Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-02T04:47:08.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Habitat associations and seasonal abundance of coprophilous coleoptera (Staphylinidae, Hydrophilidae and Histeridae) in the Hluhluwe region of South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Adrian L. V. Davis ,
Bernard M. Doube  and
Paul D. McLennan
Adrian L. V. Davis
Affiliation:
CSIRO Dung Beetle Research Unit, Pretoria, South Africa
Bernard M. Doube
Affiliation:
CSIRO Dung Beetle Research Unit, Pretoria, South Africa
Paul D. McLennan
Affiliation:
CSIRO Dung Beetle Research Unit, Pretoria, South Africa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A total of 134 species of Coleoptera (100 of staphylinids, 13 of hydrophilids and 21 of histerids) was extracted from pads of cattle dung placed in four contrasting habitats in both Hluhluwe Game Reserve, Natal, South Africa, and the surrounding pastoral regions. Pads were exposed to colonists for 24 h on eight occasions over one year. Forty-six species and species complexes were captured in numbers sufficient to permit analysis of their distribution patterns. Of 27 species significantly influenced by vegetation type, 22 were more abundant in unshaded situations and five more abundant in situations shaded by high profile vegetation. The total numbers of individual predatory staphylinids were evenly distributed between vegetation types, but members of coprophagous staphylinid and other predatory taxa were more numerous in unshaded situations. Of 13 species significantly influenced by soil type, six were more abundant on clay and seven more abundant on deep sand. The total numbers of individual coprophagous oxyteline staphylinids were greater on clay than on sand, but the members of predatory taxa, including staphylinids, were evenly distributed across soil types. Of 14 species showing significant seasonal changes in abundance, 13 were more abundant in hot wet months and one in cool dry months. The total numbers of hydrophilid individuals were greater in the cool dry season, but the other taxa were active predominantly in the rainy season. Most species were present in similar numbers in both the game reserve and pastoral regions. Enclosure of dung pads within wiremesh cones to exclude large dung-burying beetles resulted in reduced colonization by most beetle species regardless of their size.

Type
Original Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 78 , Issue 3 , September 1988 , pp. 425 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blume, R. R., Kunz, S. E., Hogan, B. F. & Matter, J. J. (1970). Biological and ecological investigations of horn flies in central Texas: influence of other insects in cattle manure.—J. econ. Ent. 63, 1121–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourne, J. R. & Hays, K. L. (1968). Effects of temperature on predation of horn fly larvae by the larvae of Sphaeridium scarabaeoides.—J. econ. Ent. 61, 321–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doube, B. M. (1983). The habitat preference of some bovine dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Hluhluwe Game Reserve, South Africa.—Bull. ent. Res. 73, 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doube, B. M. (1986). Biological control of the buffalo fly in Australia: the potential of the southern African dung fauna.—pp. 16–34 in Patterson, R. S. & Rutz, D. A. (Eds). Biological control of muscoid flies.—Misc. Publs ent. Soc. Am. no. 61, 174 pp.Google Scholar
Doube, B. M. & Huxham, K. A. (1987). Laboratory assessment of predation on immature stages of Haematobia thirouxi potans (Bezzi) (Diptera: Muscidae) by some beetles from the southern African dung fauna.—J. ent. Soc. sth. Afr. 50, 475–480.Google Scholar
Fay, H. A. C. & Doube, B. M. (1983). The effect of some coprophagous and predatory beetles on the survival of immature stages of the African buffalo fly, Haematobia thirouxi potans, in bovine dung.—Z. angew. Ent. 95, 460–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincher, G. T. (1973). Nidification and reproduction of Phanaeus spp. in three textural classes of soil (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae).—Coleopt. Bull. 27, 33–37.Google Scholar
Hanski, I. & Koskela, H. (1977). Niche relations among dung-inhabiting beetles.—Oecologia (Berl.) 28, 203–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, R. L. & Oliver, L. M. (1979). Predation of Philonthus flavolimbatus on the horn fly.—Environ. Entomol. 8, 259–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howden, H. F. & Nealis, V. G. (1975). Effects of clearing in a tropical rain forest on the composition of the coprophagous scarab beetle fauna (Coleoptera).—Biotropica 7, 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, J. S. III, Bay, D. E. & Fincher, G. T. (1986). A survey of Staphylinidae associated with cattle droppings in Burleson County, Texas.—Southwest. Entomologist 11, 83–88.Google Scholar
Key, R. S. (1982). Cluster analysis of dung inhabiting beetle communities from different altitudes in Jostedalen, south-west Norway.—Fauna norv. (B) 29, 24–33.Google Scholar
Koskela, H. (1972). Habitat selection of dung-inhabiting staphylinids (Coleoptera) in relation to age of the dung.—Ann. Zool. Fenn. 9, 156–171.Google Scholar
Koskela, H. & Hanski, I. (1977). Structure and succession in a beetle community inhabiting cow dung.—Ann. Zool. Fenn. 14, 204–223.Google Scholar
Landin, B. O. (1961). Ecological studies on dung-beetles (Col. Scarabaeidae).—Opusc. ent. Suppl. no. 19, 227 pp.Google Scholar
Lumaret, J. P. (1980). Analyse des communautés de scarabéidés coprophages dans le maquis Corse et étude de leur rôle dans l'utilisation des excréments.—Ecol. mediterr. 5, 51–58.Google Scholar
Lumaret, J. P. (1983). Structure des peuplements de coprophages Scarabaeidae en région méditerranéenne française: relations entre les conditions écologiques et quelques paramètres biologiques des espèces (Col.).—Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. 88, 481–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macqueen, A. & Beirne, B. P. (1975). Influence of other insects on production of horn fly, Haematobia irritans (Diptera: Muscidae), from cattle dung in south-central British Columbia.—Can. Ent. 107, 1255–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainio, M. (1966). Abundance and phenology of some coprophagous beetles in different kinds of dung.—Ann. Zool. Fenn. 3, 88–98.Google Scholar
Roth, J. P. (1982). Predation on the horn fly, Haematobia irritans (L.), by three Philonthus species.—Southwest. Entomologist 7, 26–30.Google Scholar
Roth, J. P. (1983). Compatibility of coprophagous scarabs and fimicolous staphylinids as biological control agents of the horn fly, Haematobia irritans (L.) (Diptera: Muscidae).—Environ. Entomol. 12, 124–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerlin, J. W., Bay, D. E., Stafford, K. C. III & Hunter, J. S. III (1984). Laboratory observations on the life cycle and habits of Hister abbreviatus (Coleoptera: Histeridae).—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 77, 543–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, G. D. & Morgan, C. E. (1972). Field-mortality studies of the immature stages of the horn fly in Missouri.—Environ. Entomol. 1, 453–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, H. & Lieth, H. (1964). Klimadiagram-Weltatlas. Part 2. Jena, Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, D. F. (1974). The biological control of dung.—Scient. Am. 230, 100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weather Bureau (undated). Rainfall statistics.—in Climate of South Africa.—197 pp. Pretoria, Government Printer (WB20, Part 2).Google Scholar