Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:12:29.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hyperparasitism in two newly introduced parasitoids, Epidinocarsis lopezi and Gyranusoidea tebygi (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) after their establishment in Togo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

U. Agricola  and
H.U. Fischer
U. Agricola*
Affiliation:
Institut für Phytopathologie und Angewandte Entomologie, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Giessen, Germany
H.U. Fischer
Affiliation:
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), BP1263, Cacaveli, DELomé, Togo
*
Dr U. Agricola, Institut für Phytopathologie und Angewandte Entomologie, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Ludwigstr. 23, 6300 Giessen, Germany.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1988/89 the nature and degree of hyperparasitism in two newly introduced parasitoids of exotic mealybug plant pests were examined in Togo. Associated with Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) (cassava mealybug) five indigenous hymenopterous hyperparasitoids were found adapted to the primary parasitoid Epidinocarsis lopezi (De Santis): Chartocerus sp. A (Signiphoridae), Prochiloneurus insolitus (Alam), P. aegyptiacus (Mercet) (Encyrtidae), Tetrastichus sp. (Eulophidae), and Marietta leopardina Motschulsky (Aphelinidae). The rate of hyperparasitism varied considerably (20–90%). At one sampling site Chartocerus sp. A was most frequent (52%), at the other site P. insolitus was found to dominate (55%). The same hyperparasitoids were associated with Rastrococcus invadens Williams (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), but with an additional Chartocerus (sp. B). Hyperparasitism ranged from 56 to 86%, with Chartocerus sp. A being the most important species. Multiple parasitism was observed on several occasions. In spite of generally high hyperparasitism, no detrimental effect on the control efficiency of either primary parasitoid was noticed.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 81 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 127 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agounké, D., Agricola, U. & Bokonon-Ganta, H.A. (1988) Rastrococcus invadens Williams (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), a serious exotic pest of fruit trees and other plants in West Africa. Bulletin of Entomological Research 78, 695–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agricola, U., Agounké, D., Fischer, H.U. & Moore, D. (1989) The control of Rastrococcus invadens Williams (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Togo by the introduction of Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 79, 671–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, van den, R. (1981) Specificity in hyperparasites. pp. 22–33 in Rosen, D. (Ed.) The role of hyperparasitism in biological control: a symposium. University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences, Priced Publication 4103.Google Scholar
Boussienguet, J. (1986) Le complexe entomophage de la cochenille du manioc, Phenacoccus manihoti (Horn. Coccoidea Pseudococcidae) au Gabon. 1) — Inventaire faunistique et relations trophiques. Annales de la Societé Entomologique de France (Nouvelle Série) 22, 35–44.Google Scholar
Burton, L.D. & Starks, K.J. (1977) Control of a primary parasite of the greenbug with a secondary parasite in greenhouse screening for plant resistance. Journal of Economic Entomology 70, 219–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CIBC. (1989) Biological control of Rastrococcus invadens Williams. Report for 1989. 39pp. Unpublished Report of the C.A.B. International Institute of Biological Control, Ascot, Berks., UK.Google Scholar
Fabres, G. & Matile-Ferrero, D. (1980) Les entomophages inféodés à la cochenille du manioc, Phenacoccus manihoti (Horn. Coccoidea Pseudococcidae) en République Populaire du Congo. 1) Les composantes de l'entomoccoenose aet leurs interrelations. Annales de la Societé Entomologique de France (Nouvelle Série) 16, 509–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goergen, G. (1988) On the bionomics of hyperparasitoids of the cassava-mealybug (Phenacoccus manihoti). Annual Report 1988.11 pp. Contonoú, République Populaire du Bénin, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Programme de Lutte Biologique.Google Scholar
Hammond, W.N.O., Neuenschwander, P. & Herren, H.R. (1987) Impact of the exotic parasitoid Epidinocarsis lopezi on cassava mealybug (Phenacoccus manihoti) populations. Insect Science and its Application 8, 887–891.Google Scholar
Hayat, M. (1974) On some Indian species of Aphelinidae, with a description of a new Coccophagus (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea), Journal of Natural History (London) 8, 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herren, H.R., Neuenschwander, P., Hennessey, R.D. & Hammond, W.N.O. (1987). Introduction and dispersal of Epidinocarsis lopezi (Hym., Encyrtidae), an exotic parasitoid of the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti (Horn., Pseudococcidae), in Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 19, 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffaker, C.B., Simmonds, J.M. & Laing, J.E. (1976) The theoretical and empirical basis of biological control, pp. 42–78 in Huffaker, C.B. & Messenger, P.C. (Eds) Theory and practice of biological control. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kfir, R., Podoler, H. & Rosen, D. (1976) The area of discovery and searching strategy of a primary parasite and two hyperparasites. Ecological Entomology 1, 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luck, R.F., Messenger, P.S. & Barbieri, J.F. (1981) The influence of hyperparasitism on the performance of biological control. pp 34–42 in Rosen, D. (Ed) The role ofhyperparasitm in biological control: a symposium. University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences, Priced Publication 4103.Google Scholar
Matile-Ferrero, D. (1977) Une cochenille nouvelle nuisible au manioc en Afrique équatoriale, Phenacoccus manihoti n. sp. (Homoptera, Coccoidea, Pseudococcidae). Annales de la Societé Entomologique de France (Nouvelle Serie) 13, 145–152.Google Scholar
Narasimham, U.A. & Chacko, M.J. (1988) Rastrococcus spp. (Hemiptera: Pseudoccidae) and their natural enemies in India as potential control agents for R. invadens Williams. Bulletin of Entomological Research 78, 703–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuenschwander, P. & Hammond, W.N.O. (1988) Natural enemy activity following the introduction of Epidinocarsis lopezi (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) against the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in Southwestern Nigeria. Environmental Entomology 17, 894–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuenschwander, P., Hennessey, R.D. & Herren, H.R. (1987) Food web of insects associated with the cassava mealybug, Phenacooccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), and its introduced parasitoid, Epidinocarsis lopezi (De Santis) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), in Africa. Bulletin of Entomological Research 77, 177–189.Google Scholar
Neuenschwander, P.Hammond, W.N.O., Gutierrez, A.P.Cudjoe, A.R., Adjakloe, R., Baumgärtner, J.U. & Regev, U. (1989) Impact assessment of the biological control of the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-ferrero (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), by the introduced parasitoid Epidinocarsis lopezi (De Santis) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 79, 579–594.Google Scholar
Nwanze, K.F. (1982) Relationships between cassava root yields and infestations by the mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti. Tropical Pest Management 28, 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar