Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:03:18.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attraction of the sheep blowfly, Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae) to carrion bait in the field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

P. Fisher ,
R. Wall  and
J.R. Ashworth
P. Fisher
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol, BS8 1UG, UK
R. Wall*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol, BS8 1UG, UK
J.R. Ashworth
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol, BS8 1UG, UK
*
*Fax: 0117 925 7374 E-mail: richard.wall@bristol.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The facultative ectoparasite, Lucilia sericata (Meigen) has been described as a pioneer colonizer of carrion. This behaviour is believed to enable it to escape the intense interspecific competition which can occur between dipterous larvae within carrion. Such escape is necessary as this fly species has been thought to have reduced competitive ability, resulting from its evolutionary progression towards parasitism. In the work reported here, the attraction of L. sericata to carrion bait at different stages of decomposition (fresh to 28 days old) was investigated in the field. Trials were run over three years, with carrion bait presented in the presence and absence of sodium sulphide. Decomposition had a significant effect on the numbers of L. sericata caught; more decomposed bait caught greater numbers of L. sericata than fresh bait. However, this effect was not apparent if sodium sulphide was added to the carrion. With sodium sulphide added, there was no significant difference in the attraction of female L. sericata, regardless of bait age. There was no general relationship between carrion bait age and the number of female L. sericata caught in different stages of ovarian development. The present data, therefore, suggest that L. sericata does not act exclusively as a pioneer species. Furthermore, this work suggests that, if used with sodium sulphide, the stage of carrion bait decomposition does not significantly modify carrion bait attractiveness.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 88 , Issue 6 , December 1998 , pp. 611 - 616
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashworth, J.R. & Wall, R. (1994) Responses of the sheep blowflies, Lucilia sericata and Lucilia cuprina to odour and the development of semiochemical baits. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 8, 303–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blacklith, R.E. & Blacklith, R.M. (1990) Insect infestations of small corpses. Journal of Natural History 24, 699–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castell, C.H., Greenough, M.F. & Jenkin, N.L. (1957) The action of pseudomads on fish muscle. 2. Musty and potato-like odours. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 14, 775–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cragg, J.B. (1955) The natural history of sheep blowflies in Britain. Annals of Applied Biology 42, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denno, R.F. & Cothran, W.R. (1975) Niche relationships of a guild of necrophagous flies. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 68, 741–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, C. & Feir, D. (1991) Factors affecting the oviposition of Phaenicia sericata (Meigen) (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 64, 287–294.Google Scholar
Erzinclioglu, Y.Z. (1989) The origin of parasitism in blowflies. British Journal of Entomology and Natural History 2, 125–127.Google Scholar
Freney, M.R. (1937) Studies on the chemotropic behaviour of sheep blowflies. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Australia, Pamphlet no. 74.Google Scholar
French, N.P., Wall, R., Cripps, P.J. & Morgan, K.L. (1992) The prevalence, regional distribution and control of blowfly strike in England and Wales. Veterinary Record 131, 337–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
French, N.P., Wall, R. & Morgan, K.L. (1995) The seasonal pattern of sheep blowfly strike. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 9, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, CO. (1982) Microbial interaction with meats. pp. 225–264 in Brown, M.H. (Ed.) Meat microbiology. London, Applied Science Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. & Wall, R. (1995) Myiasis of humans and domestic animals. Advances in Parasitology 35, 258–334.Google ScholarPubMed
Hanski, I. (1976) Breeding experiments with carrion flies (Diptera) in natural conditions. Annales Entomolgica Fennici 42, 113–121.Google Scholar
Hanski, I. (1987a) Nutritional ecology of dung-and carrion-feeding insects. New York, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Hanski, I. (1987b) Colonization of ephemeral habitats. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Hanski, I. & Kuusela, S. (1980) The structure of carrion fly communities: differences in breeding seasons. Annales Zoologica Fennici 17, 185–190.Google Scholar
Holdaway, F.G. (1930) Field populations and natural control of Lucilia sericata. Nature 126, 648–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isiche, J., Hillerton, J.E. & Nowell, F. (1992) Colonization of mouse cadaver by flies in southern England. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 6, 168–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuusela, S. & Hanski, S. (1982) The structure of carrion fly communities: the size and the type of carrion. Holarctic Ecology 5, 337–348.Google Scholar
Lane, R.P. (1975) An investigation into blowfly (Diptera: Calliphoridae) succession on corpses. Journal of Natural History 9, 581–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macleod, J. (1943) A survey of British sheep blowflies. Bulletin of Entomological Research 34, 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuorteva, P. (1963) Syanthropy of blowflies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in Finland. Annales Zoologici Fennici 7, 195–198.Google Scholar
Ryan, L. & Molyneux, D.H. (1981) Non-setting adhesives for insect traps. Insect Science and its Application 1, 349–355.Google Scholar
Smith, K.E. & Wall, R. (1997a) Asymmetric competition between larvae of the blowflies Calliphora vicina and Lucilia sericata in carrion. Ecological Entomology 22, 467–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K.E. & Wall, R. (1997b) The use of carrion as breeding sites by the blowfly Lucilia sericata and other Calliphoridae. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 11, 38–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, J. & Wall, R. (1997) The evolution of ectoparasitism in the genus Lucilia (Diptera: Calliphoridae). International Journal for Parasitology 27, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vogt, W.G. & Woodburn, T.L. (1994) Effects of bait age on the number, sex, and age composition of Lucilia cupnna (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in Western Australian blowfly traps. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 34, 595–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, R. (1993) The reproductive output of the blowfly, Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae), Journal of Insect Physiology 39, 743–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, R. & Warnes, M.L. (1994) Responses of the sheep blowfly Lucilia sericata to carrion odour and carbon dioxide Entomolgia Experimentalis et Applicata 73, 239–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, R., French, N.P. & Morgan, K.L. (1992a) Blowfly species composition in sheep myiasis in Britain. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 6, 177–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wall, R., Green, C.H., French, N. & Morgan, K.L. (1992b) Development of an attractive target for the sheep blowfly Lucilta sericata. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 6, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wall, R., French, N.P. & Morgan, K.L. (1993) Predicting the abundance of the blowfly Lucilia sericata (Diptera, Calliphoridae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 83, 431–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar