 31%) and hemicellulose (from 2 to 28%) also varied, and in most evaluated shrubs were lower than Medicago sativa hay. Seasonal lignin content also varied among plants species (from 1 to 24%; annual mean), and was higher than Medicago sativa hay. Condensed tannins were low and seasonally variable in most plants (from 0 to 23%). In general, during winter OMD (ranging from 30 to 68%) was higher than in other seasons. Lignin and condensed tannins negatively affected OMD (r = -0.40; P<0.01 and r = -0.53; P<0.001, respectively). The most selected shrubs were those with the highest tannin content. All plants were low in P and Na relative to the needs of adult goats, sheep and white-tailed deer. It is concluded that the chemical composition and OMD of browse plants were very similar among seasons. Because of their high CP, low cell wall, high mineral content and OMD in all plants, these could be considered as good protein supplements for range small grazing ruminants. However, they must be supplemented with P and Na throughout the year.

Resumen

Resumen

Muchas plantas arbustivas que crecen en el noreste de México son consumidas por pequeños rumiantes domésticos y silvestres manejados bajo sistemas extensivos. Su valor nutricional es determinado por su composición química y digestibilidad. La composición química depende de la naturaleza de la planta, aun cuando las condiciones climáticas determinan el grado de madurez del follaje. Por lo tanto, son necesarios estudios para estimar la estacionalidad del perfil nutricional del forraje proveniente de las especies arbustivas. Este escrito tiene como objetivo discutir el perfil químico y la digestibilidad de la material orgánica (DMO), proveniente del forraje de 32 plantas arbustivas (13 leguminosas y 19 no leguminosas) que crecen en el noreste de México y que son consumidas por los pequeños rumiantes en pastoreo. Plantas como: Acacia berlandieri (L.) Wild., Acacia rigidula Benth., Ziziphus obtusifolia T and G., Desmanthus virgathus L. y Cercidium macrum I.M. Johnst. son las más abundantes en el agostadero; además, son las más consumidas por los animales. El contenido estacional de proteína cruda (PC) en las arbustivas fue variable dentro de un intervalo de 4.0 a 22.0%. La pared celular y sus componentes (24 a 53%): celulosa (5 a 31%) y hemicelulosa (2 a 28%), también variaron en la mayoría de las especies evaluadas y fueron más bajas que el heno de Medicago sativa. El contenido estacional de lignina fue variable (de 1 a 24%) entre las arbustivas y fue mayor que M. sativa. Los taninos condensados fueron bajos y variables en la mayoría de las plantas (de 0 a 23%). En general, durante el invierno la DMO (68%) fue más alta que en otras estaciones. La lignina y taninos condensados afectaron negativamente la DMO (r = -0.40; P<0.01 y r = -0.53; P<0.001, respectivamente). Asimismo, los arbustos más preferidos por lo animales resultaron con el más alto contenido de taninos. Todas las plantas resultaron con bajo contenido de P y Na para satisfacer los requerimientos de cabras, borregos y venados cola blanca adultos. Se concluye que la composición química y la DMO de las especies de plantas fueron muy similares entre estaciones; además, debido al alto contenido de PC, minerales esenciales, DMO y bajo contenido de pared celular en todas las plantas, pueden ser consideradas como buenos suplementos proteicos para pequeños rumiantes manejados bajo sistemas extensivos. Sin embargo deben ser complementados con P y Na durante todo el año.

Type
Posters
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 34: Herbivores: Assessment of intake, digestibility and the roles of secondary compounds , 2006 , pp. 251 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alam, M.R. (1995). Potential use of legume tree leaves as forage in Bangladesh. Proceedings of an International Workshop: Nitrogen Fixing Trees for Fodder Production: Forest, Farm and Community Tree Research Report (FACT, net). Special Issue, pp. 205–211 Google Scholar
Foroughbakhch, R., Ramírez, R.G., Hauad, L.A., Castillo-Morales, N.E. and Moya-Rodríguez, J. (1997). Seasonal dynamics of the leaf nutrient profile of 10 native shrubs of northeastern Mexico. Forest, Farm, and Community Tree Research Reports 2: 8–12 Google Scholar
Holechek, J.L., Munshikpu, A.V., Saiwana, L., Nuñez-Hernández, G., Valdez, R., Wallace, J.D., and Cardenas, M. (1990). Influences of six shrubs diets varying in phenol content on intake and nitrogen retention by goats. Tropical Grasslands 24: 91–98 Google Scholar
Lowry, B.J., Petherman, J.R., and Tangenjaja, T. (1992). Plants fed to village ruminants in Indonesia. ACIAR, Technical Report No. 22, Canberra, p. 60Google Scholar
Mangione, A.M., Dearing, M.D. and Karasov, W.H. (2000). Interpopulation differences in tolerance to creosote bush resin in desert wood rats (Neotoma lepida). Ecology 81: 2067–2076 Google Scholar
McDowell, R.L., Conrad, J.H., Hembry, F.G., Rojas, L.X., Valle, G. and Velásquez, J. (1997). Minerales para Rumiantes en Pastoreo en Regiones Tropicales. 2a. edición. Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidad de Florida, Gainesville, Florida,Google Scholar
E.U. Norton, B.W. and Poppi, D.P. (1995). Composition and nutritional attributes of pasture legumes. In: Tropical Legumes in Animal Nutrition. Edited by J.P.F., D’Mello and Devendra, C. CAB International, pp. 23–42 Google Scholar
Ørskov, E.R. (1982). Protein Nutrition in Ruminants. Academic Press, London, EnglandGoogle Scholar
Pond, W.G, Church, D.C. and Pond, K.R. (1995). Basic Animal Nutrition and Feeding. Fourth Edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York. pp. 67–78 Google Scholar
Ramírez, R.G. (1999). Food habits and nutrition techniques of small ruminants: extensive management systems. Small Ruminant Research 34:215–220 Google Scholar
Ramírez, R.G., Mireles, E., Huerta, J.M. and Aranda, J. (1995). Food habits of range sheep grazing a buffelgrass pasture. Small Ruminant Research 17: 129–136 Google Scholar
Ramírez, R.G. (1996). Feed value of browse. Proceedings of V International Conference on Goats. International Academic Publishers, Beijing China, pp. 510–527 Google Scholar
Ramírez, R.G., Quintanilla-González, J.B. and Aranda-Ruiz, J. (1997). Diets of white-tailed deer in northeastern Mexico, Small Ruminant Research 25: 142–149 Google Scholar
Ramírez-Orduña, R., Ramírez, R.G., Gómez-Meza, M.V., Armenta-Quintana, J.A., Ramírez-Orduña, J.M., Cepeda-Palacios, R. and Ávila-Sandoval, J.M. (2003). Seasonal Dynamics of Crude Protein Digestion in browse species from Baja California Sur, Mexico. Interciencia 28: 408–415 Google Scholar
Sing, B.H., Makkar, P.S. and Negi, S.S. (1989). Rate and extend of digestion and potentially digestible dry matter and cell wall of various tress leaves. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 3233–3239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, E.J. and. Suttle, N.F. (1999). The Mineral Nutrition of Livestock, 3rd edition. CAB International, Wallingford Google Scholar
Van Soest, P.J. (1993). Cell wall matrix interactions and degradation. In: Forage Cell Wall Structure and Digestibility, Edited by Jung, H.G., Buxton, D.R. Hatfield, R.D. and Ralph, J. ASA. CSSASSSA, Madison, WI, EUA, pp. 377–401 Google Scholar