Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:50:25.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On certain abelian-by-nilpotent varieties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

J.M. Brady ,
R.A. Bryce  and
John Cossey
J.M. Brady
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra, ACT.
R.A. Bryce
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra, ACT.
John Cossey
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra, ACT.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We show that, whenever m, n are coprime, each subvariety of the abelian-by-nilpotent variety has a finite basis for its laws. We further Show that the just non-Cross subvarieties of are precisely those already known.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , December 1969 , pp. 403 - 416
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1969

References

[1]Curtis, Charles W. and Reiner, Irving, Representation theory of finite groups and associative algebras (interscience, New York, 1962).Google Scholar
[2]Higman, Graham, “Some remarks on varieties of groups”, Quart. J. Math., Oxford (2) 10 (1959), 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Higman, Graham, “The orders of relatively free groups”, Proc. Internat. Conf. Theory of Groups, Austral. Nat. Univ., Canberra, 1965 (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1967).Google Scholar
[4]Kovács, L.G. and Newman, M.F., “Just non-Cross varieties”, Proc. Internat. Conf. Theory of Groups, Austral. Nat, Univ., Canberra, 1965 (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1967).Google Scholar
[5]Neumann, Hanna, Varieties of groups (Ergetmisse der Mathematik, und ihrer Grenzgebiete, Band 37, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Newman, M.F., “On a class of nilpotent groups”, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 10 (1960), 365–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar