Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T01:21:53.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nest-departure behaviour of gynes and drones in the invasive yellowjacket Vespula germanica (Hymenoptera: Vespidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2020

Andrés S. Martínez*
Affiliation:
Grupo de Ecología de Poblaciones de Insectos, IFAB - Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias Bariloche- (INTA - CONICET), Bariloche, Argentina
Natalia Rousselot
Affiliation:
Grupo de Ecología de Poblaciones de Insectos, IFAB - Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias Bariloche- (INTA - CONICET), Bariloche, Argentina
Juan C. Corley
Affiliation:
Grupo de Ecología de Poblaciones de Insectos, IFAB - Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias Bariloche- (INTA - CONICET), Bariloche, Argentina Departamento de Ecología, Centro Regional Universitario Bariloche, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Bariloche, Argentina
Maité Masciocchi
Affiliation:
Grupo de Ecología de Poblaciones de Insectos, IFAB - Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias Bariloche- (INTA - CONICET), Bariloche, Argentina
*
Author for correspondence: Andrés S. Martínez, Email: andmarv77@gmail.com

Abstract

Inbreeding costs can be high in haplodiploid hymenopterans due to their particular mechanism of sex determination (i.e., single-locus complementary sex-determination system, sl-CSD), as it can lead to the production of sterile males. Therefore, mechanisms contributing to reduced inbred matings can be beneficial. In this sense, asynchronous nest departure of sibling drones and gynes could reduce kin encounters in social hymenopterans. Using six observation colonies, we determined under field conditions the nest departure behaviour of sibling reproductives of the social wasp Vespula germanica (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). We determined that sexuals leave the nests definitively and detected asynchronous departure not fixed to a particular caste at a seasonal scale in some colonies, as gynes or drones delayed their departure as a function of the departure of the opposite sex, depending on the colony. At a higher temporal resolution (i.e., within a day), we discovered that drones consistently began to leave nests 1 h before gynes and this difference was driven by those individuals that left on the same day as did the opposite-sex kin. Even though other mechanisms such as polyandry and differential dispersal could also be important at reducing inbred matings in the species, the observed departure patterns (i.e., in some colonies actually leave together with the opposite caste, while in others temporal segregation seems to occur) from nests could be complementary to the former and be important at reducing the negative effects of inbreeding in this invasive species.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguilera-Olivares, D, Flores-Prado, L, Veliz, D and Niemeyer, HM (2015) Mechanisms of inbreeding avoidance in the one-piece drywood termite Neotermes chilensis. Insectes Sociaux 62, 237245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayasse, M, Paxton, RJ, Tengaö, J, Tengö, J and Tengaö, J (2001) Mating behavior and chemical communication in the order Hymenoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 46, 3178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beani, L, Bagnères, A, Elia, M, Petrocelli, I, Cappa, F and Lorenzi, M (2019) Cuticular hydrocarbons as cues of sex and health condition in Polistes Dominula wasps. Insectes Sociaux 66, 543553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beggs, JR, Brockerhoff, EG, Corley, JC, Kenis, M, Masciocchi, M, Muller, F, Rome, Q and Villemant, C (2011) Ecological effects and management of invasive alien Vespidae. BioControl 56, 505526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogo, G, De Manincor, N, Fisogni, A, Galloni, M, Zavatta, L and Bortolotti, L (2018) Different reproductive strategies and their possible relation to inbreeding risk in the bumble bee Bombus terrestris. Insectes Sociaux 65, 289295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, RL, El-Sayed, AM, Suckling, DM, Stringer, LD and Beggs, JR (2013) Vespula vulgaris (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) gynes use a sex pheromone to attract males. The Canadian Entomologist 145, 389397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, D and Willis, JH (2009) The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nature Reviews Genetics 10, 783796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornell, SJ and Tregenza, T (2007) A new theory for the evolution of polyandry as a means of inbreeding avoidance. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274, 28732879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derstine, NT, Ohler, B, Jimenez, SI, Landolt, P and Gries, G (2017) Evidence for sex pheromones and inbreeding avoidance in select North American yellowjacket species. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 164, 3544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimarco, RD, Masciocchi, M and Corley, JC (2017) Managing nuisance social insects in urban environments: an overview. International Journal of Pest Management 63, 251265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordham, RA, Craven, AJ and Minot, EO (1991) Phenology and population structure of annual nests of the German wasp Vespula germanica (Fab.) in Manawatu, New Zealand, with particular reference to late summer and autumn. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 18, 127137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodisman, MAD, Matthews, R and Crozier, R (2002) Mating and reproduction in the wasp Vespula germanica. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 51, 497502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, A (1991) Dolichovespula and vespula. In Ross, K and Matthews, RW (eds), The Social Biology of Wasps. Ithaca: Comstock, pp. 263305.Google Scholar
Hopper, KR (2002) Risk-spreading and bet-hedging in insect population biology. Annual Review of Entomology 44, 535560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinbaum, DG and Klein, M (2010) Survival Analysis, vol. 3. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Koeniger, N, Koeniger, G and Pechhacker, H (2005) The nearer the better? Drones (Apis mellifera) prefer nearer drone congregation areas. Insectes Sociaux 52, 3135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leathwick, DM, Godfrey, PL, Fordham, RA, and Potter, MA (1999) Comparative growth and seasonality of Vespula germanica (F.) and Vespula vulgaris (L.) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) colonies in the Manawatu region of New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 26, 2738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, PJ and Beggs, JR (2019) Invasion success and management strategies for social vespula wasps. Annual Review of Entomology 64, 5171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loope, KJ, Chien, C and Juhl, M (2014) Colony size is linked to paternity frequency and paternity skew in yellowjacket wasps and hornets. BMC Evolutionary Biology 14, 277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loyau, A, Cornuau, H, Clobert, J and Danchin, E (2012) Incestuous sisters: mate preference for brothers over unrelated males in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One 7, 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDonald, JF and Matthews, RW (1981) Nesting biology of the Eastern yellowjacket, Vespula Maculifrons (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 54, 433457.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P and Hellstrom, J (2015) An Evaluation of the Costs of Pest Wasps (Vespula species) in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Conservation and Ministry for Primary Industries, 44 p.Google Scholar
Manfredini, F, Arbetman, M and Toth, AL (2019) A potential role for phenotypic plasticity in invasions and declines of social insects. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, AS, Masciocchi, M, Villacide, JM, Pisman, N and Corley, JC (2018) Mate-searching behavior in the invasive German wasp, Vespula germanica, in Patagonia. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 166, 555564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masciocchi, M and Corley, JC (2013) Distribution, dispersal and spread of the invasive social wasp (Vespula germanica) in Argentina. Austral Ecology 38, 162168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masciocchi, M, Martínez, AS, Pereira, AJ, Villacide, JM and Corley, JC (2016) Dispersal behavior of yellowjacket (Vespula germanica) queens. Insect Science 25, 109116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazzi, D, Hatt, F, Hein, S and Dorn, S (2011) Ladies last: diel rhythmicity of adult emergence in a parasitoid with complementary sex determination. Physiological Entomology 36, 4753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morbey, Y and Ydenberg, R (2001) Protandrous arrival timing to breeding areas: a review. Ecology Letters 4, 663673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinter-Wollman, N, Gordon, DM and Holmes, S (2012) Nest site and weather affect the personality of harvester ant colonies. Behavioral Ecology 23, 10221029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pizzari, T and Wedell, N (2013) The polyandry revolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 368, 20120041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Post, DC (1980) Observations on male behavior of the eastern yellowjacket, Vespula Maculifrons (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Entomological News 91, 113116.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Reed, HC and Landolt, PJ (1990) Queens of the southern yellowjacket, Vespula squamosa, produce sex attractant (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). The Florida Entomologist 73, 687689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, G (1983) Laboratory studies of the mating biology of the eastern yellowjacket, Vespula Maculifrons (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 56, 523537.Google Scholar
Schrieber, K and Lachmuth, S (2017) The genetic paradox of invasions revisited: the potential role of inbreeding × environment interactions in invasion success. Biological Reviews 92, 939952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spradbery, JP (1973) Wasps. An Account of the Biology and Natural History of Solitary and Social Wasps. London: Eden Fisher (Sutherland) Limited.Google Scholar
Strassmann, JE (2001) The rarity of multiple mating by females in the social Hymenoptera. Insectes Sociaux 48, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabadkani, SM, Nozari, J and Lihoreau, M (2012) Inbreeding and the evolution of sociality in arthropods. Naturwissenschaften 99, 779788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, CR (1960) The European wasp (Vespula germánica Fab.) in New Zealand. Inform. Ser. Dep. Sci. Industr. Res. NZ. Wellington, NZ.Google Scholar
Tregenza, T and Wedell, N (2002) Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature 415, 7173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Veen, JW, Sommeijer, MJ and Meeuwsen, F (1997) Behaviour of drones in Melipona (Apidae, Meliponinae). Insectes Sociaux 44, 435447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wilgenburg, E, Driessen, G and Beukeboom, LW (2006) Single locus complementary sex determination in Hymenoptera: an “unintelligent” design? Frontiers in Zoology 3, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitikainen, EIK, Haag-Liautard, C and Sundström, L (2015) Natal dispersal, mating patterns, and inbreeding in the ant Formica exsecta. The American Naturalist 186, 716727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willink, A (1980) Sobre la presencia de Vespula germanica (Fabricius) en la Argentina (Himenóptera: Vespidae). Neotropica. La Plata 26, 205206.Google Scholar
Yeruham, I, Schwimmer, A and Brami, Y (2002) Epidemiological and bacteriological aspects of mastitis associated with yellow-jacket wasps (Vespula germanica) in a dairy cattle herd. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series B 49, 461463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar