Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:42:19.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An investigation of the key factors influencing reproductive performance in dairy herds in Northern Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

C.S. Mayne ,
M. Verner ,
W.J. McCaughey ,
M.A. McCoy ,
S.D. Lennox ,
D.C. Catney ,
B. Kennedy ,
A.R.G. Wylie  and
FJ. Gordon
C.S. Mayne
Affiliation:
The Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co Down N. Ireland BT26 6DR
M. Verner
Affiliation:
The Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co Down N. Ireland BT26 6DR
W.J. McCaughey
Affiliation:
The Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co Down N. Ireland BT26 6DR
M.A. McCoy
Affiliation:
Veterinary Sciences Division
S.D. Lennox
Affiliation:
Biometrics Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland
D.C. Catney
Affiliation:
Biometrics Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland
B. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Biometrics Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland
A.R.G. Wylie
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Environmental Science Division
FJ. Gordon
Affiliation:
The Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co Down N. Ireland BT26 6DR
Get access

Abstract

Poor reproductive performance is a major problem on dairy farms across Northern Ireland and the United Kingdom (UK) as a whole, and recent studies suggest that the problem is increasing. In order to identify the key factors influencing reproductive performance at farm level, a major research initiative was established in 1998 with the objective of collating a comprehensive database on reproductive performance from 20 herds, representing over 2000 dairy cows, across Northern Ireland. Preliminary results for five herds from the first year of the study indicate a high heat detection rate (84%) across all farms. The mean intervals to first observed heat and to first service for cows calved within 19 days of the start of the breeding season were similar between herds (42.8 ± 14.0 days and 50.0 ± 11.0 days respectively). In contrast, the interval to first service for all recorded services was 89.8 ± 66.3 days and varied considerably between farms (69.9 to 112.7 days). Investigation of progesterone profiles indicates that 62.3% of cows had resumed normal cyclic activity by 40 days post calving. Of the cows with atypical ovarian patterns, 19.4% were classified as prolonged post-partum anoestrus with a further 12% exhibiting at least one post-partum prolonged luteal phase.

Type
Offered Theatre Papers
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 26 , Issue 2: Fertility in the High Producing Dairy Cow , September 2001 , pp. 323 - 329
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butler, W.R., Cherney, D.J.R. and Elrod, C.C. 1995. Milk urea nitrogen analysis : field trial results on conception rates and dietary inputs. Proceedings of the Cornell Nutrition Conference, Rochester, NY, pp. 89–95 Google Scholar
Canfield, R.W. and Butler, W.R. 1991. Energy balance, first ovulation and the effects of naloxone on LH secretion in early lactation dairy cows. Journal ofAnimal Science, 69: 740–746.Google Scholar
Darwash, A.O., Lamming, G.E. and Woolliams, A.J. 1997. Estimation of genetic variation in the interval from calving to postpartum ovulation of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 1227–1234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, J.D. 1996. Diet, production and reproduction in dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 59: 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamming, G.E. and Darwash, A.O. 1998. The use of milk progesterone profiles to characterise components of subfertility in milked dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science 52: 175–190.Google Scholar
Lamming, G.E., Darwash, A.O., Wathes, D.C. and Ball, P.J. 1998. The fertility of dairy cattle in the UK: current status and future research. Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England, 159: 82–93.Google Scholar
Macmillan, K.L., Lean, I.J. and Westwood, C.T. 1996. Australian Veterinary Journal, 73: 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, M.R., Veerkamp, R.F. and Anderson, L. 1996. Effects of genotype and feeding system as the reproductive performance of dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science, 46: 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryce, J.E., Veerkamp, R.D., Thompson, R., Hill, W.G. and Simm, G. 1997. Genetic aspects of common health disorders and measures of fertility in Holstein Friesian cattle. Animal Science, 65: 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal, M.D., Darwash, A.O. and Lamming, G.E. 1999. Is herd fertility declining in the UK? Abstracts of Dairy Cow Fertility Workshop, Westmead Hotel, Hopwood, Birmingham, 29-30 April 1999. Milk Development Council.Google Scholar