Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:41:52.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of density of pheromone sources, pheromone dosage and population pressure on mating of pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

M. Kehat ,
L. Anshelevich ,
D. Gordon ,
M. Harel ,
L. Zilberg  and
E. Dunkelblum
M. Kehat
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research Organization, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
L. Anshelevich
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research Organization, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
D. Gordon
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research Organization, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
M. Harel
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research Organization, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
L. Zilberg
Affiliation:
‘Eden’ Experimental Station, Bet Shean, Israel
E. Dunkelblum*
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research Organization, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
*
* Fax: 972 3 9683647 E-mail: edun@netvision.net.il
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of density of the Shin-Etsu twist-tie rope pheromone formulation (PBW rope L®) on mating of female pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella(Saunders) was tested in Israel. The success of mating disruption was evaluated during 1997 by the mating table technique, comparing the percentage of mating of virgin sentinel females in pheromone-treated and control plots. Under low pest population pressure application of ‘long-life’ formulation of P. gossypiellapheromone, PBW rope L®, spaced 9 m, 11 m and 14 m apart, resulted in very high suppression of mating (96.5–100%) and complete shut-down of pheromone trap catch. These application rates were much lower than those now prevailing in Israel and elsewhere. Spacing of ropes 20 m apart resulted in less effective mating disruption of 65% only, and shut-down of pheromone traps was also incomplete. The tests during 1998 were carried out at high pest population and efficacy of treatments was assessed by the reduction of male capture in traps in pheromone-treated plots relative to catches in the control. The distance between pheromone sources proved to be the most critical factor determining success. In both years, any spacing significantly greater than 10 m gave markedly less than complete trap catch shutdown/mating suppression. Pheromone dosages and population density were also important in determining mating success. Results obtained in this study indicate the possibility of reducing the number of pheromone sources per unit area and the total amount of pheromone as compared with that in use today, only at very low pest populations. However at high population levels, dispensers closely-spaced, with increased dosages of pheromone, are required.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 89 , Issue 4 , April 1999 , pp. 339 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cardé, R.T. & Minks, A.K. (1995) Control of moth pests by mating disruption: successes and constraints. Annual Review of Entomology 40, 559–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Critchley, B.R., Chamberlain, D.J., Campion, D.G., Attique, M.R., Ali, M. & Ghaffar, A. (1991) Integrated use of pink bollworm pheromone formulations and selected conventional insecticides for the control of the cotton complex in Pakistan. Bulletin of Entomological Research 81, 371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Deeb, Y.A., El Hamaky, M.A. & Moawad, G.M. (1993) Large scale use of pink bollworm sex pheromone formulations integrated with conventional insecticides for the control of cotton pests in Egypt. International Organization for Biological Control, West Region Section Bulletin 16, 213–219.Google Scholar
Flint, H.M., Merkle, J.R. & Yamamoto, A. (1985) Pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae): field testing a new polyethylene tube dispenser for gossyplure. Journal of Economic Entomology 78, 1431–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummel, H.E., Gaston, L.K., Shorey, H.H., Kaae, R.S., Byrne, K.J. & Silverstein, R.J. (1973) Clarification of the chemical status of the pink bollworm sex pheromone. Science 81, 873–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehat, M., Anshelevich, L., Gordon, D., Harel, M. & Dunkelblum, E. (1998) Evaluation of Shin-Etsu twist tie rope dispensers by the mating table technique for disrupting mating of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and the pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 88, 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, E.R., Kehat, M., Tingle, F.C. & McLaughlin, J.R. (1997) Suppression of mating of beet armyworm (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera) in cotton with pheromone. Journal of Agricultural Entomology 14, 17–28.Google Scholar
Nakache, J., Dunkelblum, E., Kehat, M., Anshelewich, L. & Miriam, H. (1992) Mating disruption of the spiny bollworm, Earias insulana (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), with Shin Etsu twist-tie ropes in Israel. Bulletin of Entomological Research 82, 369–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, H.H. & Gerber, R.G. (1996a) Use of puffers for disruption of sex pheromone communication among naval orangeworm moths (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in almonds, pistachios, and walnuts. Environmental Entomology 25, 1154–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, H.H. & Gerber, R.G. (1996b) Disruption of pheromone communication through the use of puffers for control of beet armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in tomatoes. Environmental Entomology 25, 1401–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staten, R.T., Flint, H.M., Weddle, R.C., Hernandes, E. & Yamamoto, A. (1987) Pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae): large-scale field trials with a high-rate gossyplure formulation. Journal of Economic Entomology 80, 1267–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R.G.D. & Torrie, J.H. (1960) Principles and procedures of statistics. New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar