Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T09:36:55.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Rothamsted Insect Survey ‘12-metre' suction trap

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

E. D. M. Macaulay
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, AL52JQ, UK
G. M. Tatchell
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, AL52JQ, UK
L. R. Taylor
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, AL52JQ, UK

Abstract

Suction traps sampling at a height of 12·2 m have been operated by the Rothamsted Insect Survey since 1964 to monitor the aerial movement of aphids and other insects. Many variants of the trap have evolved in other countries due to the lack of a detailed published description. A standard for a low maintenance structure of the ‘12-metre' suction trap now being adopted by the Rothamsted Insect Survey and some other users is described. This should lead to better uniformity and comparability of data from such traps.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernard, J. (Ed.) (1982). Euraphid Gembloux 1982.—91 pp. Gembloux, Stn Zool. Appl.Google Scholar
Bouchery, Y. (1979 a). Pour l'étude des vols de pucerons une méthode de capture par piège à aspiration.—Phytoma 304, 3940.Google Scholar
Bouchery, Y. (1979 b). Description d'un collecteur, utilisable à l'extérieur, destiné à recueillir automatiquement les captures d'arthropodes d'un piège à succion.—Ann. Zool., Ecol. Anim. 11, 113117.Google Scholar
Derron, J. O. & Goy, G. (1987). Utilisation du piège à aspiration pour la prévision des épidémies de virus.—Revue Suisse Agr. 19, 129132.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. G. (1950). A suction trap for small airborne insects which automatically segregates the catch into successive hourly samples.—Ann. app!. Biol. 37, 8091.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. G. (1957). The distribution of insects in the air and the empirical relation of density to height.—J. Anim. Ecol. 26, 479494.Google Scholar
Ower, E. & Pankhurst, R. C. (1977). The measurement of air flow.—362 pp. Oxford, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Tatchell, G. M. (1985). Aphid-control advice to farmers and the use of aphid-monitoring data.—Crop Prot. 4, 3950.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1962). The absolute efficiency of insect suction traps.—Ann. appl. Biol. 50, 405421.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1973). Monitor surveying for migrant insect pests.—Outlook on Agriculture 7, 109116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1974). Insect migration, flight periodicity and the boundary layer.—J. Anim. Ecol. 43, 225238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1977). Aphid forecasting and the Rothamsted Insect Survey.—Jl R. agric. Soc. 138, 7597.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (Ed.) (1981). Euraphid Rothamsted 1980.–218 pp. Harpenden, UK, Rothamsted Expl Stn.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1984). A handbook for aphid identification.–171 pp. Harpenden, UK, Rothamsted Expl Stn.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1986). Synoptic dynamics, migration and the Rothamsted Insect Survey.—J. Anim. Ecol. 55, 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. R. & Palmer, J. M. P. (1972). Aerial sampling. pp. 189234 in van Emden, H. F. (Ed.). Aphid technology. 344 pp. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Winternitz, F. A. L. & Fischl, C. F. (1957). A simplified integration technique for pipe-flow measurement.—Wat. Pwr 9, 225234.Google Scholar
Woiwod, I. P., Tatchell, G. M. & Barrett, A. M. (1984). A system for the rapid collection, analysis and dissemination of aphid-monitoring data from suction traps.—Crop Prot. 3, 273288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar