Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T14:51:33.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of language in Greek ethnicities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Jonathan M. Hall
Jonathan M. Hall
Affiliation:
Downing College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The subject of ethnic identity in antiquity has a long-established – if somewhat dubious – pedigree. From as early as the end of the eighteenth century, scholars such as Friedrich von Schlegel were applying themselves to the art, customs and political forms which were thought to characterise Greek Stämme such as the Dorians, Ionians, Aeolians and Athenians. It was the nineteenth century, however, which witnessed a more systematic treatment of ancient ethnicity, as scholarly intuitions were subjected to the rigorous interrogation that was demanded by the newly-established discipline of Altertumswissenschaft. Typical of the new breed of professional scholars was Karl Otfried Müller, who devoted himself to analysing the Volksgeist of groups such as the Etruscans, the Minyans and – most famously – the Dorians.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society (Second Series) , Volume 41 , 1996 , pp. 83 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Rawson, E., The Spartan tradition in European thought (1991) 318–20Google Scholar.

2. For an account of the contextual influences on Müller: Wittenburg, A., ‘I Dori di K. O. Müller’, Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa 14 (1984) 1031–44Google Scholar.

3. Müller, K. O., Die Dorier ed. 2 (1844) viiGoogle Scholar.

4. Gellner, E., Culture, identity and politics (1987) 87Google Scholar.

5. See generally Banton, M., The idea of race (1977)Google Scholar; Banton, , Racial theories (1987)Google Scholar.

6. Rawson (n. 1) 342; Schnapp-Gourbeillon, A., ‘L'invasion dorienne a-t-elle eu lieu?’, in Mossé, C. ed., La Grèce ancienne (1986) 46Google Scholar.

7. Will, E., Doriens et Ioniens: essai sur la valeur du critère ethnique appliqué à l'étude de l'histoire et de la civilisation grecques (1956)Google Scholar. Will's belief in an ‘objective ethnicity’ appears on p. 53. For a critique: Alty, J., ‘Dorians and Ionians’, JHS 102 (1982) 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8. Starr, C. G., The origins of Greek civilization, 1100–650 BC (1962) 72Google Scholar.

9. Murray, O., Early Greece ed. 2 (1993) 9Google Scholar. Cf. Sakellariou, M. B., The polis-state: definition and origin (1989) 304Google Scholar: ‘The ethnic names, Dorians, Ionians etc., continued to be used by the peoples in question to indicate their remote origins and the broader group to which they belonged, their awareness of this deriving not only from traditions, but also from survivals of cults, customs and structures and above all, of dialect [my italics].’

10. Schermerhorn, R., ‘Ethnicity in the perspective of the sociology of knowledge’. Ethnicity 1 (1974) 1–14, esp. 3–4Google Scholar; Horowitz, D., Ethnic groups in conflict (1985) 13Google Scholar; Smith, A. D., The ethnic origins of nations (1986) 9Google Scholar.

11. For criticisms of instrumentalism: Parsons, T., ‘Some theoretical considerations on the nature and trends of change of ethnicity’, in Glazer, N. and Moynihan, D. eds., Ethnicity: theory and experience (1975) 53–83, esp. 63–4Google Scholar; Greene, V., ‘Old ethnic stereotypes and present-day white ethnics’, Ethnicity 5 (1978) 328–50, esp. 330–1Google Scholar; Tambiah, S. J., ‘Ethnic conflict in the world today’, American Ethnologist 16 (1989) 335–49, esp. 335CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12. Hall, J.M., ‘Approaches to ethnicity in the Early Iron Age of Greece’, in Spencer, N. ed., Time, tradition and society in Greek archaeology: bridging the ‘Great Divide’ (1995) 6–17, esp. 8–9Google Scholar. A more detailed analysis, together with bibliography, appears in Hall, , ‘Ethnic identity in the Argolid, 900–600 BC’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge (1993) chapter 2Google Scholar.

13. Taylor, D., Bassili, J. and Aboud, F., ‘Dimensions of ethnic identity: an example from Québec’, Journal of Social Psychology 89 (1973) 185–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Giles, H., Bourhis, R. and Taylor, D., ‘Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations’, in Giles, H. ed., Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations (1977) 307–48Google Scholar.

14. Soviet Jews: Haarmann, H., Language in ethnicity: a view of basic ecological relations (1986) 45CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Northern Ireland: Trudgill, P., Dialects in contact (1986) 122Google Scholar. For the fluctuating salience of language within Albanian ethnicity, see Saville-Troike, M., The ethnography of communication: an introduction ed. 2 (1989) 122Google Scholar.

15. Gupta, J. Das, ‘Ethnicity, language demands and national development in India’, in Glazer, and Moynihan, (n. 11) 466–88, esp. 471Google Scholar; Horowitz (n. 10) 68–9.

16. I owe this observation to Keith Brown.

17. For the distinction between ethnic criteria and indicia: Horowitz, D., ‘Ethnic identity’, in Glazer, and Moynihan, (n. 11) 111–40, esp. 119–20Google Scholar. For a general discussion: Hall, J. M., ‘Discourse and praxis: the detection and construction of ethnicity in the archaeological record’, in Herbert, S. and Potter, D. eds., Culture and ethnicity in the Hellenistic East: issues, problems and approaches (forthcoming)Google Scholar.

18. Moerman, M., ‘Who are the Lue? Ethnic identification in a complex civilization’, American Anthropologist 67 (1965) 1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar; cited in Eriksen, T. H., Ethnicity and nationalism: anthropological perspectives (1993) 11Google Scholar.

19. Bartonĕk, A., Classification of the West Greek dialects at the time about 350 BC (1972) 220–1Google Scholar. The seven divisions are: (i) the dialects of North-west Greece; (ii) the Saronic dialects (Megarian, Corinthian, East Argolic); (iii) West Argolic; (iv) the East Aegean dialects (Rhodian, Coan); (v) the Cretan dialects; (vi) Laconian, Messenian and Achaean; and (vii) Elean.

20. Kretschmer, P., ‘Zur Geschichte der griechischen Dialekte’, Glotta 1 (1909) 1–59Google Scholar.

21. The proposition of a single migratory wave was first put forward by Beloch, K. J., Griechische Geschichte I.1 (1924) 71Google Scholar; see also Bartonĕk, A., ‘L'evoluzione dei dialetti greci nella dimensione geografica delle età oscure’, in Musti, D. et al. eds., La transizione dal miceneo all'alto arcaismo: dalpalazzo alla città (1991) 241–50, esp. 242Google Scholar. For the view that the dialect groups had separated before the end of the second millennium B.C.: Palmer, L. R., The Greek language (1980) 74–7Google Scholar; Hainsworth, J. B., ‘The Greek language and the historical dialects’, CAH III.1, ed. 2 (1982) 850–65Google Scholar.

22. Risch, E., ‘La posizione del dialetto dorico’, in Musti, D. ed., Le origini dei Greci: Dori e mondo egeo (1986) 13–35Google Scholar; Risch, , ‘La contribution de la langue mycénienne au problème de la transition du palais à la cité’, in Musti, et al. (n. 21) 231–40Google Scholar.

23. First developed by Schleicher, A., Die Darwinsche Theorie und die Sprachwissenschaft (1863)Google Scholar. See Renfrew, C., Archaeology and language: the puzzle of Indo-European origins (1987) 102Google Scholar.

24. For Wellentheorie: Schmidt, J., Die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen (1872)Google Scholar; Wyatt, W. F., ‘The prehistory of the Greek dialects’, TAPA 101 (1970) 557–632Google Scholar; Renfrew (n. 23) 108–9.

25. Eire, A. López, ‘El retorno de los Heraclidas’, Zephyrus 28–9 (1978) 287–97Google Scholar; Alvarez, M. P. Fernández, El Argólico occidental y oriental en las inscripciones de los siglos VII, VI y V a. C. (1981) 11, 39Google Scholar.

26. Coleman, R., ‘The dialect geography of ancient Greece’, Transactions of the Philological Society 61 (1963) 58–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27. Duhoux, Y., Introduction aux dialectes grecs anciens: problèmes et méthodes, recueil de textes traduits (1983) 14Google Scholar; Davies, A. Morpurgo, ‘The Greek notion of dialect’, Verbum 10 (1987) 2–28, esp. 10Google Scholar.

28. Eriksen (n. 18) 65.

29. Collinge, N. E., ‘The dialectology and prehistoric development of Greek’, in Crossland, R. A. and Birchall, A. eds., Bronze Age migrations in the Aegean: archaeological and linguistic problems in Greek prehistory (1973) 293–304, esp. 295Google Scholar.

30. Hainsworth, J. B., ‘Greek views of Greek dialectology’, Transactions of the Philological Society 65 (1967) 62–76, esp. 64–5Google Scholar.

31. Bartonĕk (n. 19) 193; Collinge (n. 29) 295.

32. Risch (n. 22) 20.

33. Buck, C. D., The Greek dialects rev. ed. (1955) 14–15Google Scholar; Hainsworth (n. 30) 73–4; Bartonĕk (n. 19) 6; Cassio, A., ‘Il “carattere” dei dialetti greci e l'opposizione Ioni–Dori: testimonianze antiche e teorie di età romantica’, AION (Sezione Linguistica) 6 (1984) 113–36, esp. 118Google Scholar.

34. See IG 4.750; IG 7.336; SEG 16.666.

35. Jeffery, L. H., The local scripts of Archaic Greece: a study of the origin of the Greek alphabet and its development from the eighth to the fifth centuries BC rev. ed. (1990) 353Google Scholar; Craik, E., The Dorian Aegean (1980) 57Google Scholar.

36. Hainsworth (n. 30) 66; Cassio (n. 33) 115; Morpurgo Davies (n. 27) 13.

37. The unilineal relationship between language and ethnicity is stressed by Haarmann (n. 14), though it appears to have been misunderstood in Hall, E., Inventing the barbarian: Greek self-definition through tragedy (1989) 5 n. 10Google Scholar.

38. See generally Brixhe, C., ‘La langue comme reflet de l'histoire, ou les éléments non doriens du dialecte crétois’, in Brixhe, ed., Sur la Crète antique: histoire, écritures, langues (1991) 43–77, esp. 54–8Google Scholar.

39. Stoddart, S. and Whitley, J., ‘The social context of literacy in Archaic Greece and Etruria’, Antiquity 62 (1988) 761–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40. Brixhe (n. 38) 55.

41. See Beard, W. M., ‘Writing and ritual: a study of diversity and expansion’, PBSR 53 (1985) 114–62, esp. 139–41Google Scholar.

42. E.g. Bartonĕk, A., ‘The place of the Dorians in the Late Helladic world’, in Crossland, and Birchall, (n. 29) 305–11, esp. 308–9Google Scholar; Palmer (n. 21) 71.

43. See Ahrens, H., De graecae linguae dialectis II (1843)Google Scholar. However, Ruijgh, C. J., ‘Review of M. P. Fernández Alvarez, El Argolico occidental y oriental’, Mnemosyne 39 (1986) 455Google Scholar argues that all the Doric dialects originally created long ‘closed’ vowels as a result of the compensatory lengthenings of the late second / early first millennium, but that from 700 B.C. onwards, the ‘Severe Doric’ dialects underwent an innovatory shift to long ‘open’ vowels.

44. Bartonĕk (n. 19) 186.

45. Bartonĕk (n. 19) 201.

46. Bartonĕk (n. 19) 159, 185.

47. Bartonĕk (n. 19) 91.

48. See e.g. Hall, J. M., ‘How Argive was the “Argive” Heraion? The political and cultic geography of the Argive plain, 900–400 BC’ AJA 99 (1995) 577–613, esp. 584CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49. Müller, K. O., The history and antiquity of the Doric race I (1830) 12Google Scholar; West, M. L., The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: its nature, structure and origins (1985) 53Google Scholar; E. Hall (n. 37) 7.

50. Pylos: Mimnermos of Kolophon fr. 9 West; see further Nilsson, M. P., The Mycenaean origin of Greek mythology ed. 2 (1972) 153–4Google Scholar; Vanschoonwinkel, J., L'Égée et la Méditerranée orientate à la fin du IIe millénaire: témoignages archéologiques et sources écrites (1991) 378–80Google Scholar. North Peloponnese: Hdt. 1.145; 7.94; Strab. 8.1.2; 8.7.1–4; Paus. 7.1.2–4. Boeotia: Hellanicus of Mytilene FGrH 4 fr. 101; cf. Hdt. 1.146.1–2.

51. Hdt. 8.44.2. See further Connor, W. R., ‘The Ionian era of Athenian civic identity’, Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 137 (1993) 194–206, esp. 198–9Google Scholar.

52. Boardman, J., ‘Herakles, Peisistratos and the Unconvinced’, JHS 109 (1989) 158–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53. Hdt. 2.178.2–3. For a synopsis of the archaeology of Naucratis, see Boardman, J., The Greeks overseas ed. 2 (1980) 118–29Google Scholar.

54. E. Hall (n. 37).

55. Thuc. 1.130; 1.132.2.

56. Barth, F., ‘Introduction’, in Barth, ed., Ethnic groups and boundaries: the social organization of culture difference (1969) 9–38Google Scholar; Cohen, A. P., The symbolic construction of community (1985) 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

57. Hartog, F., The mirror of Herodotus: the representation of the other in the writing of history (1988)Google Scholar.

58. E. Hall (n. 37) 4.

59. Anderson, B., Imagined communities: reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism ed. 2 (1991) esp. 36Google Scholar.

60. Hobsbawm, E., Nations and nationalism since 1780: programme, myth, reality ed. 2 (1992) esp. 54Google Scholar.

61. Hobsbawm (n. 60) 106.

62. Morpurgo Davies (n. 27) 9, 14.

63. Pisani, V., ‘Die Entzifferung der ägäische linear B Schrift und die griechischen Dialekte’, Rh.M 98 (1955) 1–18Google Scholar.

64. Morpurgo Davies (n. 27) 17–18.

65. Chambers, J. and Trudgill, P., Dialectology (1980) 4Google Scholar.

66. Morpurgo Davies (n. 27) 8–9.

67. Chambers and Trudgill (n. 65) 6.

68. Hainsworth (n. 21) 865.

69. See Morpurgo Davies (n. 27) 15.

70. Finley, M. I., The use and abuse of history ed. 2 (1986) 120–33, esp. 121–2Google Scholar.

71. Gellner, E., Nations and nationalism (1983) 1Google Scholar.

72. For autochthony: Montanari, E., Il mito dell' autoctonia: linee di una dinamica mitico-politica ateniese ed. 2 (1981)Google Scholar; Rosivach, V. J., ‘Autochthony and the Athenians’, CQ 37 (1987) 294–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Loraux, N., The children of Athena: Athenian ideas about citizenship and the division between the sexes (1993)Google Scholar.