Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T13:26:38.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Penetration of Insect Egg-shells

II.—The Properties and Permeability of Sub-chorial Membranes during Development of Rhodnius prolixus, Stål

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. W. L. Beament
J. W. L. Beament
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council, Unit of Insect Physiology, Department of Zoology, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During development, membranes are added to the inner surface of the chorion in eggs of Rhodnius prolixus. The chemistry and permeability of the membranes have been investigated.

A true fertilisation membrane is produced immediately before oviposition when the egg is fertilised. It is attached to the inner surface of the primary wax layer, recessed into the micropylar region and covers the whole inner surface of the shell.

The membrane is very thin when first formed. It is colourless, comparatively resistant to solvents and apparently composed of “vulcanised” protein. It is semi-permeable to salt solutions but made very permeable to small molecules when immersed in absolute alcohols.

In the following five days of incubation, further material is added to the fertilisation membrane. Over the main part of the shell and cap, this does not cause a great increase in the thickness of the, membrane. The added material is probably proteinaceous, with tanning- and vulcanising substances and it is mostly a product of the serosa.

Opposite the inner openings of the micropyles, material is accumulated at a much greater rate and by six days incubation the membrane may be fifteen microns thick. The inner surface of the egg-shell thus becomes a uniformly ellipsoidal body. The thickened material has been called the epembryonic ring.

At about the, sixth day of incubation, shortly before blastokinesis, the membrane is partially impregnated with a high-melting-point wax. This raises the “transition point” in the egg's water-loss/temperature curve from 42·5°C. to 68°C. Evidence is against this material being arranged as a second wax layer on the inner surface of the membrane.

No further changes were detected until the thirteenth day when the innermost part of the membranes are broken down by the embryo. On the day before eclosion the embryo is surrounded by a liquid containing emulsified wax and proteinaceous material. The properties of the membranes return towards those of the one-day-old egg but do not attain them ; the egg hatches on the 16th day.

The changes in the membranes produce considerable changes in the apparent toxicity of ovicidal liquids; ovicidal experiments are recorded and explained. In general, the egg becomes more resistant to lipophiles over the first six days and less resistant afterwards, due to the wax impregnation. The resistance to hydrophiles increases during development due to the epembryonic layer and secondary wax, but decreases when the membranes are broken down just before eclosion.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , March 1949 , pp. 467 - 488
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beament, J. W. L. (1945). The cuticular lipoids of insects.—J. exp. Biol., 21, p. 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beament, J. W. L.. (1946a). The waterproofing mechanism of an insect egg.—Nature, Lond., 157, p. 370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beament, J. W. L.. (1946b). The formation and structure of the chorion of the egg in an Hemipteron, Rhodnius prolixus.—Quart. J. micr. Sci., 87, p. 393.Google Scholar
Beament, J. W. L.. (1946c). The waterproofing process in eggs of Rhodnius prolixus Stähl.—Proc. roy. Soc., (B) 133, p. 407.Google Scholar
Beament, J. W. L.. (1947). The formation and structure of the, micropylar complex in the egg-shell of Rhodnius prolixus Stähl.—J. exp. Biol., 23, p. 231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beament, J. W. L.. (1948). The penetration of insect egg-shells. I.—Penetration of the chorion of Rhodnius prolixus, Stå —Bull. ent. Res., 39, p. 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, F. L. (1929). The detection and estimation of insect chitin; and the irrelation of “chitinisation” to hardness and pigmentation of the cuticle of the American cockroach, P. americana L.—Ann. ent. Soc. Amer., 22, p. 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cory, E. N. (1929). Control measures for European red-mite on peach and apple.—Trans. Peninsula hort. Soc., Jan., 1929, p. 109.Google Scholar
Fraenkel-Courat, F. & Cooper, M. (1944). The use of dyes for the detection of acid and basic groups in proteins.—J. biol. Chem., 154, p. 339.Google Scholar
Goddard, D. R. & Michaelis, L. (1934). A study on keratin.—J. biol. Chem., 106, p. 605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, H. C. (1940). The toxicity of sulphur dioxide to the bed bug, Cimex lectularius L.—Ann. appl. Biol., 27, p. 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, H. (1943). Principles of insecticide action as a guide to drug reactivity-phase distribution relationships.—Trans. Faraday Soc., 39, p. 390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuenen, D. J. (1946). Het winterei van het fruitspint (Metatetranychus ulmi Koch), an zijn bestrijding.—Tijdschr. PlZiekt., 52, p. 69.Google Scholar
Lees, A. D. (1947). Transpiration and the structure of the epicuticle in ticks.—J. exp. Biol., 23, p. 379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lees, A. D. & Beament, J. W. L. (1948).—Quart. J. micr. Sci., 89, p. 291.Google Scholar
Lison, L. (1936). Histochimie animale.—Paris, Gauthier Villars.Google Scholar
Loeb, J. (1913). Artificial Parthenogenesis and Fertilisation.—Chicago.Google Scholar
Mellanby, H. (1935). The early embryonic development of Rhodnius prolixus.—Quart. J. micr. Sci., 78, p. 71.Google Scholar
Mellanby, H. (1936). The later embryology of Rhodnius prolixus.—Quart. J. micr. Sci., 79, p. 1.Google Scholar
Sikes, E. K. & Wigglesworth, V. B. (1931). The hatching of insects from the eggs and-the appearance of air in the, tracheal system.—Quart. J. micr. Sci., 74, p. 165.Google Scholar
Slifer, E. H. (1937). The origin and fate of the membranes surrounding the grasshopper egg.—Quart. J. micr. Sci., 79, p. 493.Google Scholar
Slifer, E. H.. (1946). The effect of xylol and other solvents on diapause in the grass-hopper egg.—J. exp. Zool., 102, p. 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speyer, W. (1934). Obstbaumkarbolineum als Schädlingsbekämpfungsmittel.—Z. angew. Ent., 20, p. 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, P. C. & LaHue, D. W. (1946). Rapid vacuum fumigation of the body louse with methyl bromide.—J. econ. Ent., 39, p. 581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, J. E. & Green, R. A. (1945). On the penetration of insecticides through the insect cuticle.—J. exp. Biol., 22, p. 8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1945). Transpiration through the cuticle of insects.—J. exp. Biol., 21, p. 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B.. (1947). The epicuticle of an insect, Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera).—Proc. roy. Soc., (B) 134, p. 162.Google ScholarPubMed