Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T07:35:30.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Ramtek inscriptions1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Extract

The hill of Ramtek (21°.28´N, 79°.28´E), c. 45 km. NE of Nagpur (Maharashtra), merits special attention because it appears to be one of the very few places in India where an uninterrupted historical development from the fourth century A.D. to the present day can be investigated through a series of archaeological monuments which, although partly restored or built over in later periods, seem never to have been exposed to destructive and iconoclastic forces. From at least the fifth century onwards the hill, also known as Rāmagiri, Sindūragiri, or Tapamgiri (Tapogiri), served as a regional centre of religious activity and probably, also had a more secular function as an outstanding strategic base controlling the highway that connected, and still connects, the central and eastern part of the basin of the Ganges with the northern Deccan. This could possibly explain, at least in part, why the religious structures on top of the hill have attracted the attention and care of the rulers of the area from a very early date.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography and Abbreviations

Arch. Survey of Western India = Archaeological Survey of Western India, Vol. III. Report on the Antiquities in the Bidar and Aurangabad Districts, in the territories of His Highness the Nizam of Haidarabad, being the result of the third season's operations of the Archaeological Survey of Western India 1875–76 by James Burgess. London, 1878.Google Scholar
Ayachit, S. M. V.SM.Google Scholar
Bakker, Hans. ‘The antiquities of Ramtek Hill (Maharashtra)’, Journal of South Asian Studies, 5, 1989 (forthcoming (a)).Google Scholar
Bakker, Hans ‘Ramtek: an ancient centre of Visnu devotion in Maharashtra’, in: The history of sacred places as reflected in traditional literature: Papers on pilgrimage in South Asia presented in a workshop held at the VHth World Sanskrit Conference (Leiden, August 2329, 1987), ed. Hans, Bakker. Leiden (forthcoming (b))Google Scholar
Bhandarkar, Ramkrishna Gopal. Early history of the Dekkan: down to the Mahomedan conquest. Calcutta, 1928 (3rd. ed.).Google Scholar
Bombay Gaz. = Gazetteer of the Bombay Presidency. Under Government Orders. Vol. I. Bombay, 1896.Google Scholar
Brown, Percy. Indian architecture (Buddhist and Hindu periods). Bombay, 1976.Google Scholar
Bühler, G.. Indische Palaeography. Von circa 350 A. Chr.—circa 1300 P. Chr. Grundriss der Indo- Arischen Philologie und Altertumskunde, 1. Bd., 11. Ht. Strassbourg, 1896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CII = Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum. Vol. v. Ooctamund, 1963.Google Scholar
Cousens, Henry., Mediaeval temples of the Dakhan. Calcutta, 1931.Google Scholar
Dani, Ahmad Hasan.. Indian palaeography. Oxford, 1963.Google Scholar
Deglurkar, G. B.. Temple architecture and sculpture of Maharashtra. Nagpur, 1974.Google Scholar
Deo, S. B.. and M. K., Dhavalikar, Paunar Excavation (1967). Nagpur, 1968.Google Scholar
Deshpande, Suresh Raghunath. Yadava sculpture (Western Maharashtra: 1000 A.D. to 1400 A.D.). Delhi, 1985.Google Scholar
El = Epigraphia Indica. Calcutta/Bombay, 18921969. 37 vols.Google Scholar
Elliot, H. M.. and John, Dowson. The History of India as told by its own historians: The Muhammadan period. The posthumous papers of H. M. Elliot edited and continued by John Dowson. London, 18671877. 8 vols.Google Scholar
Harle, J. C.. The art and architecture of the Indian subcontinent. Harmondsworth, 1986.Google Scholar
Hiralal, Rai Bahadur. ‘A visit to Ramtek’, Indian Antiquary, 37, 1908, 202–8.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. R. ‘Unknown pictographic script near Ramtek, C.P.’, Journal of the Bihar and Orissa Research Society, XX, 1934, 1012.Google Scholar
Huntington, Susan L. The art of ancient India. New York/Tokyo, 1985.Google Scholar
IAR = Indian archaeology 1975–1976—A review, ed. B. K., Thapar. New Delhi, 1979; Indian archaeology 1976–1977—A review, ed. B. K., Thapar. New Delhi, 1980; Indian archaeology 1979–1980—A review, ed. Debala, Mitra. New Delhi, 1983; Indian archaeology 1980–1981—A review, ed. Debala, Mitra. New Delhi, 1983; Indian archaeology 1981–1982—A review, ed. by Debala, Mitra. New Delhi, 1984; Indian archaeology 1982–1983—A review, ed. Nagaraja, Rao. New Delhi, 1985.Google Scholar
Jalhana, = The Sūktimuktāvalī of Bhagadatta Jalhana, ed. with an introduction in Sanskrit by Embar Krishnamacharya. (Gaekwad's Oriental Series, no. LXXXII.) Baroda, 1938.Google Scholar
Jamkhedkar, A. P. Narrative sculptures from Paunar: reappraisal, s.d.Google Scholar
1974Narrative sculptures from Markandi’, Journal of the Oriental Institute (of Baroda), xxm, 3, 1974, 202–8.Google Scholar
1985Buddhist bronzes from Ramtek’, Lalit Kalā, No. 22, 1985, 1319.Google Scholar
1987 ‘Vai๣ṇavism in the Vakataka times’ in: Vai๣ṇavism in Indian arts and culture, ed. R., Parimoo. New Delhi, 1987 (=1986): 335–41.Google Scholar
Kālidāsa, = Meghadūta, in: The complete works of Kālidāsa: the text in Sanskrit and Prakrit, ed. with an introduction by V. P., Joshi. Leiden, 1976.Google Scholar
Lienhart, Siegfried. A history of classical poetry Sanskrit-Pali-Prakrit. (A History of Indian Literature, Vol. III, fasc. 1.) Wiesbaden, 1984.Google Scholar
Med. Ind. Pal. = Medieval Indian palaeography. Nagri Western and Southern India, ed. Parmeshwari, Lai Gupta. (Medieval Indian Palaeography, II.) New Delhi, 1984.Google Scholar
Mirashi, Vasudev Vishnu. Meghadūta mẽ Rāmagiri arthāt Ramṭek. (Vidarbha Saṃṣodhana Maṇḅate, No. 12.) Nagpur, 1959.Google Scholar
Mirashi, Vasudev Vishnu. ‘Ramagiri of Kalidasa’, Journal of Indian History, XLII, 1, 1964, 131–43. [1964 (a)]Google Scholar
Mirashi, Vasudev Vishnu. ‘Trivikrama, the author of Madālasācampū’, Nagpur University Journal (Humanities), xv, 1, 1964, 17. [1964 (A)]Google Scholar
Nagpur Gaz. = Central Provinces District Gazeteers: Nagpur District. Vol. A, Descriptive. Ed. R. V., Russell. Bombay, 1908.Google Scholar
Pingree, David. Census of the exact sciences in Sanskrit. (Series A, Vols. 14. Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society Vol. 81, 86, 111, 146.) Philadelphia, 19701981.Google Scholar
Rām, . = The Vālmīki-Rāmāyaṃa. Crit. ed. for the first time by a board of editors. Baroda, 19601975. 7 vols.Google Scholar
Ṥārrigadeva, . = Saṃgītaratnākara. With Kalānidhi of Kallinātha and Sudhākara of Siṃhabhūpāla. Ed. Pt. S. S., Sastri. Vol. 1 (adhyāya 1). Madras, 1943.Google Scholar
SM = Sindūragirimāhdtmya, ed. S. M., Ayachit. Nagpur, 1985.Google Scholar
Sternbach, Ludwik. A descriptive catalogue of poets quoted in Sanskrit anthologies and inscriptions. Wiesbaden, 19781980. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Sthānapothī = Sthāna Pothī. Prastāvanā, Mūla Pothī, Sthānasücī, Kaṭhīṇa śabdāṃcā kośa, ilyadīsahita saṃpādilelā. [Ed.] Visnu, Bhikājī Kolte. Malkapur, 1976 (2nd ed.).Google Scholar
Swamikannu, Pillai and Dewan, Bahadur L. D. Indian chronology solar, lunar and planetary: a practical guide. The interpretation and verification oftithis, nakshatras horoscopes and other Indian time-records B.C. 1 to A.D. 2000. New Delhi, 1982.Google Scholar
Trivikrama = Madālasācampū, ed. Modak, and Sane, .Google Scholar
Trivikramabhaṭṭa Damayantīkathā or Nalacampū, with the Commentary Viśamapadaprakāśa by Caśdapāla. Ed. N. B., Parvanlkar, PtDurgaprasad, and PtSivadatta, . Bombay 1885 (Nirnaya Sagar Press) (2nd ed., 1903).Google Scholar
Verma, Onkar Prasad. A survey of Hemadpanti temples in Maharashtra. Nagpur, 1973.Google Scholar
Williams, Joanna. Vākāṭka art and the Gupta mainstream, in: Essays on Gupta culture, ed. Bardwell, L. Smith. Delhi, 1983: 215–33.Google Scholar
Yazdani, G.. (ed.) The early history of the Deccan. Oxford, 1960. 2 vols.Google Scholar