Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T23:53:35.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How does Neoseiulus californicus McGregor respond to sublethal doses of entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana (Hyp.: Cordycipitaceae)?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2024

Katayoon Kheradmand*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Mahmoud Heidari
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Amin Sedaratian-Jahromi
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran
Reza Talaei-Hassanloui
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
Mohammadreza Havasi
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
*
Corresponding author: Katayoon Kheradmand; Email: kkheradmand@ut.ac.ir
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Prostigmata), is one of the most economically important mite species, mainly controlled by chemical acaricides. Natural enemies have been assessed as reliable alternatives for management of this phytophagous mite. In the current project, demographic characteristics of Neoseiulus californicus McGregor (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to sublethal concentrations (LC10 = 6.76 × 102, LC20 = 8.74 × 103 and LC30 = 55.38 × 103 conidia ml−1) of entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. TV strain were investigated under laboratory conditions at 25 ± 2°C, 70 ± 5% RH and a photoperiod of 16:8 (L:D) h. Our results indicated that when adult predators were exposed to LC20 and LC30 of B. bassiana, the oviposition period was significantly reduced compared with other treatments. Neoseiulus californicus fecundity was significantly greater in the control (37 eggs) than in LC30 (24 eggs). Life table analysis revealed that the net reproductive rate (R0) declined as the sublethal concentrations of B. bassiana increased. The most striking result to emerge from the data is that not only intrinsic (r); but also, finite rate of increase (λ) was not significantly affected by different concentrations of B. bassiana. Our findings revealed some potential interactions of B. bassiana and N. californicus during their combinations for managing T. urticae that may be helpful for optimising control of this important pest.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

The two-spotted spider mite (TSSM), Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae), is one of the more economically important pests of many plants (e.g. tomato, cucumber, cotton, eggplant, bean, raspberry, soybean and others) in different parts of the world (Van Leeuwen et al., Reference Van Leeuwen, Vontas, Tsagkarakou, Dermauw and Tirry2010; Sedaratian et al., Reference Sedaratian, Fathipour and Moharramipour2011; Vergel et al., Reference Vergel, Bustos, Rodríguez and Cantor2011; Khanamani et al., Reference Khanamani, Fathipour and Hajiqanbar2013; Havasi et al., Reference Havasi, Kheradmand, Mosallanejad and Fathipour2018; Azadi-Qoort et al., Reference Azadi-Qoort, Sedaratian-Jahromi, Haghani and Ghane-Jahromi2019). The feeding activities of TSSM usually results in chlorosis, leaf and fruit deformation, and stunted plant growth which can lead to reduced marketability of the final production (Lahai et al., Reference Lahai, Ekanayake and George1998; Dogan et al., Reference Dogan, Hazir, Yildiz, Butt and Cakmak2017).

While chemicals have long represented the basis for control programmes for managing pests, diseases and weeds because of rapid impact and low cost (Zhao, Reference Zhao2000; Stanley and Preetha, Reference Stanley and Preetha2016; Akyazi et al., Reference Akyazi, Soysal, Altunç, Lisle, Hassan and Akyol2018), reliance on these chemical compounds may cause high levels of resistance in pest populations and negatively affect natural enemy populations (Bugeme et al., Reference Bugeme, Knapp, Boga, Ekesi and Maniania2014; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Rao and Vinson2014; Li et al., Reference Li, Zhang, Tian, Liu, Liu, Liu and Wang2017; Međo et al., Reference Međo, Stojnić and Marčić2017). It is well documented that T. urticae can develop resistance to pesticides in a short period of time (Van Leeuwen et al., Reference Van Leeuwen, Vontas, Tsagkarakou, Dermauw and Tirry2010) due to its short life cycle and high reproductive potential (Nauen et al., Reference Nauen, Stumpf, Elbert, Zebitz and Kraus2001). Therefore, to achieve sustainable management of this mite pest, it is so crucial to develop integrated programmes that do not rely only on pesticides.

Predatory mites have been adopted as an effective alternative for managing the TSSM on a variety of plants in different agricultural systems (Song et al., Reference Song, Zheng, Zhang and Li2016; Fathipour et al., Reference Fathipour, Karimi, Farazmand and Talebi2017; Riahi et al., Reference Riahi, Fathipour, Talebi and Mehrabadi2017; Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Clercq, Song, Li and Zhang2017). The predator Neoseiulus californicus McGregor (Acari: Phytoseiidae), is a well-known effective natural enemy against spider mites, other pest mites and small pest insects (Castagnoli and Simoni, Reference Castagnoli and Simoni2003). As a type II generalist, N. californicus can adapt to fluctuate in prey populations and temperatures, providing stable pest suppression over long periods of time (Castagnoli and Simoni, Reference Castagnoli and Simoni2003; Escudero and Ferragut, Reference Escudero and Ferragut2005; Greco et al., Reference Greco, Liljesthröm, Gugole Ottaviano, Cluigt, Cingolani, Zembo and Sánchez2011). That said, use of this predator alone cannot keep the population of target pests below economic injury levels (Alzoubi and Cobanoglu, Reference Alzoubi and Cobanoglu2007). Accordingly, combined use of this predator with other natural enemies could enhance the efficiency of control strategies (Cock et al., Reference Cock, van Lenteren, Brodeur, Barratt, Bigler, Bolckmans, Cônsoli, Haas, Mason and Parra2010).

The fungal species Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. (Hyp.: Cordycipitaceae) has a wide host range, and several strains have been used as commercial mycoinsecticides (de Faria and Wraight, Reference de Faria and Wraight2007; Zimmermann, Reference Zimmermann2007), and commercial formulations of B. bassiana are used to suppress outbreaks of a wide range of arthropod pests (Wraight et al., Reference Wraight, Carruthers, Jaronski, Bradley, Garza and Galaini-Wraight2000; de Faria and Wraight, Reference de Faria and Wraight2001; Shipp et al., Reference Shipp, Zhang, Hunt and Ferguson2003; Kaoud, Reference Kaoud2010; Steenberg and Kilpinen, Reference Steenberg and Kilpinen2014).

As Integrated Pest Management (IPM) aims to reduce pest populations to tolerable levels (Croft, Reference Croft1990), the possible impacts of sublethal concentrations of chemicals and entomopathogens are poorly understood (Pozzebon and Duso, Reference Pozzebon and Duso2010; Seiedy et al., Reference Seiedy, Saboori and Allahyari2012; Shipp et al., Reference Shipp, Kapongo, Park and Kevan2012). Sublethal effects are determined as physiological and/or behavioural effects on individuals that survive after exposure to a toxic compound at sublethal concentrations/doses (Desneux et al., Reference Desneux, Decourtye and Delpuech2007). Sublethal effects of fungal infection may have significant implications for the population dynamics of the hosts, which finally contributes to the pest status of the target organisms (Arthurs and Thomas, Reference Arthurs and Thomas2000; Blanford and Thomas, Reference Blanford and Thomas2001). Furthermore, demographic toxicological analysis is generally considered to be the best way for measuring the total effects of insecticides on non-target insects (Biondi et al., Reference Biondi, Desneux, Siscaro and Zappalà2012), and life tables have been used to help determine the sublethal effects at the population level (Stark and Banks, Reference Stark and Banks2003; Biondi et al., Reference Biondi, Zappalà, Stark and Desneux2013; Sedaratian et al., Reference Sedaratian, Fathipour, Talaei-Hassanloui and Jurat-Fuentes2013; Nawaz et al., Reference Nawaz, Cai, Jing, Zhou, Mabubu and Hua2017).

The lack of information on the sensitivity of predatory mites to B. bassiana has limited their usage in controlling spider mites (Ullah and Lim, Reference Ullah and Lim2017a, Reference Ullah and Lim2017b). The toxicity effects of various species of fungi (e.g. B. bassiana [strains Bb-032, Bb-053, Bb-057, Bb-086 and ICMP 8701] and Paecilomyces fumosoroseus (Wize)), on life table parameters of phytoseiid mites such as Phytoseiulus persimilis Athis-Henriot, N. californicus, Amblydromalus limonicus Garman & McGregor and Amblyseius largoensis (Muma) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) were previously well-documented by several researchers (e.g. Vergel et al., Reference Vergel, Bustos, Rodríguez and Cantor2011; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Zhang, Beggs and Wei2019; de Freitas et al., Reference de Freitas, de Araújo Lira, Jumbo, dos Santos, Rêgo and Teodoro2021). However, no evidence is available regarding the sublethal (LC10, LC20 and LC30) effects of the native strain (TV) of B. bassiana on the biological attributes of N. californicus. The effects of sublethal concentrations of this fungus on the different biological stages were determined in the present study. In this context, we assessed the sublethal concentrations (LC10, LC20 and LC30) of B. bassiana on the life table parameters of N. californicus, in order to provide basic information for sustainable management of T. urticae in different cropping systems.

Materials and methods

Biological materials

Stock colonies of N. californicus were provided by Koppert Biological Systems and reared in the laboratory on Cucumis sativus L. (Cucurbitaceae; cv. Veolla F1). Colonies were fed with immature stages of T. urticae. The TSSM were taken from infested plants (Tehran; Iran) and released on the cucumber plants under conditions of 25 ± 2°C, 60 ± 5% RH and a photoperiod of 16 h light with 8 h darkness. The arenas used for N. californicus rearing were made according to McMurtry and Scriven (Reference McMurtry and Scriven1965). They were stored in a controlled climate room under conditions of 25 ± 2°C and 70 ± 5% RH, and a photoperiod of 16 h light and 8 h darkness.

Fungus source

A endemic strain (TV) of B. bassiana (soil origin) was cultured on Sabouraud Dexterose Agar (SDA) and maintained in absolute darkness at 25 ± 2°C and 70 ± 5% RH. This strain was obtained from the College of Agriculture and Natural Resource, University of Tehran. Cultures were discarded after sporulation and conidia were obtained (Goettel and Inglis, Reference Goettel and Inglis1997).

Bioassay

In bioassays, the confidence limits of mortality were of 10–90%, and in control treatment adults were treated with distilled water + 0.02% Tween-80. Additionally, 20 adult mites (24 h-old 10 males and 10 females) were located on the treated leaf discs (4 cm diameter) for every concentration by using a soft brush (0.00). Then, the leaf discs of cucumber were sprayed (Posada et al., Reference Posada, Aime, Peterson, Rehner and Vega2007) with B. bassiana and dried for 30 min at room conditions. After that, the Petri dish lids were sealed and transferred to the controlled climate room under conditions of 25 ± 2°C, 70 ± 5% RH and 16 h light and 8 h darkness. According to the results obtained, the sublethal concentrations were prepared with following average levels of fungus: LC10 = 6.76 × 102 ml−1, LC20 = 8.74 × 103 ml−1 and LC30 = 55.38 × 103 ml−1 conidia of entomopathogenic fungus.

Life-table assay

To assess the sublethal effects of B. bassiana on the dynamic performance of N. californicus, 60 adult females were transferred to fresh cucumber leaf discs, each of which was placed on a sponge in a Petri dish. The leaf discs were treated with different dosages of B. bassiana (i.e. distilled water, LC10, LC20 and LC30). After 24 h, surviving female adults were relocated separately on to untreated plants and left for one day to oviposit. After 24 h, one egg was randomly kept in each Petri dish and the other ones were eliminated. In the next step, all retained eggs were daily checked and their developmental time and survivorship, as well as female fecundity, were noted until death of the last mite. During experiments, the leaf discs were replaced by new ones as required.

Data analysis

The mortality data and the LC10, LC20 and LC30 values and their 95% fiducial limits were computed by probit analysis (IBM SPSS, Version, 19.0). Differences among population parameters were contrasted using the paired bootstrap method based on the confidence interval of difference (Akca et al., Reference Akca, Ayvaz, Yazici, Smith and Chi2015). Also, differences between the duration of different life stages were investigated with the Tukey–Kramer procedure (SAS Institute, 2002). The raw data of life table parameters were analysed according to the theory of age-stage, two-sex life table (Chi and Liu, Reference Chi and Liu1985; Chi, Reference Chi1988) by using the computer program of TWOSEX MSChart (Chi, Reference Chi2021). Population parameters and their standard errors were calculated using the bootstrap method with 100,000 replications (Huang and Chi, Reference Huang and Chi2013; Akköprü et al., Reference Akköprü, Atlıhan, Okut and Chi2015).

Results

Survival and fecundity

lx, mx and fxj of N. californicus at sublethal concentrations of B. bassiana are shown in fig. 1. The total lifespan for the predatory mites was 40, 41, 38 and 38 days at control, LC10, LC20 and LC30, respectively (fig. 1). Although the maximum value of mx was 1.28 eggs per female per day for untreated mites, which was on day 19 (fig. 1), the maximum value of mx for mites treated with LC10 treatment was 1.26 eggs per female per day that was observed on day 21 of the life period. However, maximum values of mx for LC20 and LC30 treatments were approximately 1.11 and 1.01 eggs per female per day, respectively, which was on days 18 and 19 (fig. 1).

Figure 1. Age-specific survivorship (lx), age-specific fecundity (mx) and age-stage-specific fecundity (fxj) of Neoseiulus californicus at different concentrations of Beauveria bassiana.

Estimation of sxj represents the probability that an egg will survive to age x and develop to stage j (fig. 2). Obvious overlap in these curves is attributable to the different developmental rates among the individuals. Both female and male individuals of N. californicus survived shorter periods of time with the LC20 and LC30 treatments than the control (fig. 2).

Figure 2. The age-stage-specific survival rate (sxj) of Neoseiulus californicus for control and different concentrations of Beauveria bassiana.

Impact on various life stages and female fecundity

The impact of sublethal concentrations of B. bassiana on the duration of separate life stages of N. californicus is shown in table 1. None of the larvae, protonymphs or deutonymphs of male and female individuals were affected by diverse concentrations of B. bassiana (male: larva, F = 4.86, df = 3, 68, P = 0.0021; protonymph, F = 1.14, df = 3, 68, P = 0.34; deutonymph, F = 2.16, df = 3, 68, P = 0.09; female: larva, F = 0.13, df = 3, 156, P = 0.02; protonymph, F = 0.34, df = 3, 156, P = 0.79; deutonymph, F = 0.17, df = 3, 156, P = 0.91). Egg development period of males and females was not affected by sublethal concentrations (male: df = 3, 68, F = 5.07, P = 0.0030; female: df = 3, 156, F = 5.26, P = 0.0018). When the individuals treated with higher concentrations of B. bassiana, longevity of male (LC20 and LC30) and female (LC20 and LC30) individuals (male: df = 3, 68, F = 22.7, P < 0.0001; female: df = 3, 156, F = 19.37, P < 0.0001), as well as total life span (male: df = 3, 68, F = 45.17, P < 0.0001; female: df = 3, 156, F = 30.29, P < 0.0001) were significantly different from the controls. The longest (31 days) and shortest (25 days) for female longevity as well as total life span were observed in control and LC30 treatments, respectively (table 1). The APOP (adult pre-ovipositional period from adult emergence to the first oviposition) and TPOP (total pre-ovipositional period from egg to the first oviposition) periods were not significantly affected by our experimental treatments (table 2), and TPOP ranged from 8.25 to 8.72 days (F = 2.23; df = 3, 156; P = 0.08). The shortest time for oviposition was 19 days for the mites treated at the highest concentration (F = 8.91; df = 3, 156; P < 0.0001). Similarly, fecundity of females was lowest at LC30 (24 eggs); whereas that of the control treatment was markedly higher (37 eggs) (F = 52.37; df = 3, 156; P < 0.0001).

Table 1. Sublethal effects of Beauveria bassiana on developmental times, adult longevity and total life span (mean ± SE) of Neoseiulus californicus

Means within a row followed by the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey–Kramer, P < 0.05).

Table 2. Mean (±SE) reproductive periods and total fecundity of offspring from females of Neoseiulus californicus at different concentrations of Beauveria bassiana

Means followed by the same letter in the same row are not significantly different (Tukey–Kramer, P < 0.05).

1 APOP = adult pre-ovipositional period (from adult emergence to the first oviposition).

2 TPOP = total pre-ovipositional period (from egg to the first oviposition).

Population parameters

Table 3 displays the population growth characteristics of offspring from the females of N. californicus treated with sublethal concentrations of B. bassiana. The data reveal that the gross reproductive rate (GRR) varied from 17.76 to 24.96 offspring/individual. The lowest values of GRR (17.76 offspring/individual) as well as R 0 (13.87 offspring/individual) were recorded for the mites exposed to the highest concentration (LC30) (table 3). The values of the intrinsic rate of increase (r) and finite rate of increase (λ) at the highest concentration (LC30) were not significantly lower than the lower concentration (LC10) and untreated mites. The mean generation times (T) calculated were 17.86 and 17.38 days for control and LC10 treatments, which were significantly different from the LC20 and LC30 values (16.57 and 16.26 days, respectively) (table 3).

Table 3. The effect of different treatments of Beauveria bassiana on the population parameters (mean ± SE) of Neoseiulus californicus

Means followed by different letters in the same column are significantly different (paired bootstrap test, P < 0.05).

Discussion

Biological control of insect and mite pests is a basic part of agricultural IPM systems and will reduce our current dependency on chemical pesticides for pest management (Hoy, Reference Hoy2012). We assessed the population dynamics of N. californicus, a predatory mite of T. urticae when treated with sublethal concentrations of the entomopathogenic fungus B. bassiana as this had not been studied previously.

When using phytoseiid predators, it is necessary to evaluate their compatibility with other natural enemies such as pathogens and predators. Most research has indicated that entomopathogenic fungi exhibit high pathogenicity for insect pests and phytophagous mites but no or lower levels of infection in predatory mites (Shi and Feng, Reference Shi and Feng2004; Wekesa et al., Reference Wekesa, Moraes, Knapp and Delalibera2007; Seyed-Talebi et al., Reference Seyed-Talebi, Kheradmand, Talaei-Hassanloui and Talebi-Jahromi2012, Reference Seyed-Talebi, Kheradmand, Talaei-Hassanloui and Talebi-Jahromi2014; Wu et al., Reference Wu, Gao, Zhang, Wang, Xu and Lei2014).

Our findings illustrated that, in terms of changes in development rates of N. californicus individuals, the survival curves at different treatments showed considerable overlap. In this experiment, the predatory mites treated with B. bassiana showed reduced age-specific survival rate (lx) and fecundity (mx). This was in line with the findings of Rashki et al. (Reference Rashki, Kharazi-Pakdel, Allahyari and Van Alphen2009) who studied the impact of B. bassiana (2 × 108 conidia ml−1) on the biological parameters in both sexes of Aphidius matricariae Haliday (Hym.: Braconidae), a parasitoid of the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hem.: Aphididae).

In our results, fungal treatment had no effect on immature developmental stages (larva, protonymph and deutonymph) which is in accordance with the observations of Zhou et al. (Reference Zhou, Ali and Huang2010) who estimated the effect of sublethal concentrations (1 × 104 and 1 × 108 conidia ml−1) of Isaria fumosorosea (Wize) Brown and Smith on the developmental time of the immature stages of a ladybird beetle Axinoscymnus cardilobus (Ren and Pang) (Col.: Coccinellidae). In contrast, Shang et al. (Reference Shang, Chen and Bai2018) showed that exposure to sublethal concentrations (1 × 108 conidia ml−1) of Acremonium hansfordii (Hyp.: Moniliales) significantly reduced the developmental period of Neoseiulus barkeri (Hughes). Such variations are probably attributable to differing plant nutritional quality of the host plants, and/or morphological or allelochemical features, fungal strain and, in particular, the target experimental species itself (Agrawal, Reference Agrawal2000; Balkema-Boomstra et al., Reference Balkema-Boomstra, Zijlstra, Verstappen, Inggamer, Mercke, Jongsma and Bouwmeester2003; Pietrosiuk et al., Reference Pietrosiuk, Furmanowa, Kropczyńska, Kawka and Wiedenfeld2003).

In our study, longevity and total lifespan of adult females treated with different LCs affected were reduced when compared with those in the control group and for both sexes a declining trend was induced by increasing the fungal concentration. Similar to our findings, Ullah et al. (Reference Ullah, Altaf, Afzal, Arshad, Mehmood, Riaz, Majeed, Ali and Abdullah2019) demonstrated that the entomopathogenic fungus I. fumosorosea strain IF-1712011 × 108 caused a significant reduction in adult longevity of a predatory bug, Rhynocoris marginatus (Fabricius) (Hem.: Reduviidae).

In our work, B. bassiana treatments failed to influence pre and total-ovipositional periods of N. californicus, but decreased the ovipositional period and total fecundity in a concentration-dependent manner, demonstrating that the potential of treated mites for population recovery would be slow. This reduction could be related to: (i) fungal colonisation of tissues such as fat body (source of vitellogeins) and ovaries (Blay and Yuval, Reference Blay and Yuval1999) and (ii) fungal toxin production disrupting cellular and humeral immune reactions (Quesada-Moraga et al., Reference Quesada-Moraga, Santos-Quirós, Valverde-García and Santiago-Alvarez2004). These results are in agreement with another study that focused on the sublethal effect (LC30) of B. bassiana ICMP 8701 on the tomato/potato psyllid (TPP), Bactericera cockerelli (Šulc) (Hem.: Triozidae) (fecundity range = 200–334 offspring/individual) (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Zhang, Beggs, Paderes, Zou and Wei2020). In contrast, Ullah and Lim (Reference Ullah and Lim2017a) and Shang et al. (Reference Shang, Chen and Bai2018) demonstrated that B. bassiana and A. hansfordii had no significant effects on the oviposition period of P. persimilis and N. barkeri, respectively.

As noted earlier for duration of developmental stages, this may again be related to predator species, or/and EPF strains. Demographical assessments have been considered as useful for investigating the dynamics of insect populations in an ecotoxicological framework, and life tables remain a useful ecological tool for evaluating the effectiveness of pest control through natural enemies and host plant resistance (Gao and Yang, Reference Gao and Yang2015).

In the current study, it was found that population parameters such as the net reproductive rate (R 0), gross reproductive rate (GRR) and mean generation time (T) in the treated (LC20 and LC30) individuals of N. californicus attacking fungal-infected prey were significantly lower than control ones. Certainly, the r value is the most significant parameter for monitoring the trend of population growth (Carey, Reference Carey1993; Moscardini et al., Reference Moscardini, da Costa Gontijo, Carvalho, de Oliveira, Maia and Silva2013). The current project showed that exposure of N. californicus to B. bassiana had no obvious effects on the intrinsic and finite rates of increase. Estimate r and λ considering the survival and reproduction data for all females, referred to as true calculation (Ganjisaffar et al., Reference Ganjisaffar, Fathipour and Kamali2011). Our findings are in agreement with B. bassiana treatment (3 × 105 conidia ml−1) on the predatory bug, Andrallus spinidens Fabricius (Hem.: Pentatomidae) where r and λ values were not significantly affected (Gholamzadeh-Chitgar et al., Reference Gholamzadeh-Chitgar, Hajizadeh, Ghadamyari, Karimi-Malati and Hoda2017). Also, population parameters of the whitefly predator, Serangium japonicum Chapin (Col.: Coccinellidae) were not affected by Verticillium lecanii (Z.) at concentrations of 1 × 104, 1 × 105, 1 × 106, 1 × 107 and 1 × 108 conidia ml−1 (Fatiha et al., Reference Fatiha, Huang, Ren and Ali2008). To further confirm our data, Xu et al. (Reference Xu, Ali, Huang, Zhou, Afzal and Bashir2009) showed no significant effects of V. lecanii (1 × 103–107 conidia ml−1) on the life table parameters of Axinoscymnus cardilobus Pang and Ren (Col.: Coccinellidae).

Greenhouse and field studies of the concurrent usage of EPF with some species of phytoseiid mites conclude that the use of predatory mites is compatible with treatments with EPF for plant pest species (Vergel et al., Reference Vergel, Bustos, Rodríguez and Cantor2011; Midthassel et al., Reference Midthassel, Leather, Wright and Baxter2016; Wu et al., Reference Wu, Gao, Smagghe, Xu and Lei2016; Saito and Brownbridge, Reference Saito and Brownbridge2018). However, combined usage may not always lead to excellent pest control when compared to using these agents on their own. Despite the negative effects of B. bassiana on some biological parameters (e.g. GRR, R 0, T, longevity, total life-span and fecundity) of N. californicus under certain conditions, more precise assessments are needed to assess the impact of this fungus on insect and mite pests and its compatibility with other natural enemies under greenhouse and field conditions. Such studies would help to identify and evaluate entomopathogenic fungi for developing biological pest control programmes.

References

Agrawal, AA (2000) Mechanisms, ecological consequences and agricultural implications of tri-trophic interactions. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 3, 329335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akca, I, Ayvaz, T, Yazici, E, Smith, CL and Chi, H (2015) Demography and population projection of Aphis fabae (Hemiptera: Aphididae): with additional comments on life table research criteria. Journal of Economic Entomology 108, 14661478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akköprü, EP, Atlıhan, R, Okut, H and Chi, H (2015) Demographic assessment of plant cultivar resistance to insect pests: a case study of the dusky-veined walnut aphid (Hemiptera: Callaphididae) on five walnut cultivars. Journal of Economic Entomology 108, 378387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akyazi, R, Soysal, M, Altunç, EY, Lisle, A, Hassan, E and Akyol, D (2018) Acaricidal and sublethal effects of tobacco leaf and garlic bulb extract and soft soap on Tetranychus urticae Koch. (Acari: Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae). Systematic and Applied Acarology 23, 20542069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alzoubi, S and Cobanoglu, S (2007) Effects of sublethal dose of different pesticides on the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch and its predatory mites under greenhouse conditions. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 3, 764770.Google Scholar
Arthurs, S and Thomas, MB (2000) Effects of a mycoinsecticide on feeding and fecundity of the brown locust Locustana pardalina. Biocontrol Science and Technology 10, 321329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azadi-Qoort, A, Sedaratian-Jahromi, A, Haghani, M and Ghane-Jahromi, M (2019) Biological responses of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) to different host plants: an investigation on bottom-up effects. Systematic and Applied Acarology 24, 659674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkema-Boomstra, AG, Zijlstra, S, Verstappen, FWA, Inggamer, H, Mercke, PE, Jongsma, MA and Bouwmeester, HJ (2003) Role of cucurbitacin C in resistance to spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Journal of Chemical Ecology 29, 225235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biondi, A, Desneux, N, Siscaro, G and Zappalà, L (2012) Using organic-certified rather than synthetic pesticides may not be safer for biological control agents: selectivity and side effects of 14 pesticides on the predator Orius laevigatus. Chemosphere 87, 803812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biondi, A, Zappalà, L, Stark, JD and Desneux, N (2013) Do biopesticides affect the demographic traits of a parasitoid wasp and its biocontrol services through sublethal effects? PLoS ONE 8, e76548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanford, S and Thomas, MB (2001) Adult survival, maturation, and reproduction of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria infected with the fungus Metarhizium anisopliae var acridum. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 78, 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blay, S and Yuval, B (1999) Oviposition and fertility in the Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae): effects of male and female body size and the availability of sperm. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 92, 278284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugeme, DM, Knapp, M, Boga, HI, Ekesi, S and Maniania, NK (2014) Susceptibility of developmental stages of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) to infection by Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae). International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 34, 190196.Google Scholar
Carey, JR (1993) Applied Demography for Biologists: with Special Emphasis on Insects. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castagnoli, M and Simoni, S (2003) Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae): survey of biological and behavioural traits of a versatile predator. Redia 86, 153164.Google Scholar
Chi, H (1988) Life-table analysis incorporating both sexes and variable development rates among individuals. Environmental Entomology 17, 2634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, H (2021) Two Sex-MSChart: A Computer Program for the Age-Stage, Two-Sex Life Table Analysis. Taichung: National Chung Hsing University. Available at http://140.120.197.173/Ecology/Download/TWOSEX-MSChart.rarGoogle Scholar
Chi, H and Liu, H (1985) Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Bulletin of Institute of Zoology Academia Sinica 24, 225240.Google Scholar
Cock, MJ, van Lenteren, JC, Brodeur, J, Barratt, BI, Bigler, F, Bolckmans, K, Cônsoli, FL, Haas, F, Mason, PG, Parra, JR (2010) Do new access and benefit sharing procedures under the convention on biological diversity threaten the future of biological control? BioControl 55, 199218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, BA (1990) Arthropod Biological Control Agents and Pesticides. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
de Faria, M and Wraight, SP (2001) Biological control of Bemisia tabaci with fungi. Crop Protection 20, 767778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Faria, MR and Wraight, SP (2007) Mycoinsecticides and mycoacaricides: a comprehensive list with worldwide coverage and international classification of formulation types. Biological Control 43, 237256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Freitas, GS, de Araújo Lira, V, Jumbo, LOV, dos Santos, FJ, Rêgo, AS and Teodoro, AV (2021) The potential of Beauveria bassiana to control Raoiella indica (Acari: Tenuipalpidae) and its compatibility with predatory mites. Crop Protection 149, 105776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desneux, N, Decourtye, A and Delpuech, JM (2007) The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology 52, 81106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dogan, YO, Hazir, S, Yildiz, A, Butt, TM and Cakmak, I (2017) Evaluation of entomopathogenic fungi for the control of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) and the effect of Metarhizium brunneum on the predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Biological Control 111, 612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, LA and Ferragut, F (2005) Life-history of predatory mites Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on four spider mite species as prey, with special reference to Tetranychus evansi (Acari: Tetranychidae). Biological Control 32, 378384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fathipour, Y, Karimi, M, Farazmand, A and Talebi, AA (2017) Age-specific functional response and predation rate of Amblyseius swirskii (Phytoseiidae) on two-spotted spider mite. Systematic and Applied Acarology 22, 159169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatiha, L, Huang, Z, Ren, SX and Ali, S (2008) Effect of Verticillium lecanii on biological characteristics and life table of Serangium japonicum (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), a predator of whiteflies under laboratory conditions. Insect Science 15, 327333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganjisaffar, F, Fathipour, Y and Kamali, K (2011) Temperature-dependent development and life table parameters of Typhlodromus bagdasarjani (Phytoseiidae) fed on two-spotted spider mite. Experimental and Applied Acarology 55, 259272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, SK and Yang, ZQ (2015) Application of life table in pest biological control. Chinese Journal of Biological Control 31, 256263.Google Scholar
Gholamzadeh-Chitgar, M, Hajizadeh, J, Ghadamyari, M, Karimi-Malati, A and Hoda, H (2017) Effect of sublethal concentration of Beauveria bassiana fungus on demographic and some biochemical parameters of predatory bug, Andrallus spinidens Fabricius (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in laboratory conditions. Trakia Journal of Sciences 15, 160167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goettel, MS and Inglis, GD (1997) Fungi: Hyphomycetes. In Lacey LA (ed.) Manual of Techniques in Insect Pathology. London: Academic Press, pp. 213249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, NM, Liljesthröm, GG, Gugole Ottaviano, MF, Cluigt, N, Cingolani, MF, Zembo, JC and Sánchez, NE (2011) Pest management plan for the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, based on the natural occurrence of the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus in strawberries. International Journal of Pest Management 57, 299308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havasi, M, Kheradmand, K, Mosallanejad, H and Fathipour, Y (2018) Sublethal effects of diflovidazin on life table parameters of two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). International Journal of Acarology 44, 115120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoy, M (2012) Biological Control in Agriculture Ipm System. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Huang, YB and Chi, H (2013) Life tables of Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae): with an invalidation of the jackknife technique. Journal of Applied Entomology 137, 327339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaoud, HA (2010) Susceptibility of poultry red mites to entomopathogens. International Journal of Poultry Science 9, 259263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khanamani, M, Fathipour, Y and Hajiqanbar, H (2013) Population growth response of Tetranychus urticae to eggplant quality: application of female age-specific and age-stage, two-sex life tables. International Journal of Acarology 39, 638648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahai, MT, Ekanayake, IJ and George, JB (1998) Leaf harvesting effects on leaf retention and pest and disease incidence of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). African Crop Science Journal 11, 107117.Google Scholar
Li, YY, Zhang, GH, Tian, CB, Liu, MX, Liu, YQ, Liu, H and Wang, JJ (2017) Does long-term feeding on alternative prey affect the biological performance of Neoseiulus barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on the target spider mites? Journal of Economic Entomology 110, 915923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, SS, Rao, A and Vinson, SB (2014) Biological control in China: past, present and future; an introduction to this special issue. Biological Control 68, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, JF, Zhang, ZQ, Beggs, JR and Wei, XY (2019) Influence of pathogenic fungi on the life history and predation rate of mites attacking a psyllid pest. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 183, 109585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, JF, Zhang, ZQ, Beggs, JR, Paderes, E, Zou, X and Wei, XY (2020) Lethal and sublethal effects of entomopathogenic fungi on tomato/potato psyllid, Bactericera cockerelli (Šulc) (Hemiptera: Triozidae) in capsicum. Crop Protection 129, 105023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMurtry, JA and Scriven, GT (1965) Life-history studies of Amblyseius limonicus, with comparative observations on Amblyseius hibisci (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 58, 106111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Međo, I, Stojnić, B and Marčić, D (2017) Acaricidal activity and sublethal effects of the microbial pesticide spinosad on Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Systematic and Applied Acarology 22, 17481762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Midthassel, A, Leather, SR, Wright, DJ and Baxter, IH (2016) Compatibility of Amblyseius swirskii with Beauveria bassiana: two potentially complimentary biocontrol agents. BioControl 61, 437447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscardini, VF, da Costa Gontijo, P, Carvalho, GA, de Oliveira, RL, Maia, JB and Silva, FF (2013) Toxicity and sublethal effects of seven insecticides to eggs of the flower bug Orius insidiosus (Say) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Chemosphere 92, 490496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nauen, R, Stumpf, N, Elbert, A, Zebitz, CPW and Kraus, W (2001) Acaricide toxicity and resistance in larvae of different strains of Tetranychus urticae and Panonychus ulmi (Acari: Tetranychidae). Pest Management Science 57, 253261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nawaz, M, Cai, W, Jing, Z, Zhou, X, Mabubu, JI and Hua, H (2017) Toxicity and sublethal effects of chlorantraniliprole on the development and fecundity of a non-specific predator, the multicolored Asian lady beetle, Harmonia axyridis (Pallas). Chemosphere 178, 496503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pietrosiuk, A, Furmanowa, M, Kropczyńska, D, Kawka, B and Wiedenfeld, H (2003) Life history parameters of the two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch) feeding on bean leaves treated with pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Journal of Applied Toxicology 23, 187190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posada, F, Aime, MC, Peterson, SW, Rehner, SA and Vega, FE (2007) Inoculation of coffee plants with the fungal entomopathogen Beauveria bassiana (Ascomycota: Hypocreales). Mycological Research 111, 748757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pozzebon, A and Duso, C (2010) Pesticide side-effects on predatory mites: the role of trophic interactions. Trends in Acarology, 465469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quesada-Moraga, E, Santos-Quirós, R, Valverde-García, P and Santiago-Alvarez, C (2004) Virulence, horizontal transmission, and sublethal reproductive effects of Metarhizium anisopliae (Anamorphic fungi) on the German cockroach (Blattodea: Blattellidae). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 87, 5158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rashki, M, Kharazi-Pakdel, A, Allahyari, H and Van Alphen, JJM (2009) Interactions among the entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana (Ascomycota: Hypocreales), the parasitoid, Aphidius matricariae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), and its host, Myzus persicae (Homoptera: Aphididae). Biological Control 50, 324328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riahi, E, Fathipour, Y, Talebi, AA and Mehrabadi, M (2017) Natural diets versus factitious prey: comparative effects on development, fecundity and life table of Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Systematic and Applied Acarology 22, 711723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, T and Brownbridge, M (2018) Compatibility of foliage-dwelling predatory mites and mycoinsecticides, and their combined efficacy against western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis. Journal of Pest Science 91, 12911300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute (2002) The SAS System for Windows. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Sedaratian, A, Fathipour, Y and Moharramipour, S (2011) Comparative life table analysis of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) on 14 soybean genotypes. Insect Science 18, 541553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedaratian, A, Fathipour, Y, Talaei-Hassanloui, R and Jurat-Fuentes, JL (2013) Fitness costs of sublethal exposure to Bacillus thuringiensis in Helicoverpa armigera: a carryover study on offspring. Journal of Applied Entomology 137, 540549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seiedy, M, Saboori, A and Allahyari, H (2012) Interactions of two natural enemies of Tetranychus urticae, the fungal entomopathogen Beauveria bassiana and the predatory mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis. Biocontrol Science and Technology 22, 873882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyed-Talebi, FS, Kheradmand, K, Talaei-Hassanloui, R and Talebi-Jahromi, K (2012) Sublethal effects of Beauveria bassiana on life table parameters of two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Biocontrol Science and Technology 22, 293303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyed-Talebi, FS, Kheradmand, K, Talaei-Hassanloui, R and Talebi-Jahromi, K (2014) Synergistic effect of Beauveria bassiana and spirodiclofen on the two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae). Phytoparasitica 42, 405412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shang, SQ, Chen, YN and Bai, YL (2018) The pathogenicity of entomopathogenic fungus Acremonium hansfordii to two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae and predatory mite Neoseiulus barkeri. Systematic and Applied Acarology 23, 21732183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, WB and Feng, MG (2004) Lethal effect of Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae, and Paecilomyces fumosoroseus on the eggs of Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Acari: Tetranychidae) with a description of a mite egg bioassay system. Biological Control 30, 165173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipp, JL, Zhang, Y, Hunt, DWA and Ferguson, G (2003) Influence of humidity and greenhouse microclimate on the efficacy of Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) for control of greenhouse arthropod pests. Environmental Entomology 32, 11541163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipp, L, Kapongo, JP, Park, HH and Kevan, P (2012) Effect of bee-vectored Beauveria bassiana on greenhouse beneficials under greenhouse cage conditions. Biological Control 63, 135142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, ZW, Zheng, Y, Zhang, BX and Li, DS (2016) Prey consumption and functional response of Neoseiulus californicus and Neoseiulus longispinosus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Tetranychus urticae and Tetranychus kanzawai (Acari: Tetranychidae). Systematic and Applied Acarology 21, 936946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, J and Preetha, G (2016) Pesticide Toxicity to Non-Target Organisms. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, JD and Banks, JE (2003) Population-level effects of pesticides and other toxicants on arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology 48, 505519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steenberg, T and Kilpinen, O (2014) Synergistic interaction between the fungus Beauveria bassiana and desiccant dusts applied against poultry red mites (Dermanyssus gallinae). Experimental and Applied Acarology 62, 511524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullah, MS and Lim, UT (2017a) Laboratory evaluation of the effect of Beauveria bassiana on the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 148, 102109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullah, MS and Lim, UT (2017b) Synergism of Beauveria bassiana and Phytoseiulus persimilis in control of Tetranychus urticae on bean plants. Systematic and Applied Acarology 22, 19241935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullah, MI, Altaf, N, Afzal, M, Arshad, M, Mehmood, N, Riaz, M, Majeed, S, Ali, S, Abdullah, A (2019) Effects of entomopathogenic fungi on the biology of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and its reduviid predator, Rhynocoris marginatus (Heteroptera: Reduviidae). International Journal of Insect Science 11, 1179543319867116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Leeuwen, T, Vontas, J, Tsagkarakou, A, Dermauw, W and Tirry, L (2010) Acaricide resistance mechanisms in the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae and other important Acari: a review. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 40, 563572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vergel, SJN, Bustos, RA, Rodríguez, CD and Cantor, RF (2011) Laboratory and greenhouse evaluation of the entomopathogenic fungi and garlic-pepper extract on the predatory mites, Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus and their effect on the spider mite Tetranychus urticae. Biological Control 57, 143149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wekesa, VW, Moraes, GD, Knapp, M and Delalibera, I Jr (2007) Interactions of two natural enemies of Tetranychus evansi, the fungal pathogen Neozygites floridana (Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales) and the predatory mite, Phytoseiulus longipes (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Biological Control 41, 408414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wraight, SP, Carruthers, RI, Jaronski, ST, Bradley, CA, Garza, CJ and Galaini-Wraight, S (2000) Evaluation of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Paecilomyces fumosoroseus for microbial control of the silverleaf whitefly, Bemisia argentifolii. Biological Control 17, 203217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, S, Gao, Y, Zhang, Y, Wang, E, Xu, X and Lei, Z (2014) An entomopathogenic strain of Beauveria bassiana against Frankliniella occidentalis with no detrimental effect on the predatory mite Neoseiulus barkeri: evidence from laboratory bioassay and scanning electron microscopic observation. PLoS ONE 9, e84732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, S, Gao, Y, Smagghe, G, Xu, X and Lei, Z (2016) Interactions between the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana and the predatory mite Neoseiulus barkeri and biological control of their shared prey/host Frankliniella occidentalis. Biological Control 98, 4351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, D, Ali, S, Huang, Z, Zhou, FC, Afzal, M and Bashir, MH (2009) Influence of the entomopathogenic fungus, Verticillium lecanii on the whitefly predator, Axinoscymnus cardilobus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) under laboratory conditions. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 41, 289295.Google Scholar
Zhao, SH (2000) Plant Chemical Protection. Beijing, China: China Agriculture Press.Google Scholar
Zheng, Y, Clercq, PD, Song, ZW, Li, DS and Zhang, BX (2017) Functional response of two Neoseiulus species preying on Tetranychus urticae Koch. Systematic and Applied Acarology 22, 10591068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, F, Ali, S and Huang, Z (2010) Influence of the entomopathogenic fungus Isaria fumosorosea on Axinoscymnus cardilobus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) under laboratory conditions. Biocontrol Science and Technology 20, 709722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, G (2007) Review on safety of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Beauveria brongniartii. Biocontrol Science and Technology 17, 553596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Age-specific survivorship (lx), age-specific fecundity (mx) and age-stage-specific fecundity (fxj) of Neoseiulus californicus at different concentrations of Beauveria bassiana.

Figure 1

Figure 2. The age-stage-specific survival rate (sxj) of Neoseiulus californicus for control and different concentrations of Beauveria bassiana.

Figure 2

Table 1. Sublethal effects of Beauveria bassiana on developmental times, adult longevity and total life span (mean ± SE) of Neoseiulus californicus

Figure 3

Table 2. Mean (±SE) reproductive periods and total fecundity of offspring from females of Neoseiulus californicus at different concentrations of Beauveria bassiana

Figure 4

Table 3. The effect of different treatments of Beauveria bassiana on the population parameters (mean ± SE) of Neoseiulus californicus