Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:21:18.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of cross-resistance potential to neonicotinoid insecticides in Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

N. Prabhaker ,
S. Castle ,
T.J. Henneberry  and
N.C. Toscano
N. Prabhaker*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
S. Castle
Affiliation:
Western Cotton Research Laboratory, USDA/ARS, Phoenix, AZ 85040, USA
T.J. Henneberry
Affiliation:
Western Cotton Research Laboratory, USDA/ARS, Phoenix, AZ 85040, USA
N.C. Toscano
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
*
*4135 E Broadway Road, Phoenix, AZ 85040, USA Fax: (602) 437 1274 E-mail: nilima.castle@ucr.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Laboratory bioassays were carried out with four neonicotinoid insecticides on multiple strains of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) to evaluate resistance and cross-resistance patterns. Three imidacloprid-resistant strains and field populations from three different locations in the southwestern USA were compared in systemic uptake bioassays with acetamiprid, dinotefuran, imidacloprid and thiamethoxam. An imidacloprid-resistant strain (IM-R) with 120-fold resistance originally collected from Imperial Valley, California, did not show cross-resistance to acetamiprid, dinotefuran or thiamethoxam. The Guatemala-resistant strain (GU-R) that was also highly resistant to imidacloprid (RR = 109-fold) showed low levels of cross-resistance when bioassayed with acetamiprid and thiamethoxam. However, dinotefuran was more toxic than either imidacloprid or thiamethoxam to both IM-R and GU-R strains as indicated by low LC50s. By contrast, a Q-biotype Spanish-resistant strain (SQ-R) of B. tabaci highly resistant to imidacloprid demonstrated high cross-resistance to the two related neonicotinoids. Field populations from Imperial Valley (California), Maricopa and Yuma (Arizona), showed variable susceptibility to imidacloprid (LC50s ranging from 3.39 to 115 μg ml–1) but did not exhibit cross-resistance to the three neonicotinoids suggesting that all three compounds would be effective in managing whiteflies. Yuma populations were the most susceptible to imidacloprid. Dinotefuran was the most toxic of the four neonicotinoids against field populations. Although differences in binding at the target site and metabolic pathways may influence the variability in cross-resistance patterns among whitefly populations, comparison of whitefly responses from various geographic regions to the four neonicotinoids indicates the importance of ecological and operational factors on development of cross-resistance to the neonicotinoids.

Keywords

whitefliesimidacloprid resistanceacetamipriddinotefuranthiamethoxam
Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 95 , Issue 6 , December 2005 , pp. 535 - 543
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Araki, Y., Bornatsch, W., Brauner, A., Clark, T., Drager, G., Kurogochi, S., Sakamoto, H. & Vogeler, K. (1994) Metabolism of imidacloprid in plants. Proceedings of the IUPAC Congress, 2B, 57 Washington.Google Scholar
Banks, G., Green, R.L., Cerezo, E.R., Louro, D. & Markham, P.G. (1998) Use of RAPD-PCR to characterize whitefly species in the Iberian peninsula. Abstracts of the 2nd International Workshop on Bemisia and Geminiviral Diseases, San Juan, Puerto Rico.Google Scholar
Cahill, M. & Denholm, I. (1999) Managing resistance to the chloronicotinyl insecticides – rhetoric or reality? pp. 253–270in Yamamoto, I & Casida, J.E. (Eds) Nicotinoid insecticides and the nicotinic acetylcholinesterase receptor. Tokyo, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, M., Gorman, K., Day, S., Denholm, I., Elbert, A. & Nauen, R. (1996) Baseline determination and detection of resistance to imidacloprid in Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 86, 343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, S.J., Henneberry, T.J., Toscano, N.C., Prabhaker, N., Birdsall, S. & Weddle, D. (1995) Silverleaf whiteflies show no increase in insecticide resistance. California Agriculture 50, 18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, S.J., Toscano, N.C., Prabhaker, N., Henneberry, T.J. & Palumbo, J.C. (2002) Field evaluation of insecticide use strategies as resistance management and control tactics for Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 92, 449–460CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denholm, I., Cahill, M., Byrne, F.J. & Devonshire, A.L. (1996) Progress with documenting and combating insecticide resistance in Bemisia. pp. 577–603in Gerling, D. & Mayer, R.T.Bemisia 1995: taxonomy, biology, damage, control and management. Andover, Intercept.Google Scholar
Elbert, A. & Nauen, R. (2000) Resistance of Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) to insecticides in southern Spain with special reference to neonicotinoids. Pest Management Science 56, 60–643.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georghiou, G.P. (1965) Genetic studies on insecticide resistance. Advances in Pest Control Research 6, 171–230Google ScholarPubMed
Georghiou, G.P. & Taylor, C.E. (1977a) Genetic and biological influence in the evolution of insecticide resistance. Journal of Economic Entomology 70, 319–323CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georghiou, G.P. & Taylor, C.E. (1977b) Operational influences in the evolution of insecticide resistance. Journal of Economic Entomology 70, 653–658CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guirao, P., Beitia, F. & Cenis, J.L. (1997) Biotype determination in Spanish populations of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 87, 587–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollingworth, R.M., Mota-Sanchez, D., Whalon, M.E. & Graphius, E. (2002) Comparative pharmokinetics of imidacloprid in susceptible and resistant Colorado potato beetles. Proceedings of the 10th IUPAC International Congress on the Chemistry of Crop Protection, Basel 2002, 1, 312.Google Scholar
Horowitz, A.R., Weintraub, P.G. & Ishaaya, I. (1998) Status of pesticide resistance in arthropod pests in Israel. Phytoparasitica 26, 231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiriyama, K. & Nishimura, K. (2002) Structural effects of dinotefuran and analogues in insecticidal and neural activities. Pest Management Science 58, 669–676CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nauen, R., Reckmann, U., Armborst, S., Stupp, H.P. & Elbert, A. (1999) Whitefly active metabolites of imidacloprid: biological efficacy and translocation in cotton plants. Pesticide Science 55, 265–2713.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nauen, R., Stumpf, N. & Elbert, A. (2002) Toxicological and mechanistic studies on neonicotinoid cross resistance in Q-type Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Pest Management Science 58, 858–875CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prabhaker, N., Toscano, N.C., Castle, S.J. & Henneberry, T.J. (1997) Selection for imidacloprid resistance in silverleaf whiteflies from the Imperial Valley and development of a hydroponic bioassay for resistance monitoring. Pesticide Science 51, 419–4263.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, J.L. & Priesler, H.K. (1992) Pesticide bioassays with arthropods. 127 pp. Boca Raton, Florida CRC.Google Scholar
Russell, R.M., Robertson, J.L. & Savin, N.E. (1977) POLO: a new computer programme for probit analysis. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 23, 209–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stumpf, N. & Nauen, R. (2002) Mechanistic studies on neonicotinoid cross-resistance in Q-type Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Proceedings of the 10th IUPAC International Congress on the Chemistry of Crop Protection, Basel 2002, 1, 292.Google Scholar
Taylor, C.E. & Georghiou, G.P. (1982) Influence of pesticide persistence in evolution of resistance. Environmental Entomology 11, 746–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomizawa, M. & Casida, J.E. (2003) Selective toxicity of neonicotinoids attributable to specificity of insect and mammalian nicotinic receptors. Annual Review of Entomology 48, 339–364CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wen, Z. & Scott, J.G. (1997) Cross-resistance to imidacloprid in strains of German cockroach (Blattella germanica) and house fly (Musca domestica). Pesticide Science 49, 367–3713.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zewen, L., Zhaojun, H., Yinchang, W., Lingchun, Z., Hongwei, Z. & Chengjun, L. (2003) Selection for imidacloprid resistance in Nilaparvata lugens: cross-resistance patterns and possible mechanisms. Pest Management Science 59, 1355–1359CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed