We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Private Governance: Creating Order in Economic and Social Life, by Edward P. Stringham. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 296 pp. ISBN: 978-0199365166
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
03 October 2017
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Bartley, T. 2007. Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: The rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. American Journal of Sociology, 113: 297–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingwerth, K. 2008. North-South parity in global governance: The affirmative procedures of the Forest Stewardship Council. Global Governance, 14: 53–71.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. 1988. The moral dimension: Toward a new economics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Fourcade, M., & Healy, K. 2007. Moral views of market society. Annual Review of Sociology, 33: 285–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, B. J. 2009. The failure of private ordering and the financial crisis of 2008. New York University Journal of Law & Business, 5: 549–616.Google Scholar
Short, J. L., & Toffel, M. W. 2010. Making self-regulation more than merely symbolic: The critical role of the legal environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(3): 361–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteman, G., & Cooper, W. H. 2016. Decoupling rape. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2(2): 115–154.Google Scholar
Yue, L. Q., Luo, J., & Ingram, P. 2013. The failure of private regulation: Elite control and market crises in the Manhattan banking industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58: 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar