Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-20T07:49:51.057Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A diagonal dominance criterion for exponential dichotomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Kenneth J. Palmer
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Institute of Advanced Studies, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Roughly speaking, a system of linear differential equations has an exponential dichotomy if it has a subspace of solutions shrinking exponentially and a complementary subspace of solutions growing exponentially. In the case of constant coefficients, this happens if and only if the eigenvalues of the coefficient matrix have nonzero real parts. In the general case, Lazer has shown that if the coefficient matrix function is bounded and satisfies a diagonal dominance condition (which, in the constant case, is a sufficient but not necessary condition that the eigenvalues have nonzero real parts) then the system has an exponential dichotomy. In this paper we prove the same result with a weaker diagonal dominance condition, thus generalizing a theorem of Nakajima.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1977

References

[1]Berkey, Dennis D., “Comparative exponential dichotomies and column diagonal dominance”, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 55 (1976), 140149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Lazer, A.C., “Characteristic exponents and diagonally dominant linear differential systems”, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 35 (1971), 215229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Nakajima, F., “Stability criterion, of diagonal dominance type” (preprint, Mathematical Institute of Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, 1976).Google Scholar
[4]Varga, Richard S., Matrix iterative analysis (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1962).Google Scholar