Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:21:45.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field studies on irradiated Glossina morsitans morsitans Westwood (Diptera: Glossinidae) from a colony maintained on a Membrane-Feeding regimen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. Weiss  and
W. Takken
M. Weiss
Affiliation:
Laboratory of the joint FAO/IAEA Division, P.O. Box 590, A-1011 Vienna, Austria
W. Takken
Affiliation:
Laboratory of the joint FAO/IAEA Division, P.O. Box 590, A-1011 Vienna, Austria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a field study in eastern Tanzania, the behaviour of 4167 males and females of Glossina morsitans morsitans Westw. from a colony fed on equine blood through artificial membranes (Seibersdorf flies) was compared to that of 4065 flies from a colony fed on goats or rabbits (Tanga flies). All flies had been treated with 11·8 krad γ-irradiation, a sterilising does, in the late puparial stage in a saturated nitrogen atmosphere. Recapture rates were 5·66% for Seibersdorf and 4·50% for Tanga flies. Only 57% as many Tanga females were recaptured as compared to Seibersdorf females, but the Tanga females had a higher insemination rate. The age-distribution and dispersal of the recaptured flies of the males of both groups and of the females were similar. Laboratory studies showed that although there were no marked differences in fat reserves between males of the Tanga and the Seibersdorf strains, the Seibersdorf females had significantly more fat than the Tanga females.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 70 , Issue 2 , June 1980 , pp. 221 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauer, B. & Wetzel, H. (1976). A new membrane for feeding Glossina morsitans Westw. (Diptera, Glossinidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 65, 563–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bursell, E.. (1959). The water balance of tsetse flies.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 111, 205–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, D. L. (1977). Quality control in mass rearing.—A. Rev. Ent. 22, 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuisance, D., Politzar, H., Clair, M., Sellin, E. & Taze, Y. (1978). Impact des löchers de möles stériles sur les niveaux de deux populations sauvages de Glossina palpalis gambiensis en Haute-Volta (sources de la Volta Noire).—Revue Élev. Méd. vét. Pays trop. 31, 315–328.Google Scholar
Dame, D. A. & Williamson, D. L. (1979). Progress with the sterile insect technique for Glossina morsitans control.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 73, 133.Google Scholar
Dame, D. A., Williamson, D. L., Cobb, P. E., Gates, D. B., Warner, P. V., Mtuya, A. G. & Baumgartner, H. (in press). Integration of sterile insects and pesticides for the control of the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans morsitans.—Paper presented at the “International Symposium on the Use of Isotopes for Research and Control of Vectors of Animal Diseases, Host Pathogen Relationships and the Environmental Impact of Control Procedures”, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 7–11 05 1979.Google Scholar
Ford, J., Glasgow, J. P., Johns, D. L. & Welch, J. R. (1959). Transect fly-rounds in field studies of Glossina.—Bull. ent. Res. 50, 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G. A., Hargrove, J. W., Jordan, A. M., Langley, P. A. & Mews, A. R. (1976). Survival and behaviour of tsetse flies (Diptera, Glossinidae) released in the field: a comparison between wild flies and animal-fed and in vitro-fed laboratory-reared flies.—Bull. ent. Res. 66, 731–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetzel, H. & Luger, D. (1978). In vitro feeding in the rearing of tsetse flies (Glossina m. morsitans and G. p. palpalis, Diptera: Glossinidae).—Tropenmed. Parasit. 29, 239–251.Google Scholar