Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T14:37:19.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breaking Even: Political Economy and Private Enterprise in the Norwegian Glass Industry, 1739–1803

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2019

Rolv Petter Amdam ,
Robert Fredona  and
Sophus A. Reinert
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using internal debates and surviving account books, this article traces the eighteenth-century history of the Norwegian glass industry, created to exploit Norway's immense natural resource wealth, and of the chartered company that would later become Norway's iconic Christiania Glasmagasin. The investors in the company, many of them among Norway's “founding fathers,” were individually responsible for its losses and it operated, remarkably, at an annual loss for nearly five decades. The article asks why, beyond the anticipation of a royal import ban on foreign glass, private investors might have continued to accept such losses. It focuses on tensions between cameralist and liberal ideologies in the creation of an important national industry, and on older (and perhaps more sustainable) ways of thinking about profitability.

Keywords

Norwayglass industryprofitabilitypolitical economycameralismliberalizationpatriotismnatural resources
Type
Research Article
Information
Business History Review , Volume 93 , Issue 2 , Summer 2019 , pp. 275 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article draws on and develops work by Rolv Petter Amdam originally published in his chapters in Rolv Petter Amdam, Tore Jørgen Hanisch, and Ingvild Pharo, Vel blåst! Christiania Glasmagasin og norsk glassindustri 1739–1989 (Oslo, 1989). Robert Fredona's research was supported by a grant from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 793583. The authors are grateful to Geoffrey Jones and three anonymous reviewers for suggestions and constructive critiques. We also thank cartographer Isabelle Lewis for expertly drawing the two maps and Mathew W. Norris, executive director of analytics at the Art Institute of Chicago, for designing the charts.

References

1 On the Norwegian glass industry, and Christiania Glasmagasin in particular, see Amdam, Hanisch, and Pharo, Vel blåst!; and Jens W. Berg, Kortfattet historie om glassproduksjonen i Norge (Jevnaker, 1992).

2 See, for example, the case of Statoil in Thurber, Mark C. and Istad, Benedicte Tangen, “Norway's Evolving Champion: Statoil and the Politics of State Enterprise,” in Oil and Governance: State-Owned Enterprises and the World Energy Supply, ed. Victor, David G., Hults, David R., and Thurber, Mark (Cambridge, UK, 2012), 601–2Google Scholar.

3 O'Sullivan, Mary, “The Intelligent Woman's Guide to Capitalism,” Enterprise and Society 19, no. 4 (2018): 751–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar, esp. 786–95.

4 This “privilege” is printed in G. E. Christiansen, De gamle privilegerte norske glassverker og Christiania Glasmagasin, 3 vols. (Oslo, 1939), 1:11–20.

5 The literature on these traditions is huge and growing. See, among others, Magnusson, Lars, The Political Economy of Mercantilism (London, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Minard, Philippe, La fortune du colbertisme: État et industrie dans la France des lumières (Paris, 1998)Google Scholar; Wakefield, Andre, The Disordered Police State: German Cameralism as Science and Practice (Chicago, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Reinert, Sophus A., “Rivalry: Greatness in Early Modern Political Economy,” in Mercantilism Reimagined: Political Economy in Early Modern Britain and its Empire, ed. Stern, Philip J. and Wennerlind, Carl (Oxford, 2013), 248–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On the translation of emulation of such theories and practices around the European world, see Reinert, Sophus A., Translating Empire: Emulation and the Origins of Political Economy (Cambridge, MA, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On the commercial world out of which this tradition emerged, see Robert Fredona and Sophus A. Reinert, “Merchants and the Origins of Capitalism,” in The Routledge Companion to the Makers of Global Business, ed. Teresa da Silva Lopes, Christina Lubinski, and Heidi J. S. Tworek (Abingdon, forthcoming).

6 Amdam, Hanisch, and Pharo, Vel blåst!, 10; Glamann, Kristof, “Et kameralistisk programskrift: Uforgribelige tanker om kommerciens tilstand of opkomst,” in Studier i dansk merkantilisme: Omkring tekster af Otto Thott, ed. Glamann, Kristof and Oxenbøll, Erik (Copenhagen, 1977), 11–77Google Scholar, esp. 24. On the war, see Ullgren, Peter, Det stora nordiska kriget 1700–1721: En berättelse om stormakten Sveriges fall (Stockholm, 2008)Google Scholar.

7 Forestilling No. 65, 4 July 1737, Kommersekollegiet, microfilm, National Archives, Oslo (hereafter KKf).

8 Otto Thott, “Allerunderdanigste uforgribelige tanker om commerciens telstand og opkomst [1735],” in Glamann and Oxenbøll, Studier, 184. On the role of nature in Norwegian political economy during the Enlightenment, see also Reinert, Sophus A., “Even Hammer: Politisk økonomi i den norske opplysningstiden,” in Årbok 2017 (Molde, 2017), 8–39Google Scholar.

9 Thott, “Uforgribelige tanker,” 171, 182, 185.

10 Thott, 189.

11 Thott, 192. On the fire, see Kåre Lauring, Byen brænder: Den store brand i København 1728 (Copenhagen, 2003).

12 Thott, “Uforgribelige tanker,” 192.

13 For the list of all shareholders, see Christiansen, De gamle privilegerte norske glassverker, 1:57–60.

14 The classic work on the subject remains Tveite, Stein, Engelsk-norsk trelasthandel 1640–1710 (Bergen, 1961)Google Scholar. For an example of the longevity of this trade in global context, see Bang, Anne K., Zanzibar-Olsen: Norsk trelasthandel i Øst-Afrika 1895–1925 (Oslo, 2008)Google Scholar.

15 On this “class,” see the essays in Collett, John Peter and Frydenlund, Bård, eds., Christianias handelspatrisiat: En elite i 1700-tallets Norge (Oslo, 2008)Google Scholar; and Telste, Kari, “Visittstuen som speilbilde av global handel? Handelspatrisiat, selskapsliv og forbruk i Christiania omkring 1760,” Heimen 46, no. 4 (2009): 317–28Google Scholar, 367. See also Erling Rimehaug, “Trelastpatrisiatet og den økonomiske politikk i merkantilismens siste periode: En undersøkelse av pengepolitikkens virkninger for norsk trelasteksport 1760–1806” (master's thesis, University of Oslo, 1975). For an analysis of the phenomenon in a later period, see Knut Sogner, with Christensen, Sverre A., Plankeadel: Kjær- og Solbergfamilien under den 2. industrielle revolusjon (Oslo, 2001)Google Scholar.

16 Christen Henriksen Pram, Tale paa Kongens Födselsdags-Höitid 1811 med oplysende Anmærkninger (Copenhagen, [1811?]), 37.

17 On the earlier history of limited liability companies, see Carmona, Maurice, “Aspects du capitalisme toscan aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles: Les sociétés en commandite à Florence et à Lucques,” Revue d'histoire moderne et contemporaine 11, no. 2 (1964): 81–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Christiansen, De gamle privilegerte norske glassverker, 1:51–54.

19 Christiansen, 1:11–20.

20 Reproduced in Amdam, Hanisch, and Pharo, Vel blåst!, 11.

21 Amdam, Hanisch, and Pharo, 11.

22 Caspar Herman von Storm to Morten Wærn, 19 Aug. 1760, Private archive no. 1, National Archives, Oslo (hereafter PA 1).

23 Amdam, Hanisch, and Pharo, Vel blåst!, 16.

24 In addition to Amdam, Hanisch, and Pharo, Vel blåst!, see Johansen, Lynn F., Glass på Hokksund før og nå ([Hokksund], 1998)Google Scholar; Polak, Ada, Gammelt norsk glass (Oslo, 1953)Google Scholar; and Gaustad, Randi, Skål for Norge! Nøstetangens spennende billedverden (Oslo, 1998)Google Scholar.

25 On the silver mines at Kongsberg, see Odd Arne Helleberg, Kongsberg sølvverk 1623–1958: Kongens øyensten—rikenes pryd (Kongsberg, 2000).

26 On the German experts who first were brought to Norway for these purposes, see Amdam, Hanisch, and Pharo, Vel blåst!, 10, and, on the industrial espionage, 18–19. On the Danish government's involvement in releasing the spy Morten Wærn from his London jail, see Storm to Adam Gottlob Moltke, 9 Aug. 1755, PA 1. More broadly, on foreign workers in the industry in Norway, see also Minken, Anne, Innvandrere ved norske glassverk og etterkommerne deres (1741–1865): En undersøkelse av etnisk identitet (Oslo, 2002)Google Scholar. On industrial espionage at the time, see Harris, J. R., Industrial Espionage and Technology Transfer: Britain and France in the Eighteenth Century (London, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; for the Norwegian case, see Amdam, Rolv Petter, “Industrial Espionage and the Transfer of Technology to the Early Norwegian Glass Industry,” in Technology Transfer and Scandinavian Industrialization, ed. Bruland, Kristine (New York, 1991), 73–94Google Scholar. On Venetian prohibitions, see Trivellato, Francesca, Fondamenta dei vetrai: Lavoro, tecnologia e mercato a Venezia tra Sei e Settecento (Rome, 2000), 37Google Scholar. On these dynamics of emulation, see also Reinert, Translating Empire; and Fusaro, Maria, Political Economies of Empire in the Early Modern Meditarranean: The Decline of Venice and the Rise of England, 1450–1700 (Cambridge, UK, 2015), 298CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The flow of technology went all ways, of course; for the example of Venice, see Berveglieri, Roberto, Inventori stranieri a Venezia, 1474–1788: Importazione di tecnologia e circolazione di tecnici artigiani inventori (Venice, 1995)Google Scholar.

27 Storm to Christensen, postmaster in Helsingør, 6 Oct. 1753, Copy book, PA 1.

28 Gaustad, Skål for Norge!, esp. 26–54. Books, of course, traveled as well, and Scandinavians were well aware of such classics of glassmaking as Antonio Neri's L’arte vetraia (Florence, 1612); see, for example, Samuel Schultze, Tal om glas-makeriet (Stockholm, 1762), 7–8.

29 Amdam, Hanisch, and Pharo, Vel blåst!, 13.

30 Based on calculations from the ledger 1751–1760, no. 3, PA 1.

31 Minutes, board of management, 19 June 1753, Moltke's archive, no. 21, private archive, National Archives, Copenhagen (hereafter Moltke's archive).

32 Storm to Wærn, 5 July 1754, Copy book, PA 1.

33 For an overview of the history of the city, see Synnøve Veinan Hellerud and Jan Messel, Oslo: A Thousand-Year History (Oslo, 2000).

34 Amdam, Hanisch, and Pharo, Vel blåst!, chap. 1.

35 For perspectives on this challenge in contemporary Europe, see Reinert, Sophus A., The Academy of Fisticuffs: Political Economy and Commercial Society in Enlightenment Italy (Cambridge, MA, 2018), 241–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 C. Anker to Koefoed, 20 June 1776, Copy book, PA 1.

37 Ledgers, 1751–60, 1767–73, no. 3, PA 1.

38 Ekaterina Khaustova and Paul Sharp, “A Note on Danish Living Standards through Historical Wage Series, 1731–1913” (EHES Working Papers in Economic History, No. 81, July 2015), 6.

39 Christiansen, De gamle privilegerte norske glassverker, 1:31, 60, 70.

40 “Convention of Foreining imellem de Herrer Particionater af the octrojerede norske Kompani,” in Christiansen, 1:35–41.

41 Calculated from the ledger 1767–1773, no. 3, PA 1.

42 Based on a systematic analysis of the Ledger 1767–1773, no. 3. On the Øresund dues, see Erik Gøbel, “Øresundstolden og dens regnskaber 1497–1857,” Årbog 2010 (Helsingør, 2010), 63.

43 Peter Friderich Suhm and Rasmus Nyerup, Nye Samlinger til den danske historie:vol. 2 (Copenhagen, 1793); Glamann and Oxenbøll, Studier, 86–88.

44 Calculated from the ledger 1767–1773, no. 3, PA. 1.

45 See, for example, Sverre Steen, Tidsrummet 1720 til omkring 1770, vol. 6, Det norske folks liv og historie gjennem tidene (Oslo, 1932), 190–196.

46 Ledger 1767–73, no. 3, PA 1.

47 For example, Christiansen, De gamle priviligerte norske glassverker, 1:150.

48 Storm, memo, 11 Mar. 1763, no. 21, Moltke's archive.

49 Christiansen, De gamle privilegerte norske glassverker, 1:519.

50 J. O. Bro-Jørgensen, Axel Nielsen, and Historie Selskabet for Udgivelse af Kilder til Dansk, Tiden 1730–1820, vol. 2 (Copenhagen, 1975), 118–19. Otto D. Lütken in particular argued strongly for the reduction of prices of industry products to encourage the demand. See Økonomisk Magazin, no. 2 (1758).

51 Storm mentioned that the custom tariffs should be 40 percent for white glass if Norwegian glass should manage to compete with imported glass. See Supplikk, 26 May 1755, Copy book, PA 1.

52 Storm to Moltke, Copy book, PA 1.

53 Morten Wærn Promemoria 15 July 1772, XXI, 12 Finansarkivene, National Archives, Oslo (hereafter FA).

54 Amdam, Hanisch, and Pharo, Vel blåst!, 35. For context on the early period of the welfare state, see Anne-Lise Seip, Sosialhjelpstaten blir til: Norsk sosialpolitikk 1740–1920 (Oslo, 1984), esp. 34–51.

55 Arnŏst Klima “Glassmaking Industry and Trade in Bohemia in the XVIIth and XVIIIth Centuries,” Journal of European Economic History 13, no. 3 (1984): 512–20.

56 Forestilling no. 991/1750–53, KKf.

57 Jørgensen, Hans-Jørgen, Det Norske Tollvesens historie: Fra middelalderen til 1814 (Oslo, 1969), 278Google Scholar.

58 Rasch, Aage, Dansk toldpolitik 1760–1797 (Aarhus, 1955), 513–20Google Scholar.

59 From a 1787 announcement from the Royal Academy of Science (Kgl. Norske Videnskabers Selskab), quoted in Monica Aase, “Patrioter og Bønder: Det Kongelige Norske Videnskabers Selskabs arbeid med landbrukspremier 1772–1806” (master's thesis, University of Trondheim, 1987) 119; see also Bagge, Sverre and Mykland, Knut, Norge i dansketiden (Copenhagen, 1987), 243–44Google Scholar.

60 On this process more broadly, see Hutchison, Ragnhild, In the Doorway to Development: An Enquiry into Market Oriented Structural Changes in Norway, ca. 1750–1830 (Leiden, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61 Several letters between Moltke and Storm 1756–1759, Copy book, PA 1.

62 Supplikk, 26 May 1755, PA 1.

63 On this concept in the historiography of political economy, see Coffman, D'Maris, Leonard, Adrian, and Neal, Larry, eds., Questioning Credible Commitment: Perspectives on the Rise of Financial Capitalism (Cambridge, UK, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64 Forestilling no. 43/1766, Generaltollkammeret, microfilm, National Archives, Oslo (hereafter GTKf).

65 Quoted in Storm to Brandt, 26 June 1757, Copy book, PA 1.

66 Storm to Wærn, 19 Oct. 1759, Copy book, PA 1.

67 Forestilling no. 43/1766, GTKf.

68 Forestilling no. 1/1762, 43/1766, GTKf.

69 Christiansen, De gamle privilegerte norske glassverker, 1:112–13; Rasch, Dansk toldpolitik, 91.

70 See, on this debate, Sophus A. Reinert, “State Capitalisms Past and Present: The European Origins of the Developmental State,” in The Oxford Handbook of State Capitalism, eds. Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra et al. (Oxford, 2019), forthcoming.

71 Storm to Wærn, 18 Apr. 1760, Copy book, PA 1.

72 Forestilling no. 42/1760–61, GTKf.

73 Storm to the king, 23 Mar. 1760, Copy book, PA 1. Christiansen, De gamle privilegerte norske glassverker, 1:100.

74 Modellbok for Nøstetangens og Aas' produkter med prisangivelse, 1763, see https://media.digitalarkivet.no/view/32611/1

75 Sixty-seven percent of the payments of 136,497 Rd from 1761 to 1771 were paid in 1769–1770.

76 Newton Wærn, memo, 30 June 1776, XXI, 11.1 FA.

77 Christiansen, De gamle privilegerte norske glassverker, 1:115.

78 Figure for 1769 based on the ledger 1767–1773, PA 1; 1776 figure based on, Christiansen, De gamle privilegerte norske glassverker, 1:272.

79 Amdam, Hanisch, and Pharo, Vel blåst!, 27.

80 Christiansen, De gamle privilegerte norske glassverker, 1:104, 109, 124, 128, 131.

81 Benzon voted on the behalf of the king, and he and Storm controlled the majority of the shares. Newton Wærn, memo, 30 June 1776, XXI, 11.1, FA.

82 Christiansen, De gamle privilegerte norske glassverker, 1:142.

83 Christiansen, 1:141.

84 Contract, XXI, 11.1, FA.

85 C. Anker to Overskattedir, 7 Sept. 1776, Copy book, PA 1.

86 Christiansen, De gamle privilegerte norske glassverker, 1:88.

87 Forestilling no. 193/1793, Finanskollegiet, National Archives, Copenhagen (hereafter FK).

88 Christiansen, De gamle privilegerte norske glassverker, 2:83–87

89 Bernt Anker, memo, 14 Apr. 1774, XXI, 11.1, FA.

90 C. Anker to Overskattedir, 7 Sept. 1776, Copy book, PA 1.

91 B. Anker, memo, 15 Apr. 1774, XXI, 11.1, FA.

92 Minutes, General Assembly 10 Dec 1774, XXI, 12. FA.

93 Christiansen, De gamle privilegerte norske glassverker, 1:148.

94 Minutes, General Assembly, 24 Apr. 1776, XXI, 11.1, FA.

95 C. Anker, memo, 11 May 1784, Schimmelmann's papers concerning Handelskompagniet, FK.

96 Generlauditør Fleicher on behalf of Mrs. Riis and Mrs.Wærn, minutes, General Assembly, 27 June and 12 Dec. 1774, XXI, 11.1, FA. On December 10, 1774, the general assembly decided that if Bernt Anker's bid was not accepted, the glassworks should be sold.

97 Ledger 1767–1773, part II, fol. 16, no 3, PA 1.

98 Ingrid Hagen, Blåfargen fra Modum: En verdenshistorie; Blaafarveværket 1776–1821 (Oslo, 2014), 7.

99 P. Simonsen, memo, 6 Apr. 1778, XXI, 11.2, FA.

100 Rawert, Ole Jørgen, Kongeriget Danmarks industrielle Forhold fra de ældste Tider indtil Begyndelsen af 1848 (Copenhagen, 1850), 339Google Scholar.

101 For an overview, see Bregnsbo, Michael and Jensen, Kurt Villads, Det danske imperium: Storhed og fald (Copenhagen, 2004)Google Scholar.

102 Amdam, Hanisch, and Pharo, Vel blåst!, fig. 1.3. On Norwegians in Trankebar (or Tranquebar), see Ustvedt, Yngvar, Trankebar: Nordmenn i de gamle tropekolonier (Oslo, 2001)Google Scholar. On the legacy of this colonial moment, see Jørgensen, Helle, “Heritage Tourism in Tranquebar: Colonial Nostalgia or Postcolonial Encounter?,” in Scandinavian Colonialism and the Rise of Modernity: Small Time Agents in a Global Arena, ed. Naum, Magdalena and Nordin, Jonas M. (Dordrecht, 2013), 69–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Jensen, Johan Skog, “Danmark-Norges etablering og tidlig ekspansjon i India,” Internasjonal Politikk 67, no. 1 (2009): 7–28Google Scholar.

103 Based on the ledger 1767–1773, PA 1.

104 C. Anker to Den Norske Fabrikdireksjon, 24 Aug. 1778, Copy book, Fabrikkdireksjonene, PA 1.

105 C. Anker, memo, 31 Jan. 1778; Den Norske Farbrikdireksjon to Calmeyer, 6 June 1778; both in Copy book, Fabrikkdireksjonene, PA 1.

106 C. Anker to P. Anker, 2 Sept. 1776, Copy book, Fabrikkdireksjonene, PA 1.

107 C. Anker, memo, 31 Jan. 1778; Den Norske Farbrikdireksjon to Calmeyer, 6 June 1778; both in Copy book, Fabrikkdireksjonene, PA 1.

108 Den Norske Fabrikdir. to Statsbalansedireksjonen, 7 July 1781, XXI, 11.2, FA.

109 H. Wexels statistics, Schimmelmann's papers, FK.

110 Christiansen, De gamle privilegerte norske glassverker, 3:265–315.

111 Smith, Adam, Undersøgelse om National-Velstands Natur og Aarsag, trans. and ed. Dræby, Frants, 2 vols. (Copenhagen, 1779–1780)Google Scholar. Interestingly, Dræby included a translation of Thomas Pownall's critique of Smith—his A Letter from Governor Pownall to Adam Smith (London, 1776)—in the second volume. On his decision to do so, see Dræby, introduction to Smith, Undersøgelse, 1:v–vi.

112 On the majority of subscribers being Norwegian, see Smith, Undersøgelse, 1:iii.

113 On Smith's personal relation with the Anker family as the context for the translation, see Banke, Niels, Om Adam Smiths forbindelse med Norge og Danmark (Copenhagen, 1955)Google Scholar, translated by Johansen, Hans as “On Adam Smith's Connections to Norway and Denmark,” in Adam Smith across Nations: Translations and Receptions of “The Wealth of Nations,” ed. Lai, Cheng-Chung (Oxford, 2000), 42–60Google Scholar. See also Risåsen, Geir Thomas, Eidsvollsbygningen: Carsten Anker og Grunnlovens hus (Oslo, 2005), 14–15Google Scholar.

114 Smith, quoted in Risåsen, Eidsvollsbygningen, 14. For the date, see Anker, Carl Johann, Christian Frederik og Carsten Ankers Brevveksling 1814 samt Uddrag af deres Breve fra 1801–13 og fra 1815–17, 2nd rev. ed. (Christiania, 1904), 666Google Scholar.

115 Hans Chr Johansen, Dansk økonomisk politik i årene efter 1784, vol. 1, Reformår, 1784–1788 (Aarhus, 1968), 217.

116 Christiansen, De gamle privilegerte norske glassverker, 1:253.

117 The losses from 1776 to 1784 were between 6,000 Rd and 9,000 Rd annually. Calculation based on Forestilling no. 83, 1785, FK.

118 From 1787 to 1791, the state received 9,546 Rd on average annually, minus 4,942 Rd that was paid as export and production premium. Net profit was 4,602 Rd annually. Forestilling no. 137 and 193/1792, FK.

119 Forestilling no. 137/1792, FK.

120 Forestilling no. 83/1787, FK; see also Johansen, Dansk økonomisk politik, 254–259

121 Forestilling no. 106/1785, FK.

122 Christiansen, De gamle privilegerte norske glassverker, 1:187–88.

123 M. Wærn, memo, 15 July 1772, XXI, 12, FA.

124 “Octroj for handels- and kanalkompaniet,” no. 15, in Christiansen, De gamle priveligerte norske glassverker, 1:176.

125 Delib. Protocol 1782–84, no. 364, Handels- og Kanalkompaniets archive, National Archives, Copenhagen (hereafter HK).

126 Forestilling no. 83/1787, FK.

127 Forestilling no. 83/1787, FK.

128 Forestilling no. 83/1787, FK.

129 Storm to the king, 3 May 1760, Copy book, PA 1.

130 Barkley, Andreas Johann, Monopoliers skadelige Følger bevist ved Glas-Magazinets Omgang med Glasmester-Lauget I Kiøbenhavn (Copenhagen, 1788), 41Google Scholar.

131 Delib. Protocol 1782–84/ no. 237, HK.

132 Forestilling no. 83/1787, FK.

133 Rasch, Dansk toldpolitik, 208–9; Johansen, Dansk økonomisk politik, 188–89, 259.

134 Forestilling no. 83/1787, FK.

135 Forestilling no. 137/1792 and no. 60/1793, FK.

136 Amdam, Hanish and Pharo, Vel blåst!, 44–47.

137 Forestilling no. 162/1793, FK.

138 Bro-Jørgensen, Nielsen, and Selskabet for Udgivelse af Kilder til Dansk, Tiden 1730–1820, 2, 146–149. On such Fabian measures as the theoretical and practical mainstream of Enlightenment political economy, see Reinert, Translating Empire, 281–88. For a long-term perspective of the underlying mechanisms, and the dynamic and protean nature of such interventions, see Wade, Robert, “The Developmental State: Dead or Alive?,” Development and Change 49, no. 2 (2018): 518–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

139 “Bemærkning ved en forhehavende muelig Forandring i det nuværende Fabriksystem 1794,” Div. No 889, Kommercekollegiet's archive, National Archives, Copenhagen (hereafter KK).

140 Smith, Adam, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, ed. Cannan, Edwin, 2 vols. (Chicago, 1976), 1:144Google Scholar.

141 Smith, Undersøgelse, 1:183.

142 Promemoria to Department of the Treasury, 11 Oct. 1802, XXIX, 12. FA. The “myth” that England was somehow less interventionist than other countries continues to haunt both academic and public opinion, but see, among others, Brewer, John, The Sinews of Power: War, Money and the English State, 1688–1783 (Cambridge, MA, 1990)Google Scholar; Vries, Peer, State, Economy and the Great Divergence: Great Britain and China, 1680s–1850s (New York, 2015)Google Scholar; Nye, John Vincent, “The Myth of Free-Trade Britain and Fortress France: Tariffs and Trade in the Nineteenth Century,” Journal of Economic History 51, no. 1 (1991): 23–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Reinert, Translating Empire, 269.

143 Playfair, William, The Commercial and Political Atlas (London, 1787), 86–88Google Scholar.

144 Stortingsforhandlinger 1821, vol. 3, no. 4, 21 July 1821 (Christiania, 1822), 76.

145 Anker's reliance on Smith may have been even more explicit. See Amdam, Hanisch, and Pharo, Vel blåst!, 54, drawing on Einar Mæhlum, “Statens glassverker under Carsten Ankers overbestyrelse 1819–1824” (master's thesis, University of Oslo, 1936), 36.

146 Stortingsforhandlinger 1821, 77–78.

147 Norsk biografisk leksikon, s.v. “Carsten Anker,” by Knut Mykland, https://nbl.snl.no/Carsten_Anker.

148 On this transition more broadly, see de Vries, Jan, The Industrious Revolution: Consumer Behavior and the Household Economy, 1650 to the Present (Cambridge, UK, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; on this era in Norwegian history, see Hutchison, Doorway to Development; on the granularity of commercial society at the time through a different lens, see Reinert, Academy of Fisticuffs, 11–15.

149 Reinert, Translating Empire, 283, 287.

150 For a similar perspective, see Harcourt, Bernard E., The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order (Cambridge, MA, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

151 On this concept and its consequences, see, for example, Lazonick, William, “Profits without Prosperity,” Harvard Business Review 92, no. 9 (2014): 46–55Google Scholar.

152 Mamelund, Svenn-Erik, “Mortality and Life Expectancy in Rendalen and Norway 1770–1900: Period and Cohort Perspectives,” in Nordic Demography in History and Present-Day Society, ed. Tedebrand, Lars-Göran and Sköld, Peter (Umeå, 2001), 215Google Scholar.

153 Thestrup, Poul, Mark og skilling, kroner og øre: Pengeenheder, priser og lønninger i Danmark i 350 år (1640–1989) (Helsingør, 1991), 30Google Scholar.

154 Store Norske Leksikon, s.v. “Ankerske Fideikommiss,” https://snl.no/Ankerske_Fideikommiss.

155 The literature on this is immense. Examples include Slack, Paul, From Reformation to Improvement: Public Welfare in Early Modern England (Oxford, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Reinert, Translating Empire, 101–3. For a meditation on what sort of “legal persons” corporations have become, see Bakan, Joel, The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power (New York, 2004)Google Scholar.

156 Jones, Geoffrey, Profits and Sustainability: A History of Green Entrepreneurship (Oxford, 2017), 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

157 Bourdieu, Pierre, “Social Space and Symbolic Power,” Sociological Theory 7, no. 1 (1989): 22CrossRefGoogle Scholar, discussing Nelson Goodman, Ways of Worldmaking (Indianapolis, 1978).

158 On how “an idea about the way the world is organized can be so widely shared that it sinks into the semiconscious space of common sense,” see Kennedy, David, A World of Struggle: How Power, Law, and Expertise Shape Global Political Economy (Princeton, 2016), 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On the dilemmas of common sense, see Rosenfeld, Sophia, Common Sense: A Political History (Cambridge, MA, 2011), 256–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

159 On Antonio Genovesi's argument regarding manufactures and colonialism in Naples, see Genovesi, Storia del commercio della Gran Brettagna, 3 vols. (Naples, 1757–1758), 1:lxxxv–lxxxvi, 35n–36n, 220n–221n, 367, discussed in Reinert, Translating Empire, 24–25. For the same argument in relation to Norway, see, for example, Hammer, Even, Philonorvagi: Velmente Tanker, til veltænkende Medborgere (Copenhagen, 1771)Google Scholar, 93, 100. On kingdoms governed as colonies or provinces at the time, see Robertson, John, The Case for the Enlightenment: Scotland and Naples, 1680–1760 (Cambridge, UK, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On patriotism and economic activity at the time, see Shovlin, John, The Political Economy of Virtue: Luxury, Patriotism, and the Origins of the French Revolution (Ithaca, 2006), esp. 129–32Google Scholar.

160 Storsveen, Odd Arvid, Norsk patriotisme før 1814 (Oslo, 1997)Google Scholar; Reinert, “Even Hammer”; Krefting, Ellen M., Nøding, Aina, and Ringvej, Mona R., Eighteenth-Century Periodicals as Agents of Change: Perspectives on Northern Enlightenment (Leiden, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

161 For a similar discussion, see Harvey, Charles, Maclean, Mairi, Gordon, Jillian, and Shaw, Eleanor, “Andrew Carnegie and the Foundations of Contemporary Entrepreneurial Philanthropy,” Business History 53, no. 3 (2011): 429CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

162 On the university, see Collet, John Peter, “Christianiapatrisiatet og nasjonen: Aksjonen for et norsk universitet i 1790-årene,” in Christianias handelspatrisiat: En elite i 1700-tallets Norge, ed. Collett, John Peter and Frydenlund, Bård (Oslo, 2008), 120–45Google Scholar. On the mantra of building the country, see the long arc from Gerhard Schøning, Norges Riiges Historie, 3 vols. (Sorø and Copenhagen, 1771–1781), 2:463, to Bjørn Enes, Kven skal bygge landet? (Oslo, 2014).

163 See Ringvej, Mona, Christian Frederiks tapte rike (Bergen, 2016), 20Google Scholar. On Norwegian patriotism before independence, see Lunden, Kåre, Norsk grålysning: Norsk nasjonalisme 1770–1814 (Oslo, 1992)Google Scholar; and Storsveen, Norsk patriotisme.

164 Reinert, Translating Empire, 282, 286. On the foundational tension between states and markets, see Hont, Istvan, Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective (Cambridge, MA, 2005), 155Google Scholar; and Reinert, Academy of Fisticuffs, 414–15n17.

165 This has already been noted eloquently by Drucker, Peter, “A Crisis of Capitalism: Who's in Charge? [1986],” in Managing for the Future (London, 2011), 237Google Scholar. The problem of short-termism resulting from “shareholder value thinking” has generated a cottage industry in recent years, but see, for example, Stout, Lynn, The Shareholder Value Myth: How Putting Shareholders First Harms Investors, Corporations, and the Public (San Francisco, 2012)Google Scholar, esp. 2.