^{page 339 note 1} Ùber die altindische Gòttin Dhisaná, Upsala, 1919,Google Scholar

^{page 340 note 1} Solfa°geln i Indien, Upsala, 1910.Google Scholar

^{page 340 note 2} Die Supamasage, Upsala, 1920–1922 (cf. this Bulletin, ii, p. 807 sq.).Google Scholar

^{page 340 note 3} Cp. Hindu Gods and Heroes (1922), p. 37 sq.Google Scholar

^{page 342 note 1} In face of Professor Keith's assertion (p. 150) that Śiva representsan amalgamation of Rudra with “a vegetation deity, an Indian Dionysos” we might be allowed to ask where that vegetation deity is to be found. As Indian sources are absolutely silent about him, the inference perhaps is that the Dionysos of Megasthenes is alluded to. If that is the case, the evidence is totally insufficient.

^{page 343 note 1} Cp. JEAS., 1913, p. 155 sq.Google Scholar

^{page 343 note 2} Zeitschrift für Buddhismus, vol. vi (1924–1925), p. 48 sq.Google Scholar

^{page 344 note 1} PASB., 1921, p. xxi sq.Google Scholar

^{page 344 note 2} Denkschriften der Wiener Ahad. d. Wiss., 58, 3 (1914).Google Scholar

^{page 344 note 3} Kuhn's Zeitschrift, vol. 41, p. 314 sq.Google Scholar

^{page 344 note 4} Arkiv för Nordisk Fihlogi, vol. 35, p. 1 sq.Google Scholar

^{page 345 note 1} Armenische Studien, p. 89 sq.Google Scholar

^{page 345 note 2} Indogermanische Forschungen, vol. i, p. 479 sq.Google Scholar

^{page 345 note 3} Sitzungsberickte der Bayer. Akad. d. Wiss., 1917–1918.Google Scholar

^{page 345 note 4} Loc. cit., p. 108 sq.Google Scholar

^{page 345 note 5} VOJ., xxix, 172 sq.Google Scholar

^{page 345 note 6} Sitzungsberichte der Heidelbarger Akad. d. Wiss., 1910: 4, p. 7 sq.Google Scholar

^{page 345 note 7} Cp. expressions like ātmānam yuñjĩla, etc.