Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:19:40.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ulrike Mosel: Die syntaktische Terminologie bei Sībawaih. Inaugural-Dissertation … Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität zu München. 2 vols.: [ii], xiii, 363 pp. + errata sheet; [ii], 45 pp. München: Dissertations-und Fotodruck Frank oHG, 1975.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Al-Ḫalil ibn-Aḥmad, der Lehrer Sībawaihs, als Grammatiker, Berlin, 1959.Google Scholar See also my own review of that work in BSOAS, xxv, 2, 1902, 343–7.Google Scholar

2 Paris ed., § 81.

3 Paris ed., I, 377.1.

4 The Arabic language today, London, 1970, 104.Google Scholar

5 e.g. Strawson, P. F., Subject and predicate in logic and grammar, Oxford, 1974, 32.Google Scholar

6 Such as the contrastive form marartu bi-zaydin wa-'amran marartu bihī, discussed in my review of Reuschel cited in n. 1. Incidentally, it may be worth noting that here S. does distinguish between subject and object function, explaining ‘amran as object of an implied (muqaddar) verb.

7 The Arabic language today, 63–6, and specially p. 65, n. 1.Google Scholar