Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:46:14.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lost in Translation

Cultural Obstructions Impede Living Kidney Donation among Minority Ethnic Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2012

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Section: Empirical Ethics
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Living donation rates in Norway (4.8 million) are among the highest in the world (36 per million in 2008). Most patients receive a kidney within one year on the deceased-donor waiting list. See Leivestad T. Annual report. The Norwegian Renal Registry (Norsk Nefrologiregister). Oslo 2009.

2. See note 1, Leivestad 2009.

3. Jenum, AK, Holme, I, Graff-Iversen, S, Birkeland, KI.Ethnicity and sex are strong determinants of diabetes in an urban Western society: Implications for prevention. Diabetologia 2005 Mar;48(3):435–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Kumar B, Grøtvedt HE Meyer, Søgaard AJ, Strand BH. The Oslo Health Immigrant Profile. Report from Folkehelseinstituttet 2008:7

5. Randhawa G. Renal health disparities in the United Kingdom: A focus on ethnicity. Seminars in Nephrology 2010;30(1):8–11.

6. Burden, AC, McNally, PG, Feehally, J, Walls, J.Increased incidence of end-stage renal failure secondary to diabetes mellitus in Asian ethnic groups in the United Kingdom. Diabetic Medicine 1992 Aug–Sep;9(7):641–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

7. Randhawa, G. Organ donation and transplantation: The realities for minority ethnic groups in the UK. In: Weimar, W, Bos, B, Buschback, JJ, eds. Organ Transplantation: Ethical, Legal and Psychosocial Aspects Towards a Common European Policy. Lengerich: Pabst; 2008.Google Scholar

8. Blom S. Innvandreres helse 2005/2006. Statistics Norway; 2008.

9. Hymes, Dell. On communicative competence. In: Duranti A, ed. Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell 2001.

10. Faden, RR, Beauchamp, TL, King, NMP.A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986.Google Scholar

11. O’Neill, O.Some limits of informed consent. Journal of Medical Ethics 2003 Feb 1;29(1):47, at 4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

12. Bourdieu, P, Thompson, JB.Language and Symbolic Power. (trans. Raymond, G, Adamson, M). Cambridge: Polity Press; 1991, at 164.Google Scholar

13. Aid to Capacity Evaluation (ACE); see http://www.utoronto.ca/jcb/disclaimers/ace.htm.

14. Grisso T, Appelbaum PS, Hill-Fotouhi C. The MacCAT-T: A clinical tool to assess patients’ capacities to make treatment decisions. Psychiatric Services 1997 Nov;48(11):1415–9.

15. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA 1992 Apr 22/29;267(16):2221–6.

16. Moazam, F.Bioethics and Organ Transplantation in a Muslim Society. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press; 2006.Google Scholar

17. Alnaes AH. Narratives: An essential tool for evaluating living kidney donations. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 2012;15(2):181–94.