Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T09:37:53.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Psychological Structure of Patient Autonomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2002

BRUCE N. WALLER
BRUCE N. WALLER
Affiliation:
Philosophy and Graduate Studies in Bioethics at Youngstown State University, Youngstown, Ohio.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The patient's right to informed consent is grudgingly acknowledged by medical professionals, firmly established in law, and brandished as a shibboleth by most bioethicists. But questions remain concerning genuine patient autonomy, and the doctrine of informed consent offers inadequate answers. In addition to the continuing controversy over what counts as “informed,” the passive acquiescence implied by “consent” seems a pale shadow of genuine autonomy.

Type
SPECIAL SECTION: AUTONOMY: THE DELICATE BALANCE
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , July 2002 , pp. 257 - 265
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)