Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:55:56.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies On The biology and systematic position of a new species of ichneumonid parasitising the light brown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

W. Danthanarayana ,
D. Farrugia  and
I. D. Gauld
W. Danthanarayana
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, La Trobe University Victoria, 3083, Australia.
D. Farrugia
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, La Trobe University Victoria, 3083, Australia.
I. D. Gauld
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, c/o British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 5BD, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Australoglypta latrobei gen. et sp.n., an ichneumonid parasitic on the larvae of the tortricid Epiphyas postvittana (Wlk.) in Australia, is described and compared with related genera. The mating and oviposition behaviour of the ichneumonid is noted, and its abundance over 13 generations of E. postvittana between 1972 and 1976 was investigated. A delayed inverse (density-dependent) relationship was found to exist between host and parasite. Possible beneficial effects of this parasite are discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 67 , Issue 4 , December 1977 , pp. 607 - 617
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baird, A. B.. (1958). Biological control of insect and plant pests in Canada. —Proc. 10 th int. Congr. Ent. (1956) 4, 483–485.Google Scholar
Boyce, H. R.. (1947). Long term trends in parasitism of twig-infesting oriental fruit moth larvae. —Rep. ent. Soc. Ont. no. 77 (1946), 21–34.Google Scholar
Collyer, E. & Geldermalsen, M. van.. (1975). Integrated control of apple pests in New Zealand. I. Outline of experiment and general results. —N.Z.J. Zool. 2, 101–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danthanarayana, W.. (1975a). The bionomics, distribution and host range of the light brown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana (Walk.) (Tortricidae). —Aust. J. Zool. 23, 419–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danthanarayana, W.. (1975b). Factors determining variation in fecundity of the light brown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana (Walker) (Tortricidae). —Aust. J. Zool. 23, 439–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danthanarayana, W.. (1976a). Flight thresholds and seasonal variations in flight activity of light-brown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana (Walk.) (Tortricidae), in Victoria, Australia. —Oecologia 23, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danthanarayana, W.. (1976b). Diel and lunar flight periodicities in the light brown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana (Walker) (Tortricidae) and thei possiblea daptive significance. —Aust. J. Zool. 24, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danthanarayana, W.. (1976c). Environmentally cued size variation in the light-brown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana (Walk.) (Tortricidae) and its adaptive value in dispersal. —Oecologia 26, 121–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeBach, P.. (1964). Biological control of insect pests and weeds. — 844 pp. LondonChapman.Google Scholar
DeBach, P.. (1974). Biological control by natural enemies. —323 pp. London, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drooz, A. T.. (1960). White–pine shoot borer (Eucosoma gloriola Heinrich). —J. econ. Ent. 53 248–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumbleton, L. J.. (1982). The apple leaf-roller (Tortrix postvittana Walker). —N.Z. Jl Sci. Technol. 14, 83–92.Google Scholar
Lewis, F. B.. (1960). Factors affecting assessment of parasitisation by Apanteles fumiferanae Vier. and Glypta fumiferanae (Vier.) on spruce budworm larvae. —Can. Ent. 92, 881–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, C. A.. (1955). A technique for assessing spruce budworm larval mortality caused by parasites. —Can. J. Zool. 33, 5–17.Google Scholar
Miller, C. A.. (1960). The interaction of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) and the parasite Glypta fumiferanae (Vier.). —Can. Ent. 92, 839–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, J. R. T.. (1959). A description and classification of the final instar larvae of the Ichneumonidae (Insecta, Hymenoptera). —Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 110, 391–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, M. E.. (1964). Analysis of processes involved in the natural control of insects. —Adv. ecol. Res. 2, 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E.. (1966). Ecological methods with particular reference to the study of insect populations. —391 pp. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Townes, H.. (1970). The genera of Ichneumonidae, part 3. —Mem. Am. ent. Inst. 13, 307 pp.Google Scholar
Townes, H., Townes, M. & Gupta, V. K.. (1961). A catalogue and reclassification of the Indo-Australian Ichneumonidae. —522 pp. Ann Arbor, American Entomological Institute.Google Scholar
Varley, G. C., Gradwell, G. R. & Hassell, M. P.. (1973). Insect population ecology: an analytical approach.—212 pp. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
Wilson, F.. (1963). Australia as a source of beneficial insects for biological control. —Tech. Commun. Commonw. Inst. biol. Control no. 3, 28 pp.Google Scholar
Wishart, G.. (1947). Important reduction of three introduced pests in British Columbia by introduced parasites. —Rep. ent. Soc. Ont. no. 77 (1946), 35–37.Google Scholar