Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:44:48.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Temperature and relative humidity mediated life processes of Spodoptera species (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2024

Rameswor Maharjan
Affiliation:
Crop Production Technology Research Division, Department of Southern Area Crop Science, National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration, 50424 Miryang, Republic of Korea
Seoyeon Hong*
Affiliation:
Crop Production Technology Research Division, Department of Southern Area Crop Science, National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration, 50424 Miryang, Republic of Korea
Youngnam Yoon
Affiliation:
Crop Production Technology Research Division, Department of Southern Area Crop Science, National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration, 50424 Miryang, Republic of Korea
Yunwoo Jang
Affiliation:
Crop Production Technology Research Division, Department of Southern Area Crop Science, National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration, 50424 Miryang, Republic of Korea
Kido Park
Affiliation:
Crop Production Technology Research Division, Department of Southern Area Crop Science, National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration, 50424 Miryang, Republic of Korea Department of Central Area Crop Science, National Institute of Crop Science (NICS), Rural Development Administration (RDA), 16608 Suwon, Republic of Korea
*
Corresponding author: Seoyeon Hong; Email: agriculture63@korea.kr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Anthropogenic-mediated climate change is expected to negatively affect pest management in agriculture. Hence, we investigated the oviposition, immature mortality, and developmental processes of Spodoptera species (Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) and Spodoptera litura (Fabricius)) under different temperatures (20, 25, and 30°C) and relative humidity (RH) (30–35, 50–55, 70–75, and 90–95%) conditions. For fecundity, mouths of each Spodoptera species were released into a rectangular box whose inner walls were covered with a sheet of white paper for each combination of temperature and RH. The mouths were kept inside the box to deposit eggs for 72 h. Temperature and RH significantly affected the fecundity, with the maximum number of eggs laid in 70–75% at 30°C. The highest egg and larval mortalities were recorded in 30–35 and 90–95% RH, respectively. Temperature and RH greatly affected the developmental period (egg–adult) and adult emergence rate. The rapid development was recorded in 70–75% RH at 30°C. Higher number of adults was found with an increase in temperature and RH. Adult longevity was significantly higher in 70–75% RH at 20°C. Based on the present study's findings, temperature and RH had an individual apparent effect on the developmental processes of Spodoptera species instead of an interactive effect. Therefore, there is need for an in-depth study of the influence of several climatic factors, including CO2, on the developmental modality and demographic changes of Spodoptera species to assess the impacts of climatic components and the sustainable development of management strategies.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Two Spodoptera species (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), the beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua) and the tobacco cutworm (Spodoptera litura), are economic polyphagous pests that damage a wide range of field crops, vegetables, and ornamental plants in temperate and sub-tropical regions of Asia, Australasia, and the Pacific islands (Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Cong, Wang and Lei2011; EPPO, 2013). Spodoptera species are a cosmopolitan species that feed on numerous plant species, from several families of plants (Luo and Cao, Reference Luo and Cao2000; Greenberg et al., Reference Greenberg, Sappington, Legaspi, Liu and Sétamou2001; Xue et al., Reference Xue, Pang, Wang, Li and Liu2010).

Spodoptera species generally have several instars of larvae (Ali and Gaylor, Reference Ali and Gaylor1992); starting from the fourth instar, larvae start to cause significant damage by consuming plants (Dhir et al., Reference Dhir, Mohapatra and Senapati1992; Sharma et al., Reference Sharma, Gupta, Verma, Sharma, Bhagat, Amaresan, Saini, Chattopadhyay, Sushil, Asre, Kapoor, Satyagopal and Jeyakumar2014; Dai et al., Reference Dai, Zhang and Zhang2017). Thus, plant damage from larvae is the most serious problem due to their heavy feeding tendency and insecticide-resistance development (Brewer and Trumble, Reference Brewer and Trumble1991; Ali and Gaylor, Reference Ali and Gaylor1992). Conventional insecticides are normally applied to mitigate the problem given by Spodoptera species. However, management of these pests has failed due to its rapidity in developing resistance to conventional chemical insecticides and its wide host range, higher mobility, and higher reproduction capacity (Brewer and Trumble, Reference Brewer and Trumble1991; Ali and Gaylor, Reference Ali and Gaylor1992), and a reduction in the haphazard use of broad-spectrum insecticides due to the substantial environmental concerns involved (Mascarenhas et al., Reference Mascarenhas, Graves, Leonard and Burris1998; Osorio et al., Reference Osorio, Martínez, Schneider, Díaz, Corrales, Avilés, Avilés and Pineda2008; Ahmad and Arif, Reference Ahmad and Arif2010; Lai and Su, Reference Lai and Su2011). In Korea, Spodoptera species are widespread in almost all provinces and cause significant damage to various field crops and vegetables (Kim and Shin, Reference Kim and Shin1987; Jung et al., Reference Jung, Byeon, Jung and Lee2019). Further, there is a significant threat of a potential distribution expansion of Spodoptera species on the Korean peninsula, as the species is found in a hot spot for climate change, especially global warming (Jung et al., Reference Jung, Byeon, Jung and Lee2019). The most foreseeable impacts of climate change, in particular, will have a profound effect on herbivore insect behaviour and population dynamics (Hunter, Reference Hunter2001). The severity of damage caused by any pest species depends on the rate of population increase for that species, which is influenced by temperature, humidity, and nutritional quality of the host species (Howe, Reference Howe1965; Tshiala et al., Reference Tshiala, Botai and Olwoch2012). It has been reported that the oviposition and development of Spodoptera species can be influenced by the physical/chemical attributes of the hosts as well as abiotic factors (temperature, humidity, and light) (Bae et al., Reference Bae, Park and Oh1997; Bae, Reference Bae1999; Saeed et al., Reference Saeed, Sayyed and Ahmad2010; Maharjan et al., Reference Maharjan, Ahn and Yi2022; Maharjan et al., Reference Maharjan, Hong, Ahn, Yoon, Jang, Kim, Lee, Park and Yi2023). Several studies have been conducted on different species of Spodoptera addressing the effects of temperature (Fand et al., Reference Fand, Sul, Bal and Minhas2015; Dai et al., Reference Dai, Zhang and Zhang2017; Maharjan et al., Reference Maharjan, Ahn and Yi2022, Reference Maharjan, Hong, Ahn, Yoon, Jang, Kim, Lee, Park and Yi2023). Majority of developmental the studies of Spodoptera species have done at a single RH level. Research on the combined effects of temperature and RH on life variables of Spodoptera species is scarce. Thus, we conducted this study to investigate the interactive effect of the temperature and RH conditions on oviposition, egg and larval mortality, development, adult emergence, and adult longevity of S. exigua and S. litura based on an artificial diet (Goh et al., Reference Goh, Lee, Lee, Choi and Kim1990).

Materials and methods

Laboratory insect-rearing colony

To maintain test insect colony, Spodoptera species were gathered from a soybean field at the Department of Southern Area Crop Science, NICS, RDA, Miryang, South Gyeongnam Province; 35°49′40″N, 128°74′01″E, Republic of Korea in 2020. Field larval populations were raised on an artificial medium (Goh et al., Reference Goh, Lee, Lee, Choi and Kim1990). Fresh mouths of each species were placed in different acryl cages (40L × 40W × 40H cm3, with side ventilation). Inside cage, soybean plants planted in the plastic house were provided for oviposition, and a solution of honey (10%) and water were provided as a food source. Rearing cages were placed under the room conditions (26 ± 1°C, 60 ± 5% RH, and a 16:8 h L:D photoperiod). Moreover, the test insects (Spodoptera species) used in this experiment were originally collected from a soybean field, and reared on an artificial medium for successive generations (approx. >5 generations) under the room conditions.

Experimental procedure

One pair of each Spodoptera species (sex was determined based on their morphology) (EPPO, 2015; Bandoly and Steppuhn, Reference Bandoly and Steppuhn2016) collected from the laboratory-rearing colony was released into a rectangular box (7L × 7W × 9.5H cm3, with topside ventilation) whose inner walls were covered with a sheet of white paper with food sources. Then, the rectangular box with adults was placed inside humidity chambers (27L × 20W × 17H cm3) set at one of the four different relative humidity (RH) levels (30–35, 50–55, 70–75, and 90–95%) (Winston and Bates, Reference Winston and Bates1960). Different salt compositions of MgCl2, Mg(NO3)2⋅6H2O, NaCl, and K2SO4 (Duksan Pure Chemicals, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi Province, Republic of Korea) were employed for maintaining 30–35, 50–55, 70–75, and 90–95% RH levels, respectively. Each RH-maintained chamber was then placed inside incubators (Eyela, model MTI-202B, Tokyo, Japan), and temperatures were fixed at 20, 25, and 30°C, and a 16:8 h L:D photoperiod. To measure the actual temperature and RH within the humidity chambers, a HOBO data logger (Huato Log-USB, Huato Electronic Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, China) was used. To measure fecundity, mouths were kept inside the cage for 72 h, then adult Spodoptera species were removed from the humidity chamber, and the eggs laid on the sheet of white paper were counted. Once eggs were hatched, new larvae were transferred into individual Petri dishes (5 cm dia. × 1.5 cm height, with topside ventilation) (SPL Lifesciences Co. Ltd, Gyeonggi Province, Republic of Korea) individually and fed an artificial diet. Then, the Petri dishes were wrapped with para-film, and placed inside the same temperature and RH chamber for recording the life variables of the Spodoptera species. The developmental periods from egg to adult emergence were measured, and the percentage of mouth emerged was estimated according to the overall emerged mouths from the entire number of eggs laid. Seven sets of female and male mouths were utilised for each combination of temperature and RH, and the experiment was replicated ten times for each temperature and RH condition. Once mouths developed, longevity of mouths was measured by keeping each mouth separately in Petri dishes (5 cm dia. × 1.5 cm height, with topside ventilation) (SPL Lifesciences Co. Ltd, Gyeonggi Province, Republic of Korea) at the corresponding temperatures and RH with 10% honey and water solution.

Statistical analysis

Considering temperature and RH as core factors, a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for analysing the life variables (number of eggs laid, egg mortality, larval mortality, developmental period, mouth emergence, and longevity). Tukey's test was applied as a post-hoc analysis at the P < 0.05 level of significance for the effect of temperature and RH, and its interaction (PROC GLM; SAS Institute Inc., 2002).

Results

Fecundity

For S. exigua, mouth fecundity was varied with temperature and RH (model, P < 0.0001). Temperature (P < 0.0001) and RH (P < 0.0001) significantly impacted the mouth fecundity. Similarly, combined effects of temperature and RH were also significant (P = 0.0017). Fecundity increased with an increase in temperature. The highest fecundity 402.73 (±29.9 SE) was at 30°C and 70–75% RH (fig. 1A).

Figure 1. Temperature (20, 25, and 30°C) and relative humidity (30–35, 50–55, 70–75, and 90–95%) mediated fecundity of S. exigua (A) and S. litura (B) fed on an artificial diet over a period of 72 h. Bars represent standard error. ANOVA for S. exigua: model: F 11, 348 = 84.75, P < 0.0001, temperature: F 2, 348 = 369.55, P < 0.0001, RH: F 3, 348 = 57.16, P < 0.0001, and interaction: F 6, 348 = 3.62, P = 0.0017. For S. litura: model: F 11, 348 = 138.49, P < 0.0001, temperature: F 2, 348 = 619.04, P < 0.0001, RH: F 3, 348 = 76.05, P < 0.0001, and interaction: F 6, 348 = 9.52, P = 0.0017. Means followed by the same letters are not significantly different among relative humidity levels (ANOVA, Tukey's [HSD] test, P < 0.05).

For S. litura, mouth fecundity was varied with temperature and RH (model, P < 0.0001). Temperature (P < 0.0001) and RH (P < 0.0001) significantly impacted the mouth fecundity. Combined effects of temperature and RH were also significant (P = 0.0017). Fecundity increased with an increase in temperature. The highest fecundity 438.97 (±11.8 SE) was at 30°C and 70–75% RH (fig. 1B).

Egg mortality

For S. exigua, the percentage of egg mortality was varied with temperature and RH (model, P < 0.0001). Temperature (P < 0.0001) and RH (P < 0.0001) significantly impacted on the egg mortality. Combined effects of temperature and RH were also significant (P = 0.0400). Egg mortality increased with decreasing temperature. The highest number of eggs that died was 61.91% (±5.8 SE) at 20°C and 30–35% RH (table 1).

Table 1. Temperature (20, 25, and 30°C) and relative humidity (30–35, 50–55, 70–75, and 90–95%) mediated egg and larva mortality (%), developmental period (days), and adult longevity (days) of S. exigua fed on an artificial diet

ANOVA for egg mortality: model: F 11, 2508 = 9.58; P < 0.0001, temperature: F 2, 2508 = 14.08; P < 0.0001, RH: F 3, 2508 = 21.74, P < 0.0001, and interaction: F 6, 2508 = 2.97, P = 0.0400. Larva mortality: model: F 11, 1617 = 17.11, P < 0.0001, temperature: F 2, 1617 = 2.19, P = 0.1122, RH: F 3, 1617 = 59.03, P < 0.0001, and interaction: F 6, 1617 = 1.12, P = 0.3453. Developmental period: model: F 11, 1068 = 4896.15, P < 0.0001, temperature: F 2, 1068 =  26,788.0, P < 0.0001, RH: F 3, 1068 = 10.92, P < 0.0001, and interaction: F 6, 1068 = 41.48, P < 0.0001. Adult longevity: model: F 11, 1063 = 135.70, P < 0.0001, temperature: F 2, 1063 = 657.45, P < 0.0001, RH: F 3, 1063 = 61.15, P < 0.0001, and interaction: F 6, 1063 = 0.00, P = 0.0000. Means (±SE) followed by the same capital letters in a row and same small letters in a column are not significantly different among temperature regimes and relative humidity levels, respectively (ANOVA, Tukey's [HSD] test, P < 0.05).

For S. litura, the percentage of egg mortality was varied with temperature and RH (model, P < 0.0001). Temperature (P < 0.0001) and RH (P < 0.0001) significantly impacted the egg morality. However, combined effects of temperature and RH were not significant (P = 0.1262). Egg mortality increased with decreasing temperature. The highest number of eggs that died was 58.10% (±5.8 SE) at 20°C and 30–35% RH (table 2).

Table 2. Temperature (20, 25, and 30°C) and relative humidity (30–35, 50–55, 70–75, and 90–95%) mediated egg and larva mortality (%), developmental period (days), and adult longevity (days) of S. litura fed on an artificial diet

ANOVA for egg mortality: model: F 11, 2508 = 8.97, P < 0.0001, temperature: F 2, 2508 = 17.44, P < 0.0001, RH: F 3, 2508 = 17.95, P < 0.0001, and interaction: F 6, 2508 = 1.66, P = 0.1262. Larva mortality: model: F 11, 1737 = 12.54, P < 0.0001, temperature: F 2, 1737 = 0.69, P = 0.5036, RH: F 3, 1737 = 38.80, P < 0.0001, and interaction: F 6, 1737 = 3.37, P = 0.0026. Developmental period: model: F 11, 1222 = 1264.16, P < 0.0001, temperature: F 2, 1222 = 6842.65, P < 0.0001, RH: F 3, 1222 = 32.33, P < 0.0001, and interaction: F 6, 1222 = 20.58, P < 0.0001. Adult longevity: model: F 11, 1222 = 290.08, P < 0.0001, temperature: F 2, 1222 = 1460.40, P < 0.0001, RH: F 3, 1222 = 90.54, P < 0.0001, and interaction: F 6, 1222 = 0.00, P = 1.0000. Means (±SE) followed by the same capital letters in a row and same small letters in a column are not significantly different among temperature regimes and relative humidity levels, respectively (ANOVA, Tukey's [HSD] test, P < 0.05).

Larval mortality

For S. exigua, the percentage of larval mortality was varied with temperature and RH (model, P < 0.0001). RH (P < 0.0001) significantly impacted the larval mortality. However, temperature (P = 0.1122) and the combined effects of temperature and RH did not significantly impacted the larval mortality (P = 0.3453). The highest percentage of larvae that died was 60.13% (±6.9 SE) at 30°C and 90–95% RH (table 1).

For S. litura, the percentage of larval mortality was varied with temperature and RH (model, P < 0.0001). RH (P < 0.0001) and interactions between temperature and RH significantly impacted the larval mortality (P = 0.0026). However, temperature did not significantly impacted the larval morality (P = 0.5036). The highest number of larvae that died was 53.46% (±10.7 SE) at 30°C and 90–95% RH (table 2).

Developmental period

For S. exigua, the developmental period of adult mouths varied with temperature and RH (model, P < 0.0001). Temperature (P < 0.0001) and RH (P < 0.0001) significantly impacted the developmental period of mouths. Similarly, the combined effects of temperature and RH were also significant (P < 0.0001). Developmental period decreased with increasing temperature and RH. The developmental period was shortest (16.49 days ± 0.2 SE) at 30°C and 70–75% RH (table 1).

For S. litura, the developmental period of adult mouths varied with temperature and RH (model, P < 0.0001). Temperature (P < 0.0001) and RH (P < 0.0001) significantly impacted the developmental period of mouths. Similarly, the combined effects of temperature and RH were also significant (P < 0.0001). Developmental period decreased with increasing temperature and RH. The developmental period was shortest (25.60 days ± 0.4 SE) at 30°C and 70–75% RH (table 2).

Adult emergence

For S. exigua, the adult emergence rate varied with temperature and RH (model, P < 0.0001). Temperature (P < 0.0001) and RH (P < 0.0001) significantly impacted the adult emergence rate. However, the combined effects of temperature and RH were not significant (P = 0.1461). Adult emergence rate increased with increasing temperature and RH. The highest adult emergence rate was 61.52% (±5.8 SE) at 30°C and 70–75% RH (fig. 2A).

Figure 2. Temperature (20, 25, and 30°C) and relative humidity (30–35, 50–55, 70–75, and 90–95%) mediated adult emergence rate of S. exigua (A) and S. litura (B) fed on an artificial diet. Bars represent standard error. ANOVA for S. exigua: model: F 11, 2508 = 12.54, P < 0.0001, temperature: F 2, 2508 = 16.95, P < 0.0001, RH: F 3, 2508 = 31.52, P < 0.0001, and interaction: F 6, 2508 = 1.59, P = 0.1461. For S. litura: model: F 11, 2508 = 13.15, P < 0.0001, temperature: F 2, 2508 = 13.17, P < 0.0001, RH: F 3, 2508 = 34.92, P < 0.0001, and interaction: F 6, 2508 = 2.27, P = 0.0349. Means followed by the same letters are not significantly different among relative humidity levels (ANOVA, Tukey's [HSD] test, P < 0.05).

For S. litura, the adult emergence rate varied with temperature and RH (model, P < 0.0001). Temperature (P < 0.0001) and RH (P < 0.0001) significantly impacted the adult emergence. Similarly, the combined effects of temperature and RH were also significant (P = 0.0349). Adult emergence rate increased with increasing temperature and RH. The highest adult emergence rate was 71.91% (±5.4 SE) at 30°C and 70–75% RH (fig. 2B).

Adult longevity

For S. exigua, the adult longevity varied with temperature and RH (model, P < 0.0001). Temperature (P < 0.0001) and RH (P < 0.0001) significantly impacted the adult longevity. However, the combined effects of temperature and RH were not significant (P = 1.0000). The highest adult longevity was 12.86 days (±0.2 SE) at 20°C and 70–75% RH (table 1).

For S. litura, the adult longevity varied with temperature and RH (model, P < 0.0001). Temperature (P < 0.0001) and RH (P < 0.0001) significantly impacted the adult longevity. However, the combined effects of temperature and RH were not significant (P = 1.0000). The highest adult longevity was 11.10 days (±0.2 SE) at 20°C and 70–75% RH (table 2).

Discussion

The outcomes of this study suggest that both Spodoptera species could complete their life cycle on all tested temperatures and RH conditions. However, the influences of environmental conditions such as temperature and RH significantly varied on the life variables and adult performance of Spodoptera species. The present study shows that temperature emphatically affects all the life variables except for larval mortality, while RH affects all the life variables, such as oviposition, egg and larval survival, developmental period, adult emergence, and adult longevity, of both Spodoptera species. In addition to larval mortality and adult longevity for both Spodoptera species, combined effects of temperature and RH were recorded on the egg morality for S. exigua and adult emergence for S. litura.

Among the tested temperature and RH conditions, 30°C and 70–75% RH proved to be the furthermost optimal environmental conditions for fecundity and normal development of both Spodoptera species. We found that fecundity was emphatically decreased at minimal temperature. Previous studies reported that Spodoptera species laid a higher number of eggs at 25–30°C (Gupta et al., Reference Gupta, Rani, Birah and Raghuraman2007; Mehrkhou et al., Reference Mehrkhou, Talebi, Moharramipour, Naveh and Farahani2012; Jaba et al., Reference Jaba, Mishra, Arora and Munghate2020), similar to our results. In the present study, Spodoptera species successfully laid eggs at a lower temperature (20°C), though it was the lowest number of eggs among the temperatures. In line with our findings, Choi and Park (Reference Choi and Park2000) reported a lower number of eggs laid by S. exigua at a lower temperature (16°C). Nevertheless, Lee et al. (Reference Lee, Ahn, Cho and Choi1991) reported a maximum number of eggs laid by S. exigua at a lower temperature (20°C). This fecundity discrepancy may be associated with relative humidity along with temperature. Several studies reported that different temperatures and RH have significant effects on the oviposition of Spodoptera species (Shuqing, Reference Shuqing2002; Jaba et al., Reference Jaba, Mishra, Arora and Munghate2020).

Being a poikilothermic organism, insects are physiologically sensitive to external environmental factors, and temperature is the most significant factor influencing the overall developmental processes of insects (Taylor, Reference Taylor1981; Bale et al., Reference Bale, Masters, Hodkinson, Awmack, Bezemer, Brown, Butterfield, Buse, Coulson, Farrar, Good, Harrington, Hartley, Jones, Lindroth, Press, Symrnioudis, Watt and Whittaker2002). Previous studies reported that RH affects the success of the egg hatchability of insect species (Holmes et al., Reference Holmes, Vanlaerhoven and Tomberlin2012; Norhisham et al., Reference Norhisham, Abood, Rita and Hakeem2013). Norhisham et al. (Reference Norhisham, Abood, Rita and Hakeem2013) reported that egg mortality was highest at lower RH levels in Dinoderus minutus Fabricius (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae). In line with earlier studies, we report here that there is higher egg mortality at lower (30–35%) rather than higher (90–95%) RH levels. Wigglesworth (Reference Wigglesworth1984) reported that water loss through the egg and pupal membranes due to low RH can be responsible for inhibiting the survival and normal development of holometabolous insects, resulting in desiccation. We believe that the detrimental effects on egg eclosion success caused by lower RH could be associated with desiccation. This phenomenon is supported by Clark and Faeth (Reference Clark and Faeth1997, Reference Clark and Faeth1998), where the authors noticed that eggs on the surface of egg clusters were desiccated, while eggs within the egg cluster were not. Previous studies indicated lower larval survival of Spodoptera species in higher temperature and RH (Jaba et al., Reference Jaba, Mishra, Arora and Munghate2020; Maharjan et al., Reference Maharjan, Hong, Ahn, Yoon, Jang, Kim, Lee, Park and Yi2023). In line with previous studies on Spodoptera species, we also found higher larval mortality in high humidity (90–95%) at all temperature regimes, and humidity levels (>90%) negatively affected larval survival. During microscopic observation, we noticed dead larvae with a higher amount of water within the larval body and fungal spores on the outer surface of the body. Thus, we believe that larval death could be caused by RH-assisted mould formation.

Earlier studies revealed that temperature and RH (Ranga Rao et al., Reference Ranga Rao, Wightman and Ranga Rao1989; Jaba et al., Reference Jaba, Mishra, Arora and Munghate2020; Rao and Prasad, Reference Rao and Prasad2020; Maharjan et al., Reference Maharjan, Ahn and Yi2022, Reference Maharjan, Hong, Ahn, Yoon, Jang, Kim, Lee, Park and Yi2023; Malekera et al., Reference Malekera, Acharya, Mostafiz, Hwang, Bhusal and Lee2022) are potential factors influencing the life processes of Spodoptera species. A top of Spodoptera species, the influence of temperature and RH, and their interaction on the life variables of other insect species such as Spotted stem borer (Chilo partellus) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) and rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) was also reported by previous studies (Tamiru et al., Reference Tamiru, Getu, Jembere and Bruce2012; Hasan et al., Reference Hasan, Aslam, Jafir, Javed, Shehzad, Chaudhary and Aftab2017). In line with the findings of these earlier studies, the findings of this study indicated that the developmental period of Spodoptera species was shorter with the increase in temperature. We also suggest here that the increment in RH from 30–35 to 70–75% reduced the developmental period and enhanced the adult emergence. However, extreme RH levels (lower (30–35%) and higher (>90%)) adversely impacted the emergence rate of adults, which is in agreement with Wigglesworth (Reference Wigglesworth1984), who reported that low RH results in water loss through egg cells and pupal membranes, which can lead to desiccation and be a detrimental means for the success of insect survival, which could also partly be linked to higher mortality of larvae driven by fungal infections. Further, the distinct effects of temperature and RH rather than the interactive effect might be responsible for the deleterious impact on the adult emergence. Earlier research indicated that temperature plays a more significant part than RH in the life processes of Spodoptera species (Ranga Rao et al., Reference Ranga Rao, Wightman and Ranga Rao1989; Bale et al., Reference Bale, Masters, Hodkinson, Awmack, Bezemer, Brown, Butterfield, Buse, Coulson, Farrar, Good, Harrington, Hartley, Jones, Lindroth, Press, Symrnioudis, Watt and Whittaker2002). As with other life variables, temperature and RH also influenced the longevity of adult Spodoptera species (Ranga Rao et al., Reference Ranga Rao, Wightman and Ranga Rao1989; Rao and Prasad, Reference Rao and Prasad2020; Maharjan et al., Reference Maharjan, Ahn and Yi2022, Reference Maharjan, Hong, Ahn, Yoon, Jang, Kim, Lee, Park and Yi2023), which is in line with the findings of previous studies; we observed inverse effects of temperature on adult longevity, and we found higher adult longevity of Spodoptera species in 70–75% RH at 20°C. Significant factors confirming insects' longevity are still unknown. Among the significant factors, temperature is considered as one of the most influential factors regulating the lifespan of insect species. In addition to temperature, genetic background, physiology and metabolic processes, and nutrients and chemical compounds available on host plants may also influence the adult longevity of insect species (Kenyon, Reference Kenyon2010; Maharjan et al., Reference Maharjan, Ahn and Yi2022, Reference Maharjan, Hong, Ahn, Yoon, Jang, Kim, Lee, Park and Yi2023).

Here, we reported that both the temperature and the RH are significant factors that have central roles in the developmental processes and adult performance of Spodoptera species, however, the way that temperature and relative humidity interact depends on certain life variables of Spodoptera species. This study showed that a temperature of 30°C and RH of 70–75% were optimal conditions for overall development of Spodoptera species. Temperature had the greatest effect on the life variables of Spodoptera species, though the effect of RH was minimal with occasional statistical significance for some variables. This study suggests that immature stages (especially egg and larva) are more sensitive to RH. Information on egg and larval mortality indicates that the effect of RH is important when an insect is in an immature stage and in a stressed state due to adverse temperature. Further, the outcomes of this study demonstration that Spodoptera species are supposed to cause significant damage to the field crops and vegetables grown under environmental conditions (temperature around 30°C and 70–75% RH). Lastly, information generated from this study can be integrated with other management strategies for the management of Spodoptera species.

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted with help of the Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development grant (No. PJ01571901), National Institute of Crop Science (NICS), Rural Development Administration (RDA), Jeongju, Republic of Korea. The authors thank Mr Jin Guk Choi and Mr Dae Jin Kim, NICS, RDA, Miryang, Republic of Korea for assisting in the rearing of test insect species for this study.

Author contributions

R. M. and S. H.: conceptualisation; methodology; software; formal analysis; writing – original draft; visualisation. Y. J. and Y. Y.: data curation; writing – review and editing. Y. J., Y. Y., and K. P.: supervision. Y. Y., S. H., and K. P.: project administration; funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

None.

References

Ahmad, M and Arif, MI (2010) Resistance of beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to endosulfan organophosphorus and pyrethroid insecticides in Pakistan. Crop Protection 29, 14281433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, A and Gaylor, MJ (1992) Effects of temperature and larval diets on development of the beet armyworm. Environmental Entomology 21, 780786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bae, SD (1999) Leaf characteristics of leguminous plants and the biology of tobacco cutworm, Spodoptera litura Fabricius: I. The larval development and leaf feeding amount. Korean Journal of Applied Entomology 38, 217224.Google Scholar
Bae, SD, Park, KB and Oh, YJ (1997) The effects of temperature and food source on the egg and larval development of tobacco cutworm, Spodoptera litura Fabricius. Korean Journal of Applied Entomology 36, 4854.Google Scholar
Bale, JS, Masters, GJ, Hodkinson, ID, Awmack, C, Bezemer, TM, Brown, VK, Butterfield, J, Buse, A, Coulson, JC, Farrar, J, Good, JEG, Harrington, R, Hartley, S, Jones, TH, Lindroth, RL, Press, MC, Symrnioudis, I, Watt, AD and Whittaker, JB (2002) Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores. Global Change Biology 8, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandoly, M and Steppuhn, A (2016) Bioassays to investigate the effects of insect oviposition on a plant's resistance to herbivores. Bio-Protocol 6, e1823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, MJ and Trumble, JT (1991) Inheritance and fitness consequences of resistance to fenvalerate in Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 84, 16381644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, JS and Park, YD (2000) Effects of some temperatures on larval development, adult longevity, and oviposition of the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua Hübner. Korean Journal of Life Science 10, 16.Google Scholar
Clark, BR and Faeth, SH (1997) The consequences of larval aggregation in the butterfly Chlosyne lacinia. Ecological Entomology 22, 408415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, BR and Faeth, SH (1998) The evolution of egg clustering in butterflies: a test of the egg desiccation hypothesis. Evolutionary Ecology 12, 543552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, HQ, Zhang, GL and Zhang, WJ (2017) Temperature dependent development parameters and population life table of beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Arthropods 6, 117125.Google Scholar
Dhir, BC, Mohapatra, HK and Senapati, B (1992) Assessment of crop loss in groundnut due to tobacco caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (F.). Indian Journal of Plant Protection 20, 215217. Available at https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:82790324Google Scholar
EPPO (2013) 2013 PQR Database: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization, Paris, France. Retrieved from http://www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htmGoogle Scholar
EPPO (2015) Spodoptera littoralis, Spodoptera litura, Spodoptera frugiperda, Spodoptera eridania. EPPO Bulletin 45, 410444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fand, BB, Sul, NT, Bal, SK and Minhas, PS (2015) Temperature impacts the development and survival of common cutworm (Spodoptera litura): simulation and visualization of potential population growth in India under warmer temperatures through life cycle modelling and spatial mapping. PLoS ONE 10, e0124682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goh, HG, Lee, SG, Lee, BP, Choi, KM and Kim, JH (1990) Simple mass-rearing of beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), on artificial diet. Korean Journal of Applied Entomology 29, 180183.Google Scholar
Greenberg, SM, Sappington, TW, Legaspi, BCJ, Liu, TX and Sétamou, M (2001) Feeding and life history of Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on different host plants. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 94, 566575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, GP, Rani, S, Birah, A and Raghuraman, M (2007) Improved artificial diet for mass rearing of the tobacco caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 25, 5558.Google Scholar
Hasan, M, Aslam, A, Jafir, M, Javed, MW, Shehzad, M, Chaudhary, MZ and Aftab, M (2017) Effect of temperature and relative humidity on development of Sitophilus oryzae L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 5, 8590.Google Scholar
Holmes, LA, Vanlaerhoven, SL and Tomberlin, JK (2012) Relative humidity effects on the life history of Hermetia illucens (Diptera: Stratiomyidae). Environmental Entomology 41, 971978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, RW (1965) A summary of estimates of optimal and minimal conditions for population increase of some stored products insects. Journal of Stored-Products Research 1, 177184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, MD (2001) Effects of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide on insect–plant interactions. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 3, 153159. Available at http://www.ecology.uga.edu./hunter.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaba, J, Mishra, SP, Arora, N and Munghate, R (2020) Impact of variegated temperature, CO2 and relative humidity on survival and development of beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) under controlled growth chamber. American Journal of Climate Change 9, 357370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, JM, Byeon, DH, Jung, S and Lee, WH (2019) Effect of climate change on the potential distribution of the common cutworm (Spodoptera litura) in South Korea. Entomological Research 49, 519528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, CJ (2010) The genetics of ageing. Nature 464, 504512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, CH and Shin, HY (1987) Studies on bionomics and control of tobacco cutworm, Spodoptera litura Fabricius in southern part of Korea. Journal of Institute of Agriculture and Resource Utility-Gyeongsang National University 21, 105122.Google Scholar
Lai, T and Su, J (2011) Assessment of resistance risk in Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to chlorantraniliprole. Pest Management Science 67, 14681472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, SD, Ahn, SB, Cho, WS and Choi, KM (1991) Effects of temperature on the development of beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Research Report of RDA, Crop Protection 33, 5862.Google Scholar
Luo, LZ and Cao, YZ (2000) Studies on the Spodoptera exigua occurrence, damage characteristics and the trend analysis. Plant Protection 26, 3739.Google Scholar
Maharjan, R, Ahn, J and Yi, H (2022) Interactive effects of temperature and plant host on the development parameters of Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Insects 13, 747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maharjan, R, Hong, S, Ahn, J, Yoon, Y, Jang, Y, Kim, J, Lee, M, Park, K and Yi, H (2023) Temperature and host plant impacts on the development of Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): linear and nonlinear modeling. Insects 14, 412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malekera, MJ, Acharya, R, Mostafiz, MM, Hwang, H-S, Bhusal, N and Lee, K-Y (2022) Temperature-dependent development models describing the effects of temperature on the development of the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Insects 13, 1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mascarenhas, VJ, Graves, JB, Leonard, BR and Burris, E (1998) Susceptibility of field populations of beet armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to commercial and experimental insecticides. Journal of Economic Entomology 91, 827833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrkhou, F, Talebi, AA, Moharramipour, S, Naveh, VH and Farahani, S (2012) Development and fecundity of Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on different soybean cultivars. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 45, 9098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norhisham, AR, Abood, F, Rita, M and Hakeem, KR (2013) Effect of humidity on egg hatchability and reproductive biology of the bamboo borer (Dinoderus minutus Fabricius). SpringerPlus 2, 9. PMID:23419805; PMCID: PMC3569590. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osorio, A, Martínez, AM, Schneider, MI, Díaz, O, Corrales, JL, Avilés, MC, Avilés, GS and Pineda, S (2008) Monitoring of beet army-worm resistance to spinosad and methoxyfenozide in Mexico. Pest Management Science 64, 10011007. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-690619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranga Rao, GV, Wightman, JA and Ranga Rao, DV (1989) Threshold temperatures and thermal requirements for the development of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environmental Entomology 18, 548551.Google Scholar
Rao, MS and Prasad, TV (2020) Temperature based phenology model for predicting establishment and survival of Spodoptera litura (Feb.) on groundnut during climate change scenario in India. Journal of Agrometeorology 22, 2432.Google Scholar
Saeed, S, Sayyed, AH and Ahmad, I (2010) Effect of host plants on life-history traits of Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Pest Science 83, 165172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. (2002) SAS Use's Guide. Statistics; SAS, Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Sharma, AN, Gupta, GK, Verma, RK, Sharma, OP, Bhagat, S, Amaresan, N, Saini, MR, Chattopadhyay, C, Sushil, SN, Asre, R, Kapoor, KS, Satyagopal, K and Jeyakumar, P (2014) Integrated pest management package for soybean; Directorate of Plant Protection, Quarantine and Storage: Faridabad, India, p. 41.Google Scholar
Shuqing, L (2002) Effect of temperature and humidity on the development of Spodoptera exigua (Hübner). Journal of Huazhong (Central China) Agriculture University 21, 352355.Google Scholar
Tamiru, A, Getu, E, Jembere, B and Bruce, T (2012) Effect of temperature and relative humidity on the development and fecundity of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 102, 915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, F (1981) Ecology and evolution of physiological time in insects. American Naturalist 117, 123. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/2460694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tshiala, MF, Botai, JO and Olwoch, JM (2012) Leaf miner Agromyzid pest distribution over Limpopo Province under changing climate. African Journal of Agricultural Research 7, 65156522.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, VB (1984) Insect Physiology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, p. 202.Google Scholar
Winston, PW and Bates, DH (1960) Saturated solutions for the control of humidity in biological research. Ecology 41, 232237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, M, Pang, YH, Wang, HT, Li, QL and Liu, TX (2010) Effects of four host plants on biology and food utilization of the cutworm, Spodoptera litura. Journal of Insect Science 10, 22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, XL, Cong, XP, Wang, XP and Lei, CL (2011) A review of geographic distribution, overwintering and migration in Spodoptera exigua Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of the Entomological Research Society 13, 3948. Available at https://www.entomol.org/journal/index.php/JERS/article/view/327Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Temperature (20, 25, and 30°C) and relative humidity (30–35, 50–55, 70–75, and 90–95%) mediated fecundity of S. exigua (A) and S. litura (B) fed on an artificial diet over a period of 72 h. Bars represent standard error. ANOVA for S. exigua: model: F11, 348 = 84.75, P < 0.0001, temperature: F2, 348 = 369.55, P < 0.0001, RH: F3, 348 = 57.16, P < 0.0001, and interaction: F6, 348 = 3.62, P = 0.0017. For S. litura: model: F11, 348 = 138.49, P < 0.0001, temperature: F2, 348 = 619.04, P < 0.0001, RH: F3, 348 = 76.05, P < 0.0001, and interaction: F6, 348 = 9.52, P = 0.0017. Means followed by the same letters are not significantly different among relative humidity levels (ANOVA, Tukey's [HSD] test, P < 0.05).

Figure 1

Table 1. Temperature (20, 25, and 30°C) and relative humidity (30–35, 50–55, 70–75, and 90–95%) mediated egg and larva mortality (%), developmental period (days), and adult longevity (days) of S. exigua fed on an artificial diet

Figure 2

Table 2. Temperature (20, 25, and 30°C) and relative humidity (30–35, 50–55, 70–75, and 90–95%) mediated egg and larva mortality (%), developmental period (days), and adult longevity (days) of S. litura fed on an artificial diet

Figure 3

Figure 2. Temperature (20, 25, and 30°C) and relative humidity (30–35, 50–55, 70–75, and 90–95%) mediated adult emergence rate of S. exigua (A) and S. litura (B) fed on an artificial diet. Bars represent standard error. ANOVA for S. exigua: model: F11, 2508 = 12.54, P < 0.0001, temperature: F2, 2508 = 16.95, P < 0.0001, RH: F3, 2508 = 31.52, P < 0.0001, and interaction: F6, 2508 = 1.59, P = 0.1461. For S. litura: model: F11, 2508 = 13.15, P < 0.0001, temperature: F2, 2508 = 13.17, P < 0.0001, RH: F3, 2508 = 34.92, P < 0.0001, and interaction: F6, 2508 = 2.27, P = 0.0349. Means followed by the same letters are not significantly different among relative humidity levels (ANOVA, Tukey's [HSD] test, P < 0.05).