Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:18:54.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A survey of the Arthropod fauna of plum trees at East Malling in 1966

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Lena K. Ward
Affiliation:
East Malling Research Station, Maidstone, Kent

Extract

In an investigation of the fauna of plum at East Mailing Research Station in 1966, over 70 species of the commoner arthropods were listed.

Different species of mite were found to prefer different parts of the tree, different parts of the leaf, and leaves of different ages on a shoot. Aculus fockeui (Nal. & Trt.) (Eriophyidae) was found to spread up the shoots during the early summer and to attain a density of over 100 per sq. cm. of leaf surface. Panonychus ulmi (Koch) was found to be commoner to the east of the tree, and leaf damage that it caused graded in severity across the plot. The species composition of populations of the Phytoseiid mites could differ markedly between trees in the same plot.

A study of the population trends of the commoner species based on numbers per shoot revealed that the populations of aphids and their predators developed two peaks during the season. There was a relatively high incidence of Entomophthora infection on the aphids, and overwintering fungal spores were produced when the aphids died in crevices on the bark, but only short-lived cornidia when they died on the leaves. The population density of member species of the fauna varied considerably, the smallest phytophagous mites reaching levels of 200 per shoot, predacious mites 10.0 per shoot and predatory bugs such as Blepharidopterus angulatus (Fall.) only about 0.01 per shoot.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, E. W. (1965). A review of the genera of the family Tydeidae (Acarina).—In Naegele, J. A. Ed. Advances in acarology 2 pp. 95133.Google Scholar
Baker, W. V. (1967). Some observations on predation in an Anystid mite.—Entomologist’s mon. Mag. 103 pp. 5859.Google Scholar
Blair, C. A. (1951). Damage to apple leaves by the fruit tree red spider mite, Metatetranychus ulmi (Koch).—Rep. E. Malling Res. Stn 1950 pp. 152154.Google Scholar
Byford, W. J. & Ward, L. K. (1968). Effect of the situation on the host at death on the type of spore produced by Entomophthora spp.—Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 51 pp. 598600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chant, D. A. (1956). Predacious spiders in orchards in south-eastern England.—J. hort. Sci. 31 pp. 3546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chant, D. A. (1959). Phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Part I. Bionomics of seven species in south-eastern England.—Can. Ent. 91 suppl. 12 pp. 544.Google Scholar
Collyer, E. (1951). The separation of Conwentzia pineticola End. from Conwentzia psociformis (Curt.), and notes on their biology.—Bull. ent. Res. 42 pp. 555564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collyer, E. (1952). Biology of some predatory insects and mites associated with the fruit tree red spider mite (Metatetranychus ulmi (Koch)) in south-eastern England. I. The biology of Blepharidopterus angulatus (Fall.) (Hemiptera-Heteroptera, Miridae).—J. hort. Sci. 27 pp. 117129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collyer, E. (1953). Biology of some predatory insects and mites associated with the fruit tree red spider mite (Metatetranychus ulmi (Koch)) in south-eastern England. II. Some important predators of the mite.—J. hort. Sci. 28 pp. 8597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, H. A. (1959). Quadrant distribution of mites on leaves of Texas grapefruit.—J. econ. Ent. 52 pp. 725727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosse, G. (1956). Uber die Entwicklung einiger Raubmilben bei verschiedenen Nahrungstieren (Acar., Phytoseiidae).—P flanzenschutzberichte 16 pp. 122136.Google Scholar
Listo, J., Listo, E. M. & Kanervo, V. (1939). Tutkimuksia hedelmäpuupunkista (Paratetranychus pilosus C. & F.).—Valt. Mattalouskoet. Julk. 99, 143 pp.Google Scholar
Lord, F. T. (1965). Sampling predator populations on apple trees in Nova Scotia.—Can. Ent. 97 pp. 287298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massee, A. M. (1937). Notes on some interesting mites and insects observed on fruit trees in 1936.—Rep. E. Malling Rcs. Stn 1936 pp. 222228.Google Scholar
Massee, A. M. (1954). The pests of fruits and hops.—325 pp. London, Crosby Lockwood.Google Scholar
Mathys, G. & Van De Vrie, M. (1965). Etude comparative des méthodes de recensement de l’acarien rouge Panonychus ulmi Koch.—Entomophaga 10 pp. 265271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, M. G. (1965). Some aspects of the biology of Psallus ambiguus (Fall.) (Heteroptera: Miridae) on apple trees in Kent.—Entomologist 98 pp. 1431.Google Scholar
Muir, R. C. (1965). The effect of sprays on the fauna of apple trees. II. Some aspects of the interaction between populations of Blepharidopterus angulatus (Fall.) (Heteroptera: Miridae) and its prey, Panonychus ulmi (Koch) (Acarina: Tetranychidae).—J. appl. Ecol. 2 pp. 4357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, S. C. (1947). The statistical interpretation of data from red spider mite trials.—J. Pomol. 23 pp. 252253.Google Scholar
Post, A. (1962). Effect of cultural measures on the population density of the fruit tree red spider mite, Metatetranychus ulmi Koch (Acari, Tetranychidae).—Tijdschr. PlZiekt. 68 pp. 1110.Google Scholar
Putman, W. L. (1939). The plum nursery mite (Phyllocoptes fockeui Nal. & Trt.).—Rep. ent. Soc. Ont. 70 pp. 3340.Google Scholar
Putman, W. L. (1962). Life history and behaviour of the predacious mite Typhlodromus (T.) caudiglans Schuster (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in Ontario, with notes on the prey of related species.—Can. Ent. 94 pp. 163177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putman, W. L. & Herne, D. H. C. (1964). Relations between Typhlodromus caudiglans Schuster (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) and phytophagous mites in Ontario peach orchards.—Can. Ent. 96 pp. 925943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thill, H. (1964). Ergebnisse der integrierten Schädlingsbekämpfung in Zwetschenbau.—Entomophaga 9 pp. 247251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van De Vrie, M. (1964). The distribution of phytophagous and predacious mites on leaves and shoots of apple trees.—Entomophaga 9 pp. 233238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar