^{page 437 note 1} (1933) 5 C.L.J. 105; a note on Hall v. Brooklands Auto Racing Club [1933] 1 K.B. 205.

^{page 437 note 2} See p. 243 above.

^{page 437 note 3} The Independent, 17 April 1997.

^{page 437 note 4} Even within that narrow compass readers might expect to find an appreciation of his work as a law teacher. Such an appreciation, by Peter Glazebrook who succeeded him as Director of Studies at Jesus College, will appear in the S.P. T.L.Reporter.

^{page 440 note 1} Joint Torts and Contributory Negligence (London 1951), p.v.Google Scholar

^{page 440 note 2} Civil Liability Act (1961, No. 44), and see Dail Eireann, Debates, vol. 188, cols. 1588, 1592 et seq.

^{page 440 note 3} “Duties of Non-occupiers in respect of Dangerous Premises” (1942) 5 M.L.R. 194.

^{page 440 note 4} See generally, Reform of the Law (London 1951)Google Scholar, chap. V, and “Some Reforms of the Law of Tort” (1961) 24 M.L.R. 101.

^{page 440 note 5} “Liability for Independent Contractors” [1956] C.L.J. 180.

^{page 440 note 6} “The Effect of Penal Legislation in the Law of Tort” (1960) 23 M.L.R. 233.

^{page 440 note 7} See esp. “The Aims of the Law of Tort” (1951) 4 C.L.P. 137.

^{page 441 note 8} (1961)24 M.L.R. atp.101.

^{page 441 note 9} “A Strange Offspring of Trespass Ab Initio” (1936) 52 L.Q.R. 106.

^{page 441 note 10} “The Risk Principle” (1961) 77 L.Q.R.179, and “Causation in the Law” [1961] C.L.J. 62.

^{page 442 note 11} (1939) 55 L.Q.R 588 at p. 591.

^{page 442 note 12} (1939) 17 Can B.R. 613 at p. 615.

^{page 442 note 13} Liability for Animals (London, 1939) p. 2.Google Scholar

^{page 442 note 14} Op. cit., p. 363.

^{page 442 note 15} Foundations of the Law of Tort, 2nd ed., pp. 123–127.Google Scholar

^{page 442 note 16} See generally, Hepple, B., “Negligence: the Search for Coherence” (1997) 50 CLP. 69.Google Scholar

^{page 443 note 17} (1950) 13M.L.R. 400.

^{page 443 note 18} (1950) 66 L.Q.R. 253.

^{page 443 note 19} Report on Contribution. 1977, Law Com. No. 79.

^{page 443 note 20} See Chitty on Contracts, 27th ed., chap. 17 which refers extensively to Glanville Williams' book.

^{page 443 note 21} (1951) 66 L.Q.R. 528.

^{page 443 note 22} Fleming, , The Law of Torts, 8th ed., p. 55nGoogle Scholar, still refers to it as “the leading treatise”.

^{page 444 note 23} 1994, Law Com. No. 219.

^{page 444 note 24} (1939–41) 7C.L.J. 111.

^{page 444 note 25} Marc Rich & Co. AG v. Bishop Rock Marine Co. Ltd (The Nicholas H) [1996] 2 A.C. 211 at p. 236.Google Scholar

^{page 444 note 26} (1951)4C.L.P. 137.

^{page 445 note 27} Cardozo, B., The Nature of the Judicial Process (New York 1921) 166–167).Google Scholar

^{page 445 note 1} Williams, G.L.Criminal Law: The General Part (London 1953) p. 435;Google Scholar cf. also p. 130. All further page references are, unless otherwise indicated, to this (first) edition.

^{page 446 note 2} pp. 567–587; “The Defence of Necessity” (1953) 6 C.L.P. 216; Sanctity of Life pp. 286–287; “A Commentary on R v. Dudley and Stephens” [1977] Cambrian L.R. 94; “Necessity” [1978] Crim. L.R. 128.

^{page 446 note 3} E.g., pp. 28, 54, 65–66, 77, 108, 230, 242.

^{page 446 note 4} p. 463.

^{page 446 note 5} p. 458.

^{page 446 note 6} p. 125; “Statute Interpretation, Prostitution and the Rule of Law”, in Tapper, C.F.H. (ed.) Crime, Proof and Punishment (London 1981) 71.Google Scholar

^{page 446 note 7} p. 90.

^{page 447 note 8} p. 109.

^{page 447 note 9} “ ‘Rape is Rape’“ [1992] N.L.J. 11.

^{page 447 note 10} [1993] 1 All E.R. 42.

^{page 447 note 11} E.g., pp. 3–7, 477; “What Should the Code do about Omissions?” (1987) 7 L.S. 92; “Letting Offences Happen” [1990] Crim, L.R. 780; “Criminal Omissions—the Conventional View” (1991)Google Scholar 107 L.Q.R. 86.

^{page 447 note 12} “Conspiring to Corrupt”, in Megarry, R.E. (ed.) Law in Action (1965) 71Google Scholar, 76; “Law and Fact” [1976] Crim. L.R. 472, 532; “The Standard of Honesty” [1983] N.L.J. 636.

^{page 447 note 13} “Blackmail” [1954] Crim. L.R. 79.

^{page 448 note 14} pp. 15–16, 19.

^{page 448 note 15} pp. 21, 59, 138.

^{page 448 note 16} pp. 49–51,77–81.

^{page 448 note 17} pp. 29, 87–88; The Mental Element in Crime (Jerusalem 1965) (hereafter M.E.C.) p. 59.

^{page 448 note 18} pp. 35–39; Sanctity of Life, p. 286; M.E.C. pp. 15, 24; and “Oblique Intention” [1987] C.L.J. 417.

^{page 448 note 19} pp. 59–62; M.E.C. pp. 27, 29, 32 and “Intention and Recklessness Again” (1982) 2 L.S. 189.

^{page 448 note 20} pp. 77–81, 355, 691–719.

^{page 448 note 21} pp. 173–174, 719 and “Offences and Defences” (1982) 2 L.S. 189.

^{page 448 note 22} p. 159.

^{page 449 note 23} Chap. 7, passim.

^{page 449 note 24} p. 486; “A Fresh Start with the Law of Attempt” [1980] C.L.J. 225; “The Government's Proposals on Criminal Attempts” [1981] N.L.J. 80, 104, 128.

^{page 449 note 25} pp. 487–503; “Criminal Attempts—A Reply” [1962] Crim. L.R. 300; “Attempting the Impossible— A Reply” (1980) 22 Crim. L.Q. 49.

^{page 449 note 26} p. 183.

^{page 449 note 27} p. 25.

^{page 449 note 28} Lord Denning: Responsibility Before The Law (Jerusalem 1961) passim; Lord Diplock: Gould [1968] 2 Q.B. 65; Sweet v. Parsley [1970] A.C. 132, 163; Hyam [1975] A.C. 55; Caldwell [1982] A.C. 341.

^{page 449 note 29} M.E.C., preface.

^{page 450 note 30} Touched upon at p. 74 (“cruelly”).

^{page 450 note 31} p. 418.

^{page 450 note 32} “The Mens Rea for Murder: Leave It Alone” (1989) 105 L.Q.R. 387.

^{page 450 note 33} Majewski [1977] A.C. 443; Moloney [1985] A.C. 905; Hancock [1986] A.C. 455.

^{page 450 note 34} Westminster City Council v. Croyalgrange Ltd. [1986] 1 W.L.R. 674.

^{page 450 note 35} Majewski [1911] A.C. 443.

^{page 450 note 36} pp. 369, 377, 379, 381.

^{page 450 note 37} O'Connor (1980) 146 C.L.R. 64.

^{page 450 note 38} p. 451.

^{page 450 note 39} [1962] A.C. 220.

^{page 451 note 40} “Conspiring to Corrupt”, in Megarry, R.E. (ed.) Law in Action (1965) p. 71.Google Scholar

^{page 451 note 41} pp. 230–235.

^{page 451 note 42} pp. 383–433.

^{page 451 note 43} pp. 154–202.

^{page 451 note 44} pp. 299–301, 364.

^{page 451 note 45} The Reform of the Law, p. 19; pp. 441–445; M.E.C. pp. 120–121.

^{page 451 note 46} The Reform of the Law, p. 13.

^{page 451 note 47} The Times, 10 June 1952; “Reform of the Criminal Law and its Administration” (1958) 4 J.S.P.T.L. 217.

^{page 452 note 48} “Mistake in the Law of Theft” [1977] C.L.J. 62; “Theft, Consent and Illegality” [1977] Crim. L.R. 127, 205, 327; “Theft and Voidable Title” [1981] Crim. L.R. 666.

^{page 452 note 49} Ten were reprinted at [1991] C.L.J. 1.

^{page 452 note 50} [1952] 2 All E.R. 842.

^{page 452 note 51} p. 122.

^{page 452 note 52} [1939]27 C.A.R. 86; p. 132.

^{page 452 note 53} Hallam [1957] 1 Q.B. 569.

^{page 452 note 54} [1921] 2 K.B. 119; pp. 140–147.

^{page 452 note 55} Gould [1968] 2 Q.B. 65.

^{page 452 note 56} [1952] 2 Q.B. 826; pp. 324–327.

^{page 452 note 57} (1920) 84 J.P. 63; pp. 491–503.

^{page 452 note 58} [1985] A.C. 560.

^{page 452 note 59} [1986] C.L.J. 33–83.

^{page 452 note 60} Shivpuri [1987] A.C. 1.

^{page 452 note 61} pp. 267–274.

^{page 453 note 62} Slatcher v. George Mence Smith Ltd. [1951] 1 K.B. 631.

^{page 453 note 63} p. 244.

^{page 453 note 64} p. 253.

^{page 453 note 65} p. 288.

^{page 453 note 66} p. 310.

^{page 453 note 67} Ibid.

^{page 453 note 68} p. 395; and cf. “The Draft Code and Reliance upon Official Statements” (1989) 9 L.S. 177.

^{page 453 note 69} “The Mens Rea for Murder: Leave it Alone” (1989) 105 L.Q.R. 387,390; and see too “Rationality in Murder” (1991) 11 L.S. 204.

^{page 453 note 70} H.L. Paper (Session 1988–89) 78–1, pp. 121–126.

^{page 454 note 71} “The Criminal Responsibility of Children” [1954] Crim. L.R. 493, 495–196; cited, approvingly, C. v. DPP. [1996] A.C. 1 (Lord Lowry).

^{page 454 note 72} “The Reasonable Man in Provocation” [1954] Crim. L.R. 740, 742.

^{page 454 note 73} “Finis for Novus Actus?” [1989] C.L.J. 391, 397.

^{page 455 note 74} p. 127.

^{page 455 note 75} p. 184.

^{page 455 note 76} p. 208, and “The Fetus and the ‘Right of Life’ ” [1994] C.L.J. 71.

^{page 455 note 77} pp. 161–162; and, e.g., pp. 212, 276.

^{page 456 note 1} 3rd ed. (Stevens and Sons 1963).Google Scholar

^{page 456 note 2} Ibid., p. 302.

^{page 456 note 3} Ibid., p. 200.

^{page 456 note 4} Ibid., p. 128.

^{page 456 note 5} Ibid. p. 80.

^{page 456 note 6} Eleventh Report: Evidence (General), Cmnd. 4991 (1972).

^{page 457 note 7} (1973) Cmnd. 5184 p. 10.

^{page 458 note 8} “Questioning by the Police: Some Practical Considerations” [1960] Crim. L.R. 325; “Police Interrogation, Privileges and Limitations: England” (1961) 52 Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 458 note 9} “Authentication of Statements to the Police” [1979] Crim. L.R. 6.

^{page 458 note 10} “Evidence of Identification: The Devlin Report” [1976] Crim. L.R. 407.

^{page 458 note 11} p. 332.

^{page 458 note 12} “The Corroboration Question” (1987) 137 N.L.J. 131, 132.

^{page 458 note 13} The Proof of Guilt (3rd ed.), p. 334Google Scholar

^{page 459 note 14} “The Logic of Exceptions” [1988] C.L.J. 261.

^{page 459 note 15} “Questioning by the Police: Some Practical Considerations” [1960] Crim. L.R. 325, 341.

^{page 459 note 16} The Proof of Guilt (3rd ed.), pp. 213–243.Google Scholar

^{page 460 note 17} The Proof of Guilt (3rd ed.), pp. 195–209;Google Scholar “The [Criminal Law Revision Committee's] Proposals for Hearsay Evidence” [1973] Crim. L.R. 76.

^{page 461 note 18} “The Tactic of Silence” (1987) 137N.L.J. 1107.

^{page 461 note 19} “The Work of Criminal Law Reform” (1975) 13 Jo. S.P.T.L. 183, 193.

^{page 461 note 20} “Child Witnesses”, in Smith, Peter (ed.) Essays in Honour of J. C. Smith (Butterworths 1987), 188;Google Scholar “Videotaping Children's Evidence” (1987) 137 N.L.J. 108; “The Corroboration Question”, ibid. 131; “More About Videotaping Children” ibid. 369. “Child Witnesses and Video-technology: Thoughts for the Home Office” (1987) 51 Journal of Criminal Law 444CrossRefGoogle Scholar, though published under my name, was really a joint effort.

^{page 461 note 21} The proceedings were published as Spencer, J.R., Nicholson, G., Flin, R. andBull, R. (eds.),Children's Evidence in Legal Proceedings, an International Perspective (Cambridge Law Faculty 1990).Google Scholar

^{page 461 note 22} Report of the Advisory Group on Video Evidence (Home Office, December 1989).

^{page 462 note 23} See his article “Questioning by the Police: some Practical Considerations” [1960] Crim. L.R. 325, and also his remarks in “The Work of Criminal Law Reform”, (1975) 13 Jo. S.P.T.L. 183, 187.

^{page 462 note 1} [1954] Crim. L.R. 6.

^{page 462 note 2} “Arrest for Felony at Common Law” [1954] Crim. L.R. 408; “Interpretation of Statutory Powers of Arrest Without Warrant” [1958] Crim. L.R. 73,154. He had already written a piece, “Demanding Name and Address” (1950) 66L.Q.R. 465.

^{page 463 note 3} “Statutory Power of Search and Arrest on the Ground of Unlawful Possession” [1960] Crim. L.R. 598.

^{page 463 note 4} 15M.L.R. 98.

^{page 463 note 5} He was one of three dissentients to the 11th Report of the Criminal Law Revision Committee, (1972) Cmnd. 4991, para 52; “The Authentication of Statements to (he Police” [1979] Crim. L.R. 6.

^{page 463 note 6} “The ‘right of silence’ and the mental element” [1988] Crim. L.R. 97; “The tactic of silence” (1977) 137 New Law Jo., 1107.

^{page 463 note 7} [1954] Crim. L.R. 578.

^{page 463 note 8} (1991)54 M.L.R. 408.

^{page 463 note 9} “Criminal Attempts—A Reply” [1962] Crim. L.R. 300.

^{page 463 note 10} “Two Problems in Criminal Attempts” (1957) 70 Harv. L.R. 422; “Two Problems in Criminal Attempts Re-Examined—I and II” [1962] Crim. L.R. 135, 212.

^{page 463 note 11} “Attempting the impossible—the last round?” (1985) 135 New L.J. 337.

^{page 463 note 12} [1985] A.C. 567.

^{page 463 note 13} “The Lords and Impossible Attempts, or Quis Custodies Ipsos Custodes?” [1986] C.L.J. 33.

^{page 464 note 14} [1987] A.C. 1.

^{page 464 note 15} Above, n. 13.

^{page 465 note 16} But one of the seminal works in the field, S.A. de Smith's Judicial Review of Administrative Action began life as a doctoral dissertation begun under Glanville's supervision.

^{page 465 note 17} Criminal Law: The General Part (2nd ed., 1963) § 184.

^{page 465 note 18} “Power to Prosecute” [1955] Crim. L.R. 596, [1956] Crim. L.R. 67.

^{page 465 note 19} “International Law and the Controversy Concerning the Word ‘Law’” (1945) 22 B.Y.B.I.L. 134; “Language and the Law” (1945) 61 L.Q.R. 71, 179, 293, 384; (1946) 62 L.Q.R. 387.

^{page 465 note 20} “Statute Interpretation, Prostitution and the Rule of Law” in Tapper, C.F.H. (ed.), Crime Proof and Punishment (1981) 71;Google Scholar “Law and Fact” [1976] Crim. L.R. 472, 532.

^{page 465 note 21} The Reform of the Law (1951), p. 19.