Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T02:48:09.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Retrieving the Moral in the Ethics of Maternal-Fetal Surgery

A Response to “Fetal Repair of Open Neural Tube Defects: Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues by Julia Radic, Judy Illes, Patrick McDonald” (CQ28(3))

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2020

VIRGINIA L. BARTLETT  and
MARK J. BLITON
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Open-uterine surgery to repair spina bifida, or ‘fetal surgery of open neural tube defects,’ has generated questions throughout its history—and continues to do so in a variety of contexts. As clinical ethics consultants who worked (Mark J. Bliton) and trained (Virginia L. Bartlett) at Vanderbilt University—where the first successful cases of open-uterine repair of spina bifida were carried out—we lived with these questions for nearly two decades. We worked with clinicians as they were developing and offering the procedure, with researchers in refining and studying the procedure, and with pregnant women and their partners as they considered whether to undergo the procedure. From this experience in the early studies at Vanderbilt, we learned that pregnant women and their partners approach the clinical uncertainty of such a risky procedure with a curious and unique combination of practicality, self-reflection, fear, and overwhelming hope. These early experiences were a major contributing factor to the inclusion of an ethics-focused interview in the informed consent process for the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) trial study design.

Type
Departments and Columns
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , July 2020 , pp. 480 - 493
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Acknowledgements: Both authors would like to thank Richard M. Zaner for his ground-breaking work in Clinical Ethics, which enabled and supported the ethics work at Vanderbilt University; our colleague Stuart G. Finder for the encouragement to respond here; and the pregnant women, clinicians, and fellow ethics consultants whose work on and through these ‘profoundest questions’ has undergirded the development and ongoing engagement with the moral and ethical challenges of maternal-fetal surgery.

References

Notes

1. Bliton, MJ, Zaner, RM. Over the cutting edge: how ethics consultation illuminates the moral complexity of open-uterine fetal repair of spina bifida and patient’s decision making. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 2001;12:346–60Google Scholar.

2. Radic, JAE, Illes, J, McDonald, P. Fetal repair of open neural tube defects: ethical, legal, and social issues. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2019;28(3):476–87. doi:10.1017/S0963180119000409CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

3. Bruner, JP, Tulipan, NB, Richards, WO, Arney, TL. Endoscopic coverage of fetal myelomeningocele in utero. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1999;180(1):153–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

4. Bruner, JP, Tulipan, NB, Richards, WO, Walsh, WF, Boehm, FH, Vrabcak, EK. In utero repair of myelomeningocele: a comparison of endoscopy and hysterotomy. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 2000;15(2):83–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

5. Bliton, MJ. Ethics: “Life before birth” and moral complexity in maternal-fetal surgery for spina bifida, Clinics in Perinatology 2003; 30 (3):449-464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

6. Bliton, MJ. Parental hope confronting scientific uncertainty: a test of ethics in maternal-fetal surgery for spina bifida. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005;48(3):595–607CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

7. Fetal surgery and the moral presence of the fetus. Conference. Vanderbilt University, March 11, 2000.

8. Williamson, J, Williamson, S. Parental voices: the positive impact of medical professionals. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005;48(3):512–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

9. Lyons, A. Parental voices: one parent’s thoughts on fetal surgery. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005;48(3):540–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10. Kennedy, D, Kennedy, L. Parental voices: our journey of grace. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005;48(3):534–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

11. Gonzalez-Abreu, MM. Parental voices: you get what you get and you don't get upset: a child's answer to life's biggest challenges. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005;48(3):527–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

12. Gonzalez-Abreu, EE. Parental voices: for angeline: a mother's reflection and emotional struggle with the loss of a typical child and how she stumbles into an unexpected world of special needs and the people who live there. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005;48(3):518–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13. See note 1, Radic et al. 2019, at 479.

14. Cher. If I could turn back time. Heart of Stone. Geffen: 1989. CD.

15. Bliton, MJ. Imagining a fetus: insights from talking with pregnant women about their decision to undergo open-uterine fetal surgery. In: Toombs, SK, ed. Handbook of Phenomenology and Medicine. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001:393–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16. See note 6, Bliton 2005.

17. Bliton, MJ. Ethics at the forefront: moral decisions and responsibility with spina bifida. In: Wyszynski, DF, ed. Neural Tube Defects: From Origin to Treatment. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006:371–88Google Scholar.

18. See note 6, Bliton 2005.

19. Bliton, MJ. Maternal-fetal surgery and the ‘profoundest question in ethics.’ In: Ford, PJ, Dudzinski, DM, eds. Complex Ethics Consultations: Cases That Haunt Us. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008:36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20. Fry, J, Frader, J. We want to do everything”: How parents represent their experiences with maternal–fetal surgery online. Journal of Perinatology 2018; 38(3):226–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21. Fletcher, J. Spina bifida with myelomeningocele: a case study in attitudes toward defective newborns. In: Swinyard, CA, ed. Decision Making and the Defective Newborn: Proceedings of a Conference on Sonia Bifida and Ethics. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas; 1978:281–303Google Scholar.

22. Gross, RH, Cox, A, Tatyrek, R, Pollay, M, Barnes, WA. Early management and decision making for the treatment of myelomeningocele. Pediatrics 1983;72:450–8Google ScholarPubMed.

23. See note 6, Bliton 2005.

24. Spina Bifida Association (SBA). "Frequently asked questions about spina bifida." Spina Bifida Association of America; available at http://www.spinabifidaassociation.org/site/c.liKWL7PLLrF/b.2642327/k.5899/FAQ_About_Spina_Bifida.htm (last accessed 22 May 2010).

25. Darling, RB. Parents, physicians, and spina bifida. Hastings Center Report 1977;7(4):10–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

26. Oakeshott, P, Hunt, GM. Long-term outcome in open spina bifida. British Journal of General Practice 2003;53(493):632–6Google ScholarPubMed.

27. Aschoff, A, Kremer, P, Hashemi, B, Kunze, S. The scientific history of hydrocephalus and its treatment. Neurosurgery Review 1999;22(2–3):67–93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

28. Freeman, J. To treat or not to treat?. In: Freeman, J. Practical Management of Meningomyelocele. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press; 1974Google Scholar.

29. Lorber, J. Early results of selective treatment of spina bifida cystica. British Medical Journal 1973;4(5886):201–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

30. Lorber, J. Results of treatment of myelomeningocele. Developmental Medicine & Children's Neurology 1971;13(3)279–303CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

31. Gross, RH. Newborns with myelodysplasia―The rest of the story. New England Journal of Medicine 1985;312(25):1632–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

32. Ahmad. Back in the Day. Ahmad. Giant/Reprise Records: 1994.

33. See note 27, Aschoff et al. 1999.

34. Bowman, RM, McLone, DG, Grant, JA, Tomita, T, Ito, JA. Spina bifida outcomes: a 25-year prospective. Pediatric Neurosurgery 2001;34(3)114–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35. Fichter, MA, Dornseifer, U, Henke, J, Schneider, KT, Kovacs, L, Biemer, E, Bruner, J, et al.Fetal spina bifida repair―current trends and prospects of intrauterine neurosurgery. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 2008;23(4):163–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36. Bruner, JP. In their footsteps: a brief history of maternal-fetal surgery. Clinics in Perinatology 2003;30(3): 439–47CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

37. Bruner, JP; Tulipan, N, Paschall, R, Boehm, FH, Walsh, W, Silva, SR, et al. Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele and the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus.  JAMA 1999;282(19):1819–25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

38. Bruner, JP, Tulipan, NB. Intrauterine repair of spina bifida. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005;48(4):942–55CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

39. Tulipan, N, Sutton, LN, Bruner, JP, Cohen, BM, Johnson, M, Adzick, NS. The effect of intrauterine myelomeningocele repair on the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus. Pediatric Neurosurgery 2003;38(1):27–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

40. Adzick, NSThom, EA, Spring, CY, Brock, JW, Burrows, PK, Johnson, MP, et al.A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. New England Journal of Medicine 2011;364(11):993–1004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

41. See note 40, Adzick et al. 2011, at 1001.

42. See note 2, Radic et al. 2019, at 482.

43. See note 6, Bliton 2005.

44. Aphorism, circa 1770s, attributed to both Marie Antoinette and her dressmaker, Rose Bertin.

45. See note 6, Bliton 2005.

46. See note 2, Radic et al. 2019, at 479.

47. Simpson, JL, Greene, MF. Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele? New England Journal of Medicine 2011;364(11):1076–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

48. In the Vanderbilt elective series between 1997–2003, 178 women underwent the procedure at Vanderbilt and 52 (23%) declined the surgery. For those who underwent the procedure, the repair was done at 19–30 weeks; and the women delivered between 25 and 38 weeks.

49. Amos, Tori. Cornflake Girl. Under the Pink. Atlantic Records. 1994Google Scholar.

50. National Institutes of Heatlh. MOMS Trial protocol, 2003.

51. Ruddick, W, Wilcox, W. Operating on the fetus. Hastings Center Report 1982;12(5):11Google ScholarPubMed.

52. Fletcher, JC, Jonsen, AR. Ethical consideration is fetal treatment. In: Harrison, MR, Golbus, MS, Filly, RA, eds. The Unborn Patient: Prenatal Diagnosis and Treatment, 2nd ed. Philadelphia:W.B. Saunders Company; 1990:14–8Google Scholar.

53. See note 50, National Institutes of Health 2003.

54. Barenaked ladies. everything old Is new again. Maybe You Should Drive. Sire Records, 1994.

55. See See note 2, Radic et al. 2019, at 476.

56. See See note 40, Adzick et al. 2011:1001–2.

57. See notes 10–14, above.

58. See note 6, Bliton 2005.

59. Churchill, LR, Bliton, MJ. Foreword. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005;48(3):509–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60. See note 21, Bliton [year].

61. Zaner, RM. Parental voices: randal lewis morris was born. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005;48(3):548–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62. Bartlett, VL. Women's Expereinces with Medical, Social, and Moral Issues of Open-Uterine Surgery to Repair Spina Bifida. Dissertation, Vanderbilt University, 2010Google Scholar.

63. Rothschild, BB, Estroff, SE, Churchill, LR. The cultural calculus of consent. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005;48(3):574–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64. The Smiths. What difference does it make? The Smiths. Rough Trade Records. 1984.

65. Mitchell, Joni. All I Want. Blue. Reprise Records. 1971Google Scholar.

66. See note 6, Bliton 2005.

67. See note 1, Bliton, Zaner 2001.

68. Chapman, Tracy. Talkin’ about a revolution. Tracy Chapman. Elektra Records. 1988Google Scholar.

69. Adzick, NS. Fetal myelomeningocele: natural history, pathophysiology, and in-utero intervention. Seminars in Fetal Neonatalogy & Medicine 2010;15(1):9–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

70. Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. A comprehensive ethical framework for fetal research and its application to fetal surgery for spina bifida. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 2002;187(1):10–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

71. Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Ethics of fetal surgery. Clinics in Perinatology 2009;36(2):237–46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

72. See notes 10–14 above.

73. Jonsen, AR. The ethics of fetal surgery. In: Milunsky, A, Annas, GJ, eds. Genetics and the Law I I I: National Symposium on Genetics and the Law, 1984. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1985Google Scholar.

74. Talking Heads. Once in a lifetime. Remain in Light. Sire Records. 1981.

75. Heinlein, RA. Time Enough for Love, the Lives of Lazarus Long; a Novel. New York, NY: Putnam; 1973:19Google Scholar.