Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T10:00:06.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the biting activities of some anthropophilic Amazonian Simuliidae (Diptera)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

L. A. Lacey  and
J. D. Charlwood
L. A. Lacey
Affiliation:
Divisão de Ciências Médicas, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
J. D. Charlwood
Affiliation:
Divisão de Ciências Médicas, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Quantitative observations on the biting activities of Simulium simplicicolor Lutz and S. sanguineum Knab s.1. at Aripuanã, Mato Grosso, Brazil, and S. guianense Wise and S. sanguineum s.1. at Uru´, Par´, were made during the wet and dry seasons between June 1978 and August 1979. The species demonstrated characteristic attacking patterns regardless of abundance or environmental conditions. S. simplicicolor, S. guianense and S. sanguineum s.1. at Uruá demonstrated bimodal biting patterns with early morning and late afternoon peaks. S. sanguineum s.1. at Aripuanã, however, bit throughout the day with three peaks of activity. Evidence is presented for circadian control of the biting patterns which are subject to modification by exogenous factors outside of an optimal range. S. simplicicolor seemed to be most affected by light intensity, whereas the other species were affected by variable combinations of light, temperature and humidity depending on the species and population. Physiological age sometimes also modified biting activity in S. simplicicolor. This variable was not studied in the other species. S. simplicicolor and S. guianense preferred biting man on the legs and S. sanguineum s.1. at Uruá preferred the upper torso, but S. sanguineum s.1. at. Aripuanã did not demonstrate a consistent preference for sites above or below the waist. Average engorgement times for all of the populations except the Uruá population of S. sanguineum s.1. were between 4·3 and 5·3 min.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , September 1980 , pp. 495 - 509
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alverson, D. R. & Noblet, R. (1976). Response of female black flies to selected meteorological factors.—Environ. Entomol. 5, 662–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. R. & DeFoliart, G. R. (1961). Feeding behavior and host preferences of some black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) in Wisconsin.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 54, 716–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellec, C. (1977). Analyse des signaux intervenant dans la recherche de ’hote chez Simulium damnosum s.1.—Colloques Int. Cent. natn. Rech. scient. no. 265, 241–250.Google Scholar
Brady, J. (1975). Circadian changes in central excitability—the origin of behavioural rhythms in tsetse flies and other animals?—J. Ent. (A) 50, 79–95.Google Scholar
Christophers, S. R. (1911). The development of the egg-follicle in anophelines.—Paludism 2, 73–89.Google Scholar
Collins, R. C. (1979). Onchocerciasis transmission potentials of four species of Guatemalan Simuliidae.—Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 28, 72–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crosskey, R. W. (1962). Observations on the uptake of human blood by Simulium damnosum: the engorgement time and size of the blood-meal.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 56, 141–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalmat, H. T. (1955). The black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) of Guatemala and their role as vectors of onchocerciasis.—Smithson. misc. Collns. 125, 425 pp.Google Scholar
Datta, M. & Dasgupta, B. (1974). Studies on the nocturnal periodicity of six species of black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) at Darjeeling, West Bengal.—Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. B79, 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detinova, T. S. (1962). Age-grouping methods in Diptera of medical importance with special reference to some vectors of malaria.—Monograph Ser. WHO no. 47, 216 pp.Google ScholarPubMed
Disney, R. H. L. (1972). Observations on chicken-biting blackflies in Cameroon with a discussion of parous rates of Simulium damnosum.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 66, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duke, B. O. L. (1968). Studies on factors influencing the transmission of onchocerciasis. IV.—The biting-cycles, infective biting density and transmission potential of ‘forest’ Simulium damnosum.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 62, 95–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duke, B. O. L. (1975). The differential dispersal of nuliparous and parous Simulium damnosum.—Tropenmed. Parasit. 26, 88–97.Google Scholar
Duke, B. O. L. & Beesley, W. N. (1958). The vertical distribution of Simulium damnosum bites on the human body.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 52, 274–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El Bashir, S., El Jack, M. H. & El Hadi, H. M. (1976). The diurnal activity of the chicken-biting black fly, Simulium griseicolle Becker (Diptera: Simuliidae) in Northern Sudan.—Bull. ent. Res. 66, 481–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallis, A. M. (1964). Feeding and related behavior of female Simuliidae (Diptera).—Expl. Farasit. 15, 439–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garms, R. (1975). Observations on filarial infections and parous rates of anthropophilic black-flies in Guatemala, with reference to the transmission of Onchocerca volvulus.—Tropenmed. Parasit. 26, 169–182.Google Scholar
Guttman, D. (1972). The biting activity of black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) in three types of habitats in Western Colombia.—J. Med. Entomol. 9, 269–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mer, G. G. (1936). Experimental study on the development of the ovary in Anopheles elutus, Edw. (Dipt. Culic.).—Bull. ent. Res. 27, 351–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moraes, M. A. P. & Chaves, G. M. (1974). Onchocerciasis in Brazil: new findings among the Yanomama Indians.—Bull. Pan. Am. Hlth Org. 8, 95–99.Google ScholarPubMed
Moraes, M. A. P., Almeida, M. M. R., Lovelace, J. K. & Chaves, G. M. (1978). Mansonella ozzardi entre indios Ticunas do estado do Amazonas, Brasil.—Boln of. sanit. pan-am. 85, 16–25.Google Scholar
Moraes, M. A. P., Shelley, A. J., Calheiros, L. B. & Porto, M. A. S. (in press). Estado atual do conhecimento sobre os focos brasileiros de oncocercose.—Anais bras. Derm.Google Scholar
RamÍrez-Pérez, J., Rassi, E., Convit, J. & Ramirez, A. (1977). Indice de infection natural de Simulium metallicum (Diptera: Simuliidae) por formas evolutivas de Onchocerca volvulus en Venezuela.—Boln Of. sanit. pan-am. 82, 322–326.Google ScholarPubMed
Read, R. G., Adames, A. J. & Galindo, P. (1978). A model of microenvironment and man-biting tropical insects.—Environ. Entomol. 7, 547–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, D. S. (1976). Insect clocks.—279 pp. Oxford, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Shelley, A. J. (1975). A preliminary survey of the prevalence of Mansonella ozzardi in some rural communities on the river Purus, state of Amazonas, Brazil.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 69, 407–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shelley, A. J. & Shelley, A. (1976). Further evidence for the transmission of Mansonella ozzardi by Simulium amazonicum in Brazil.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 70, 213–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shelley, A. J., Nunes de Mello, J. A. S. & Rees, R. G. O. (1976). Observações preliminares sobre a transmissão de oncocercose no rio Toototobi, Amazonas, Brasil.—Acta Amazôonica 6, 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelley, A. J., Pinger, R. R., Moraes, M. A. P., Charlwood, J. D. & Hayes, J. (1979 a). Vectors of Onchocerca volvulus at the River Toototobi, Brazil.—J. Helminth. 53, 41–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shelley, A. J., Pinger, R. R., Moraes, M. A. P. & Hayes, J. (1979 b). Concentraction of microfilariae of Onchocerca volvulus by Simulium sanguineum during feeding: use in mapping parasite distribution in the skin.—J. med. Entomol. 16, 48–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shôgaki, Y. & Yoshida, Y. (1956). Studies on the black flies of Yase District in Kyoto-City and their control. I. Notes on the diurnal rhythm of biting activity of Simulium (Gnus) nacojapi Smart (Simuliidae, Diptera) [in Japanese].—Jap. J. sanit. Zool. 7, 38–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, B. H. (1976 a). Studies on the attraction of Simulium damnosum s.1. (Diptera: Simuliidae) to its hosts. II.The nature of substances on the human skin responsible for attractant olfactory stimuli.—Tropenmed Parasit. 27, 83–90.Google Scholar
Thompson, B. H. (1976 b). Studies on the attraction of Simulium damnosum s.1. (Diptera: Simuliidae) to its hosts. I. The relative importance of sight, exhaled breath, and smell.—Tropenmed. Parasit. 27, 455–473.Google ScholarPubMed
Underhill, G. W. (1940). Some factors influencing feeding activity of simuliids in the field.—J. econ. Ent. 33, 915–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellington, W. G. (1974). Black-fly activity during cumulus-induced pressure fluctuations.—Environ. Entomol. 3, 351–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. B. (1964). Nocturnal activity of black flies (Simuliidae).—Nature. Lond. 201, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, L. S. & Peterson, D. G. (1960). Diurnal behavior and biting habits of black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) in the forests of Quebec.—Can. J. Zool. 38, 489–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar