Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:02:00.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ecology and control of rice planthoppers in Fiji

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Alden D. Hinckley
Affiliation:
Koronivia Research Station, Nausori, Fiji.

Extract

Observations were made in Fiji on the ecology and control of two Delphacid planthoppers on rice, Sogatella furcifera (Horv.) and Nilaparvata lugens (Stål), the latter species having apparently been responsible for a devastating outbreak in 1959. The studies covered three rice seasons, 1961, 1962, and 1963, most of the research being done at Koronivia in the south-eastern part of Viti Levu. Samples were taken of planthoppers and their natural enemies in dryland (drilled) and wetland (transplanted) rice, as well as in rice seed-beds and areas with grass or mixed rice and grass. Insecticides applied at standard dosages were tested against the planthoppers.

It was shown that S. furcifera was most common on young rice and that N. lugens predominated on older rice. Sogatella kolophon (Kirk.), long placed in the genus Sogata and confused with Sogatella furcifera, was abundant only in grassy areas. Populations of N. lugens and, to a lesser extent, of S. furcifera, were apt to reach damaging levels on transplanted rice growing in pools of standing water after a dry period. In drilled fields, the predatory Mirid Cyrtorhinus lividipennis vitiensis Usinger provided effective control by destroying eggs of N. lugens, and, by the time the rice was six months old, it usually outnumbered the females of N. lugens. Parasitism of planthopper eggs by Mymarids, Trichogrammatids, and Eulophids was very low. Parasitism of adults of S. furcifera and S. kolophon by Elenchid Strepsipterons averaged about ten per cent, and that by Dryinid wasps less than one per cent. Adults of N. lugens were virtually free from parasitism but were sometimes infected by fungi. Factors influencing outbreaks are discussed. These include the amount of rainfall, the type of cultivation, the age of the rice crop, the species composition of the planthopper populations, and the relative abundance of Cyrtorhinus.

Insecticidal concentrates tested against both S. furcifera and N. lugens included malathion 50 per cent, emulsifiable concentrate, diazinon 20 per cent, e.c., Bogor 30 per cent, e.c., DDT 20 per cent, e.c., dieldrin 15 per cent, e.c., and Sevin 80 per cent, wettable powder. Dieldrin-resistant strains of N. lugens appeared during 1961, the third season in which dieldrin and BHC had been widely used. The other five materials gave good results, DDT being the least expensive and the most persistent, although it took more than 24 hours to reduce the plant-hopper populations. It was concluded that rice should be closely watched from its third to the end of its sixth month and that 50 oz. of DDT 20 per cent. e.c. in 50 gallons of water per acre, or an equivalent formulation of some other insecticide, should be sprayed on the rice stems if the planthopper density should exceed 10 per stem. Other possible measures for controlling rice planthoppers would include the introduction of Dryinid wasps parasitising N. lugens, the development of rice varieties resistant to planthopper attacks, and the use of controlled flooding in high-bunded fields, but on present evidence the first two appear to hold little promise of success.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bohart, R. M. (1941). A revision of the Strepsiptera with special reference to the species of North America.—Univ. Calif. Publ. Ent. 7 pp. 91159.Google Scholar
Caresche, L. (1933). Note sur les insectes appelés “ pucerons du riz ” dans le sud-indochinois et les moyens de lutte à leur opposer.—Bull. econ. Indochine 36 pp. 488510. (Rev. appl. Ent. (A) 22 pp. 16–17.)Google Scholar
Carvalho, J. C. M. & Southwood, T. R. E. (1955). Revisão do complexo Cyrtorhinus Fieber – Mecomma Fieber (Hemiptera-Heteroptera, Miridae). [In English.]Bol. Mus. paraense E. Goeldi 11 pp. 172.Google Scholar
Esaki, T. & Hashimoto, S. (1930). Report on the leaf-hoppers injurious to the rice plant and their natural enemies. [In Japanese.]Publ. Kyushu imp. Univ. Dep. Agric. no. 1 (1929), 30 pp. (R.A.E. (A) 18 pp. 555–556.)Google Scholar
Esaki, T. & Hashimoto, S. (1936). Report on the leaf-hoppers injurious to the rice plant and their natural enemies, no. 7 (for the year 1935). [In Japanese.]—31 pp. Fukuoka, Dep. Agric. Kyushu Univ.(R.A.E. (A) 24 p. 465.)Google Scholar
Esaki, T. & Sameshima, T. (1940). Report on the leaf-hoppers injurious to the rice plant and their natural enemies, no. 11 (for the year 1939). [In Japanese.]—42 pp. Fukuoka, Dep. Agric. Kyushu Univ.(R.A.E. (A)29 p. 101.)Google Scholar
Fennah, R. G. (1956). Homoptera: Fulgoroidea.—Insects of Micronesia 6 no. 3 pp. 39211.Google Scholar
Fennah, R. G. (1963). The Delphacid species-complex known as Sogata furcifera (Horváth) (Homoptera: Fulgoroidea).—Bull. ent. Res. 54 pp. 4579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuda, K. (1934). Studies on Liburnia oryzae Mats. [In Japanese.]Bull. Govt Res. Inst. Formosa no. 99, 19 pp. (R.A.E. (A) 22 pp. 518–519.)Google Scholar
Kawada, A., Kato, S., Mukoo, H. & Fukunaga, K. (1954). Insects and diseases of rice plants in Japan.—Bull. nat. Inst. agric. Sci. [Nishigahara] 33 pp.Google Scholar
Kisimoto, R. (1959). On the stages susceptible to the effect of crowding determining the wing-forms in the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens Stål. [In Japanese.]Jap. J. Ecol. 9 pp. 9497.(R.A.E. (A) 49 p. 560.)Google Scholar
Lever, R. J. A. W. (1939). Entomological notes. 2. The rice leaf-hopper.—Agric. J. Fiji 10 pp. 8384.Google Scholar
Lever, R. J. A. W. (1946). Insect pests in Fiji.—Bull. Dep. Agric. Fiji no. 23, 36 pp.Google Scholar
Miller, N. C. E. & Pagden, H. T. (1930). Insect pests of padi in Malaya.—Malay, agric. J. 18 pp. 289292.Google Scholar
Muir, F. (1906). Notes on some Fijian insects.—Bull. Hawaii. Sug. Ass. ent. Ser. no. 2, 11 pp.Google Scholar
Murata, T. & Hirano, I. (1932). Relation of outbreaks of leafhoppers to climatic conditions. [In Japanese.]J. Pl Prot. 19 pp. 2024, 103108, 183190. (R.A.E. (A) 20 p. 380.)Google Scholar
New Zealand Meteorological Service (1962). Table of average rainfall at various stations in Fiji, Tonga and Western Pacific High Commission Territories to the end of 1960.—Extract from Fiji roy. Gaz. no. 20, 9 pp.Google Scholar
O'Connor, B. A. (1952). The rice leaf hopper, Sogata furcifera kolophon Kir-kaldy, and “ rice yellows ”.—Agric. J. Fiji 23 pp. 97104.Google Scholar
Pagden, H. T. (1934). Notes on hymenopterous parasites of padi pests in Malaya.—Sci. Ser. Dep. Agric. S.S. & F.M.S. no. 15, 13 pp.Google Scholar
Perkins, R. C. L. (1906). Leaf-hoppers and their natural enemies (pt. x. Dryinidae, Pipunculidae), supplementary.—Bull. Hawaii. Sug. Ass. ent. Ser. no. 1 pp. 481499.Google Scholar
Pierce, W. D. (1961). A new genus and species of Strepsiptera parasitic on a leafhopper vector of a virus disease of rice and other Gramineae.—Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 54 pp. 467474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakai, K. (1940). Biology and control methods of autumn leaf-hoppers. [In Japanese.]—J. Pl. Prot. 27 pp. 694702. (R.A.E. (A) 29 p. 98.)Google Scholar
Shibuya, M. (1956). Effect of organic phosphorous insecticides applied for rice stem borer control on the leafhopper-association in paddy fields. [In Japanese.]Mem. Fac. Agric. Kagoshima 2 pp. 145152. (R.A.E. (A) 47 p. 471.)Google Scholar
Swezey, O. H. (1936). Biological control of the sugar cane leafhopper in Hawaii. Bull. Hawaii. Sug. Ass. ent. Ser. no. 21 pp. 57101.Google Scholar
Usinger, R. L. (1951). A revised classification of Pacific island Cyrtorhinus with a new species from Fiji (Hemiptera, Miridae).—Comment. biol., Helsingf. 12 pt. 8, 5 pp.Google Scholar
Watson, J. M. (1960). Department of Agriculture annual report for the year 1959.—Fiji Leg. Coun. Pap. no. 21 (1960), 24 pp.Google Scholar