Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:52:49.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mitochondrial COI and II provide useful markers for Wiseana (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae) species identification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

B. Brown ,
R.M. Emberson  and
A.M. Paterson
B. Brown*
Affiliation:
Ecology and Entomology Group, PO Box 84, Lincoln Canterbury, New Zealand
R.M. Emberson
Affiliation:
Ecology and Entomology Group, PO Box 84, Lincoln Canterbury, New Zealand
A.M. Paterson
Affiliation:
Ecology and Entomology Group, PO Box 84, Lincoln Canterbury, New Zealand
*
*FAX: 64 3 325 3844 E-mail: brownb@lincoln.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A method for identifying the members of the endemic genus Wiseana Viette from New Zealand is described. Seven species have been described in the genus: W. cervinata (Walker), W. copularis (Meyrick), W. fuliginea (Butler), W. jocosa (Meyrick), W. mimica (Philpott), W. signata (Walker) and W. umbraculata (Guenée). No morphological characters have been identified to distinguish between the larvae of each species and adult females exhibit high levels of intra and interspecific morphological variation making identification difficult or impossible. Adult males can be distinguished by a combination of scale, antennal and genital characters, but this requires considerable taxonomic experience. Molecular markers were generated via amplification of the cytochrome oxidase subunit I and II (COI and II) of the mitochondrial DNA by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Amplified DNA was digested with restriction enzymes to give characteristic fragment patterns. Fourteen restriction enzymes were surveyed and a combination of four of these distinguish all Wiseana taxa except W. fuliginea and W. mimica.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 89 , Issue 4 , April 1999 , pp. 287 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ArchibaldR.D., R.D., (1984) Some Eugregarinida (Apicomplex) from New Zealand Melolonthinae (Scarabaeidae: Coleoptera) and Hepialidae (Lepidoptera). Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Armstrong, K.F., Cameron, C.M. & Frampton, E.R. (1997) Fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) species identification: a rapid molecular diagnostic technique for quarantine application. Bulletin of Entomological Research 87, 111–118.Google Scholar
Barlow, N.D. (1985) A model for pest assessment in New Zealand sheep pastures. Agricultural Systems 18, 1–37.Google Scholar
Barlow, N.D., French, R.A. & Pearson, J.F. (1986) Population ecology of Wiseana cervinata, a pasture pest in New Zealand. Journal of Applied Ecology 23, 415–431.Google Scholar
Barratt, B.I.P., van Toor, R.F., Ferguson, C.M. & Stewart, K.M. (1990) Grass grub and porina in Otago and Southland. Dunedin, New Zealand, The Tablet Printing Company.Google Scholar
Bogdanowicz, S.M., Wallner, W.E., Bell, J., Odell, T.M. & Harrison, R.G. (1993) Asian gypsy moths (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in North America: evidence from molecular data. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 86, 710–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, B., Dugdale, J.S., Emberson, R.E. & Paterson, A.M. (1999) Phylogeny of New Zealand hepialid moths (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae) inferred from a cladistic analysis of morphological data. Systematic Entomology 24, 1–14.Google Scholar
Brown, B., Dugdale, J.S., Emberson, R.E. & Paterson, A.M. (in press, a). Phylogeny of the ‘Oxycanus’ lineages of hepialid moths from New Zealand using sequence variation in the mtDNA COI and II gene regions. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.Google Scholar
Brown, B., Dugdale, J.S., Emberson, R.E. & Paterson, A.M. (in press, b) Phylogenetic relationships within the genus Wiseana (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae). New Zealand Journal of Zoology.Google Scholar
Crosby, T.K., Dugdale, J.S. & Watt, J.S. (1976) Recording specimen localities in New Zealand: an arbitrary system of areas and codes defined. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 3, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugdale, J.S. (1988) Lepidoptera – annotated catalogue and keys to family-group taxa. Fauna of New Zealand 14. 262 pp. Wellington, New Zealand, DSIR Science Information Publishing.Google Scholar
Dugdale, J.S. (1994) Hepialidae (Insecta: Lepidoptera). Fauna of New Zealand, Number 30. 164 pp. Lincoln, New Zealand, Manaaki Whenua Press.Google Scholar
Dumbleton, L.J. (1945) Contribution to the ecology of Oxycanus cervinata. New Zealand Journal of Science, Technology Section A 27, 114–128.Google Scholar
Dumbleton, L.J. (1966) Genitalia, classification and zoogeography of the New Zealand Hepialidae (Lepidoptera). New Zealand Journal of Science 9, 920–981.Google Scholar
Farrell, J.A.K., Sweeny, W.J. & Jones, A.E. (1974) Plant resistance to the porina caterpillar Wiseana cervinata (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae). New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 17, 373–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenemore, P.G. & Allen, V.A.L. (1969) Oviposition preference and larval survival in Wiseana cervinata (Walker), (Hepialidae). New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 12, 146–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, R.A. (1973) Some aspects of the population dynamics, biology and economic status of Wiseana cervinata (Walker) (Hepialidae: Lepidoptera). Unpublished PhD thesis, Lincoln College, Lincoln, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Herbert, J.M. (1995) Biochemical identification of Wiseana larvae and implications for pest control. Unpublished PhD thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Hudson, G.V. (1928) The butterflies and moths of New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand, Ferguson and Osborn Ltd.Google Scholar
Hugall, A., Moritz, C., Stanton, J. & Wolstenholme, D.R. (1994) Low, but strongly structured mitochondrial diversity in root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne). Genetics 136, 903–912.Google Scholar
Johnston, M. (1994) Pest leaves pasture reeling. Dairy Exporter 69, 20–22.Google Scholar
Kambhampati, S. & Rai, K.S. (1991) Variation in mitochondrial DNA of Aedes species (Diptera: Culicidae). Evolution 45, 120–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynnon Biosoft (1994–1995) DNAMAN for WindowsTM, user's guide. Sequence Analysis Software, Version 2.5, Canada, Lynnon Biosoft.Google Scholar
MacArthur, G. (1986) An electrophoretic contribution to the systematics of genus Wiseana Viette (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae). Unpublished Masters thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Mills, P.R. (1996) Use of molecular techniques for the detection and diagnostics of plant pathogens. pp. 23–32in Marshall, G. (Ed.) Diagnostics and crop protection. London, British Crop Protection Council, Number 65.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S.E., Narang, S.K., Cockburn, A.F., Seawright, J.A. & Goldenthal, M. (1992) Mitochondrial and ribosomal DNA variation among members of the Anopheles quadrimaculatus species complex. Genome 35, 939–950.Google Scholar
Parker, A. & Kornfield, I. (1996) An improved amplification and sequencing strategy for phylogenetic studies using the mitochondrial large subunit rRNA gene. Genome 39, 793–797.Google Scholar
Roehrdanz, R.L. (1997) Identification of tobacco budworm and corn earworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) during early developmental stages by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 90, 329–332.Google Scholar
Saiki, R.K., Gelfand, D.H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S.J., Higuchi, R., Horn, G.T., Mullis, K.B. & Erlich, H.A. (1988) Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science 239, 487–491.Google Scholar
Simon, C., Frati, F., Beckenbach, A., Crespi, B., Liu, H. & Flook, P. (1994) Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain-reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87, 651–701.Google Scholar
Sperling, F.A.H. & Hickey, D.A. (1994) Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation in the spruce budworm species complex (Lepidoptera: Choristoneura). Molecular Biology and Evolution 11, 656–665.Google Scholar
Sperling, F.A.H., Landry, J.-F. & Hickey, D.A. (1995) DNA-based identification of introduced ermine moth species in North America (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 88, 155–162.Google Scholar
Szalanski, A.L. & Powers, T.O. (1996) Molecular diagnostics of three Diabrotica (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) pest species. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 69, 260–266.Google Scholar
White, T.J., Bruns, T., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. pp. 315–322in Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J. & White, T.J. (Eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego, Academic Press.Google Scholar