^{page 9 note 1} 29 September, 1295.

^{page 9 note 2} 20 October, 1307.

^{page 9 note 3} Now among Exchequer Writs 3.

^{page 9 note 4} 25 December, 1299.

^{page 9 note 5} 2 February, 1300. This debt was first acknowledged by Thornton in the exchequer on 5 February, 1299, as for grain bought from Sawley in the preceding autumn. When the sheriff of Nottingham certified the exchequer on 14 February, 1299, that the statute merchant had been made, the exchequer recognizance was annulled. K.R.Mem. 72, m. 46d.

^{page 10 note 1} 29 September 1304.

^{page 10 note 2} 25 December, 1304.

^{page 10 note 3} 2 February, 1305.

^{page 11 note 1} 20 January, 1308.

^{page 11 note 2} 28 April, 1308.

^{page 11 note 3} The case was continued from term to term until xv Michaelmas, 1309.

^{page 11 note 4} 6 June, 1305.

^{page 12 note 1} 28 April, 1308. The case was continued from term to term until xv Michaelmas, 1309, when it was dismissed because no recognizance was found.

^{page 12 note 2} A similar heading appears at the top of each new membrane; these repetitive headings have been omitted in this edition.

^{page 12 note 3} 28 April, 1308.

^{page 12 note 4} The case was continued from term to term until xv Easter, 1309, when it was dismissed because no recognizance was found.

^{page 13 note 1} 25 March, 1306.

^{page 13 note 2} 24 June, 1306.

^{page 13 note 3} 14 April, 1308.

^{page 13 note 4} 30 March, 1309.

^{page 13 note 5} 16 June, 1308. The case was continued from term to term until the morrow of the close of Easter, 1309.

^{page 13 note 6} 1309.

^{page 13 note 7} 1310.

^{page 13 note 8} 22 May, 1306.

^{page 14 note 1} C.P.R. 1307–1313, p. 20.Google Scholar

^{page 14 note 2} 16 June, 1308.

^{page 14 note 3} 25 June, 1308.

^{page 14 note 4} Receipt Rolls 1772, 1773. Said to be for land bought from Langeton.

^{page 14 note 5} Ibid., paid 15 October, 1308.

^{page 14 note 6} 1309.

^{page 14 note 7} 1310.

^{page 15 note 1} 1310.

^{page 15 note 2} K.R.Mem. 84, mm. 40, 104.

^{page 15 note 3} 1311.

^{page 15 note 4} 18 November. The abbot was William of Aslakby.

^{page 15 note 5} K.R.Mem. 78, m. 41d. Michaelmas, 1305.

^{page 15 note 6} K.R.Mem. 79, m. 52. Easter, 1306.

^{page 16 note 1} 7 December.

^{page 16 note 2} C.P.R. 1307–1313, p. 26.Google Scholar

^{page 17 note 1} This was not the end of the case. Langeton tried unsuccessfully to collect 1,125 marks from Selby in 1318 and refused to give back the letter of obligation, although the abbot had paid 1,125 marks to the king and 675 marks to Langeton. However in 1329 his executors, who still had the recognizance, although it had been annulled in the exchequer, tried to collect 1,600 marks of the debt and 1,000 marks damages before justices of assize in Northampton. The justices took no action and the parties were sine die. C.C.R. 1318–1323, p. 32Google Scholar; C.P.R. 1327–1330, p. 488Google Scholar; Assize Roll 629, m. 199.

^{page 17 note 2} Skyllar, Hugh. V.C.H.Lancs. ii, 130Google Scholar notes that he occurs 1297. John de Cockerham became abbot in 1303 when Hugh Skyllar was deposed.

^{page 17 note 3} K.R.Mem. 76, m. 41d.

^{page 18 note 1} Receipt Rolls 1772, 1773. Paid on 24 January, 1308.

^{page 18 note 2} See Leuknore case, p. 278.

^{page 19 note 1} 6 March, 1308.

^{page 20 note 1} 28 April, 1308.

^{page 20 note 2} 16 June, 1308.

^{page 21 note 1} 13 April, 1309.

^{page 21 note 2} 25 July, 1306.

^{page 21 note 3} 21 December, 1306.

^{page 22 note 1} 7 December, 1307.

^{page 23 note 1} 28 April, 1308.

^{page 23 note 2} 16 June, 1308.

^{page 23 note 3} 13 April, 1309.

^{page 23 note 4} Popard made appearances by attorney until xv Hilary, 1311.

^{page 24 note 1} 28 April, 1308.

^{page 24 note 2} 16 June, 1308.

^{page 24 note 3} The case was continued from term to term until xv Michaelmas, 1309, when it was dismissed because no recognizance was found. The exchequer stopped trying to get the estate accounts into court in the preceding Hilary term.

^{page 25 note 1} C.C.R. 1288–1296, p. 380.Google Scholar

^{page 25 note 2} 25 April, 1294.

^{page 25 note 3} The case was continued from term to term until the morrow of St John the Baptist (25 June), 1311.

^{page 27 note 1} Receipt Rolls 1772, 1773. Payment is said to be on an exchequer recognizance.

^{page 27 note 2} Ibid., also on an exchequer recognizance.

^{page 27 note 3} C.P.R. 1307–1313, p. 137.Google Scholar

^{page 28 note 1} C.P.R. 1307–1313, p. 205Google Scholar. Indemnity for the Ballardi against claims by Langeton.

^{page 28 note 2} Paid to the Ballardi, by 26 01, 1310Google Scholar, who had been granted immunity against Langeton's claims in 1308. C.P.R. 1307–1313, p. 144Google Scholar. See p. 215.

^{page 29 note 1} 9 October, 1307.

^{page 29 note 2} In margin: habet breue inter communia de hoc anno quod atterminetur etc. Ideo cesset breue de fieri facias de precepto thesaurarii.

^{page 29 note 3} Orford, Robert, 1302–1310Google Scholar. C.F.R. 1307–1319, p. 29.Google Scholar

^{page 30 note 1} It had been suggested earlier that if the bishop wished to make a recognizance to the king, payable in two years, Langeton's recognizance would be returned to him. The bishop came to the exchequer at Michaelmas, as stated above, and said he would be at the next parliament at Northampton (18 October, 1307) sufficiently instructed to certify the king and council concerning his indebtedness. K.R.Mem. 81, m. 36.

^{page 32 note 1} Part payment for 140 m. for wages and horses lost in Scotland and annual fee in the wardrobe. C.P.R. 1307–1313, p. 269.Google Scholar

^{page 33 note 1} Salmon, John, 1299–1325.Google Scholar

^{page 33 note 2} About 4 August, 1307.

^{page 33 note 3} 24 March, 1308.

^{page 33 note 4} K.R.Mem. 83, m. 48.

^{page 34 note 1} C.P.R. 1307–1313, p. 213.Google Scholar

^{page 34 note 2} See p. 132.

^{page 35 note 1} The membrane is torn at the edge and partially unreadable.

^{page 35 note 2} 17 May, 1304.

^{page 36 note 1} 5 May, 1308.

^{page 37 note 1} K.R.Mem. 70, m. 70d.

^{page 37 note 2} 12 May, 1297.

^{page 39 note 1} Langeton was trying to collect this debt in 1314. Exch. Plea Roll 36, m. 30.

^{page 40 note 1} 10 November, 1306.

^{page 40 note 2} 9 April, 1307.

^{page 40 note 3} 14 May, 1307.

^{page 40 note 4} 1 May, 1306.

^{page 40 note 5} 30 November, 1306.

^{page 40 note 6} 9 April, 1307.

^{page 40 note 7} 9 November, 1306.

^{page 40 note 8} For 16 years from April, 1300. C.P.R. 1292–1301, p. 503.Google Scholar

^{page 44 note 1} K.R.Mem. 79, m. 52.

^{page 44 note 2} K.R.Mem. 80, m. 59.

^{page 44 note 3} 18 May, 1307.

^{page 45 note 1} Langeton was trying to collect £19 in 1314. Exch. Plea Roll 36, m. 30.

^{page 45 note 2} K.R.Mem. 78, m. 45 (25 January, 1305).

^{page 46 note 1} The case was continued from term to term until xv Michaelmas, 1311.

^{page 46 note 2} 17 July, 1302. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 46 note 3} 7 April, 1303.

^{page 47 note 1} K.R.Mem. 78, m. 43.

^{page 47 note 2} Walter of Clipston, appointed 1303, died 1310. V.C.H.Lancs, vi, 87Google Scholar; Cal. Papal Registers, Letters, 1198–1304, p. 611.Google Scholar

^{page 47 note 3} 18 September, 1302.

^{page 47 note 4} Langeton was trying to collect the remainder in 1314. Exch. Plea Roll 36, m. 30.

^{page 48 note 1} 23 December, 1293. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 48 note 2} 23 June, 1294. Loc. cit.

^{page 48 note 3} 22 September, 1290. Loc. cit.

^{page 49 note 1} 9 March, 1291. Exch. Writs, 3.

^{page 49 note 2} The case was continued from term to term until xv Michaelmas, 1309, when it was dismissed because no recognizance was found.

^{page 49 note 3} 22 November, 1306. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 49 note 4} See p. 311.

^{page 50 note 1} The case was continued from term to term until xv Michaelmas. 1310.

^{page 52 note 1} C.C.R., 1288–1296, p. 441.Google Scholar

^{page 56 note 1} 29 May, 1309.

^{page 56 note 2} 1 May, 1295.

^{page 56 note 3} K.R.Mem. 79, m. 46.

^{page 57 note 1} The case was continued from term to term until 1 June, 1310, when it was reported that fitz Reginald had died. A new action was begun against his heirs.

^{page 57 note 2} K.R.Mem. 74, m. 41d.

^{page 58 note 1} 28 April, 1308. Receipt Roll 1773.

^{page 58 note 2} Loc. cit.

^{page 58 note 3} 15 May, 1305. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 58 note 4} See p. 126.

^{page 59 note 1} 7 November, 1301. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 59 note 2} 29 June, 1305. Loc. cit.

^{page 59 note 3} 15 March, 1306. Loc. cit.

^{page 61 note 1} De Banco Roll 163, m. 256d.

^{page 61 note 2} De Banco Roll 164, m. 327d.

^{page 62 note 1} C.C.R. 1302–1307, p. 519.Google Scholar

^{page 64 note 1} 15 December, 1306.

^{page 65 note 1} The case was continued from term to term until 1312 when Langeton's debts were returned to him.

^{page 65 note 2} August, 1302. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 65 note 3} The case was continued from term to term until Michaelmas, 1309, when it was dismissed because no recognizance was found.

^{page 66 note 1} 30 November, 1301.

^{page 67 note 1} C.C.R. 1296–1302, p. 388.Google Scholar

^{page 68 note 1} Michaelmas 1301. K.R.Mem. 74, m. 41.

^{page 70 note 1} In 1311 the bishop of Norwich paid £29 2s. 11½d. from the goods of Richard Immere. K.R.Mem. 84, m. 104.

^{page 70 note 2} 18 December, 1291. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 70 note 3} The case was continued from term to term until Trinity term, 1309, when it was dismissed because no recognizance was found.

^{page 71 note 1} 16 March, 1300. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 72 note 1} See p. 258.

^{page 72 note 2} The case was continued from term to term until xv Michaelmas, 1309, when it was dismissed because no recognizance was found.

^{page 72 note 3} 22 July, 1307. Exch. Writs 3. This seems to be further evidence that the news of Edward I's death was not confirmed in London until late in July. The king died on 7 July but the chancellor said he had no certain knowledge of his death until 25 July, and the close and patent rolls both begin the new reign on 26 August. C.F.R. 1271–1307, pp. 558, 559Google Scholar. The feast day of Queen Margaret was 8 July, but the Saturday following, the 15th, would not fit the regnal year.

^{page 73 note 1} Receipt Rolls 1772, 1773.

^{page 73 note 2} Receipt Rolls 1772, 1773. 100s. paid 21 January 1309; 100s. paid 9 April, 1309. C.P.R. 1307–1313, p. 110.Google Scholar

^{page 74 note 1} Receipt Rolls 1772, 1773. See p. 148.

^{page 74 note 2} 29 May, 1300. K.R.Mem. 73, m. 31.

^{page 74 note 3} Receipt Roll 1773.

^{page 74 note 4} Hilary, 1303. K.R.Mem. 76, m. 42.

^{page 74 note 5} 1 August, 1303.

^{page 74 note 6} Michaelmas, 1304. K.R.Mem. 78, m. 43.

^{page 74 note 7} 18 April, 1305.

^{page 75 note 1} 8 June, 1307.

^{page 76 note 1} 3 December, 1306.

^{page 76 note 2} 26 March, 1307.

^{page 76 note 3} See p. 194.

^{page 77 note 1} 10 October, 1299.

^{page 77 note 2} The return by the mayor and clerk of the statute merchant in York contains six recognizances from Maule to Langeton between 1297 and 1302 amounting in all to £388 6s. 8d. These were apparently not acted upon at this time, probably because, as stated above, Langeton had already brought suit and seized Maule's lands. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 77 note 3} K.R.Mem. 79, m. 50d.

^{page 77 note 4} 27 January, 1307.

^{page 78 note 1} 21 July, 1307.

^{page 79 note 1} 8 May, 1308.

^{page 79 note 2} 11 July, 1307.

^{page 79 note 3} The case was continued from term to term until xv Michaelmas, 1309, when it was dismissed because it was verified from the letters of acquitance and the returns of the writs that the debt had been paid.

^{page 80 note 1} 30 January, 1301. C.C.R. 1296–1302, p. 475.Google Scholar

^{page 80 note 2} Receipt Roll. 1772.

^{page 81 note 1} C.C.R. 1288–1296, p. 378Google Scholar. 3 December, 1293 (sic).

^{page 81 note 2} Coram Rege Rolls 185, m. 13; 188, m. 25d; 189, m. 14. Orders to levy debt.

^{page 81 note 3} Easter, 1306. K.R.Mem. 79, m. 51.

^{page 82 note 1} £10 was paid 20 June, 1308 (Receipt Rolls 1772, 1773) and £31 10s. in Michaelmas term 1309. The case was continued until Hilary, 1311, m. 50.

^{page 83 note 1} Receipt Roll 1772.

^{page 83 note 2} Langeton was trying to collect £96 6s. 8d. in 1314. Exch. Plea Roll 36, m. 30.

^{page 84 note 1} 20 March, 1298. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 84 note 2} Trinity term, 1305. K.R.Mem. 78, m. 47.

^{page 85 note 1} 27 November, 1307.

^{page 86 note 1} The whole debt was paid in 1311. K.R.Mem. 84, m. 102.

^{page 86 note 2} 29 May, 1307. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 87 note 1} This writ is printed in Davies, J. Conway, The Baronial Opposition to Edward II. p. 568.Google Scholar

^{page 87 note 2} 25 May. 1298.

^{page 87 note 3} 19 April, 1299.

^{page 87 note 4} 18 April, 1299. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 87 note 5} 18 March, 1300. Loc. cit.

^{page 87 note 7} January, 1301. Loc. cit.

^{page 90 note 1} 18 April, 1299.

^{page 92 note 1} See pp. 178–79.

^{page 92 note 2} Trinity term, 1307. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 92 note 3} Receipt Roll. 1772.

^{page 93 note 1} Both recognizances were made in Trinity term, 1306. K.R.Mem. 79, m. 53d.

^{page 94 note 1} The following note is written here, with a symbol:

Respice residuum huius processus inferius cum tali

signo quia non erat hic locus

^{page 94 note 2} In Michaelmas term, 1316, Langeton acknowledged in the exchequer the payment of the entire debt, after the case had been reheard in 1314. Exch. Plea Roll 36, m. 48.

^{page 94 note 3} 30 May, 1306. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 95 note 1} K.R.Mem. 81, m. 22d.

^{page 96 note 1} Trinity term, 1306. K.R.Mem. 79, m. 54.

^{page 96 note 2} Westminster, 20 October, 1308.

^{page 98 note 1} 16 October, 1306. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 98 note 2} This would have been another case of champarty.

^{page 99 note 1} The case was continued from term to term until xv Hilary, 1310, when it was dismissed because no recognizance was found.

^{page 99 note 2} 8 November, 1306. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 99 note 3} In June or early July, 1308. Receipt Roll 1773.

^{page 99 note 4} Receipt Roll 1773.

^{page 100 note 1} C.C.R. 1288–1296, p. 316.Google Scholar

^{page 100 note 2} Ibid. p. 478.

^{page 100 note 3} 5 May, 1292. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 101 note 1} 21 September, 1301.

^{page 102 note 1} Receipt Rolls 1772, 1773.

^{page 102 note 2} 6 November, 1306. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 102 note 3} See p. 258.

^{page 103 note 1} Easter term, 1306. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 103 note 2} Langeton's executors were trying to collect this debt in 1359 after postponement in 1308. Exch. Plea Roll 82 A, m. A32 (33 Edward III), after £33 17s. had been paid by 1314. Exch. Plea Roll 36, m. 49.

^{page 103 note 3} 10 June, 1307. Exch. Writs 3. See p. 197.

^{page 104 note 1} Receipt Rolls 1772, 1773.

^{page 104 note 2} Easter term, 1305. K.R.Mem. 78, m. 46.

^{page 105 note 1} The debt was paid by 1333, as acknowledged by John Langeton, Langeton's executor. Exch. Plea Roll 36, m. 30.

^{page 105 note 2} See p. 169.

^{page 106 note 1} K.R.Mem. 78, m. 43.

^{page 108 note 1} 6 February, 1308.

^{page 109 note 1} Edward I was at Condom on 7 April, 1289.

^{page 109 note 2} The case was continued from term to term until xv Hilary, 1311, after which time there is no further record. The case was still being heard in the exchequer in 1332, although Richard Loveday died in 1318, at which time some of his land was held by Langeton for a debt of £260. Exch. Plea Roll 59, m. 22; Cal. Inquis. Post Mortem vi, 85.Google Scholar

^{page 109 note 3} 26 March, 1307. See p. 187.

^{page 109 note 4} 14 May, 1307.

^{page 109 note 5} In margin: Postea soluit et scriptum sibi restituitur.

^{page 109 note 6} 6 October, 1307.

^{page 110 note 1} 1 August and 29 September. See p. 235.

^{page 111 note 1} Michaelmas term, 1305. K.R.Mem. 78, m. 46.

^{page 112 note 1} Receipt Roll 1772. On 27 February, 1309, Howel was given respite until Whitsun for the payment of £35 arrears on £100 due Langeton on an exchequer recognizance. C.C.R. 1307–1313, p. 137.Google Scholar

^{page 112 note 2} K.R.Mem. 74, m. 43d.; De Banco Roll 139, m. 215d.

^{page 113 note 1} 29 June.

^{page 113 note 2} 27 June, 1305.

^{page 114 note 1} Receipt Rolls 1772, 1773, where the date given is June 1308; C.P.R. 1307–1313, pp. 91, 96, 117, 351Google Scholar. The date for the payment of 60 li. is 20 June, 1311.

^{page 114 note 2} K.R.Mem. 90, mm. 79d, 80. Receipt Rolls, 1772, 1773.

^{page 114 note 3} The name of the place is omitted.

^{page 114 note 4} 24 January, 1312, payment of £20 was to be superseded because Tweng was ill. L.T.R.Mem. 82, m. 31. About the same time the debt was returned to Langeton. K.R.Mem. 85, m. 104. On 4 February, 1324 Langeton's executors acknowledged payment in full.

^{page 114 note 5} 26 June, 1306. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 115 note 1} 28 June, 1306. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 115 note 1} The case was continued from term to term until xv Michaelmas, 1309, when it was dismissed because no recognizance was found.

^{page 116 note 1} Trinity term 1307. L.T.R.Mem. 77, m. 78.

^{page 116 note 2} Receipt Roll 1772. On Receipt Roll 1773 this amount is entered for April, 1308.

^{page 116 note 3} K.R.Mem. 77, m. 37.

^{page 117 note 1} K.R.Mem. 79, m. 54.

^{page 117 note 2} Receipt Roll 1773.

^{page 118 note 1} K.R.Mem. 78, m. 44.

^{page 118 note 2} The debt was paid by 1329, according to Langeton's executors. K.R.Mem. 79, m. 54. Cf. Exch. Plea Roll 36, m. 49.

^{page 118 note 3} C.C.R. 1288–1296, p. 380.Google Scholar

^{page 119 note 1} Receipt Rolls 1772, 1773. On the following day he was given indemnity against future demands by Langeton. C.P.R. 1307–1313, p. 147.Google Scholar

^{page 119 note 2} C.C.R. 1296–1302, p. 589Google Scholar. where the amount given is £36 18s. 7d.

^{page 119 note 3} Receipt Roll 1772.

^{page 120 note 1} C.C.R. 1288–1296, p. 309.Google Scholar

^{page 121 note 1} 5 May, 1307.

^{page 122 note 1} See p. 220. John Vanne acknowledged payment of the debt 9 May, 1314. £25 had been paid 10 May, 1308. Receipt Rolls 1772, 1773. On Receipt Roll 1772 the debt is said to be on an exchequer recognizance.

^{page 122 note 2} 2 June, 1307. Exch. Writs 3 give amount of recognizance as £150.

^{page 123 note 1} 7 June, 1307.

^{page 124 note 1} Receipt Roll, 1772. On the De Banco Roll for Trinity term, 1307, there is a record of a debt of Santon to Langeton in the amount of 20 marks, which may be the same debt later changed to a statute merchant. It was also payable at Easter. De Banco Roll 164, m. 50d.

^{page 124 note 2} 20 January, 1305. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 125 note 1} The case was continued from term to term until xv Hilary, 1309, when it was dismissed because no recognizance was found.

^{page 125 note 2} 31 January, 1305. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 125 note 3} 20 April, 1306. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 126 note 1} See p. 225 below.

^{page 127 note 1} 18 May, 1305. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 127 note 2} 16 October, 1305. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 127 note 3} The case was continued from term to term until xv St John the Baptist, 1309, when it was dismissed because no recognizance was found among those held by Walter of Norwich, the treasurer's remembrancer.

^{page 128 note 1} Michaelmas, 1305. K.R.Mem. 78, m. 43d.

^{page 128 note 2} Receipt Roll 1773.

^{page 128 note 3} Receipt Roll 1772.

^{page 129 note 1} Langeton was trying to collect £63 7s. 8d. remaining on this debt in 1314. Exch. Plea Roll 36, m. 30.

^{page 129 note 2} Hilary, 1305. K.R.Mem. 78, m. 46d.

^{page 130 note 1} Trinity term. K.R.Mem. 78, m. 47d.

^{page 130 note 2} L.T.R.Mem. 78, m. 111d.

^{page 130 note 3} 1 February, 1304. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 131 note 1} 28 May, 1305.

^{page 131 note 2} 22 February, 1303.

^{page 132 note 1} 10 March, 1304.

^{page 132 note 2} 25 September, 1305.

^{page 132 note 3} In Exch. Writs 3. Middleton's report is said to have been given 9 December.

^{page 132 note 4} See p. 198.

^{page 132 note 5} See p. 244.

^{page 132 note 6} or 20 July.

^{page 133 note 1} See p. 200.

^{page 133 note 2} Loc. cit.

^{page 133 note 3} From 28 March to 7 or 23 July, 1307.

^{page 134 note 1} 23 January, 1308. Receipt Rolls 1772, 1773.

^{page 134 note 2} K.R.Mem. 81, m. 82. Stapleton was also ordered 28 May, 1308, to certify the exchequer as to the number and kind of sheep and other animals Langeton may have had on the manors of the hospital of St Leonard's at the time of his arrest and how many were still there and where and by whom any were taken away. He was also to clip the sheep, ship the wool to Boston and send the proceeds to the exchequer. Ibid., m. 85d.

^{page 134 note 3} Their report is in Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 134 note 4} 21 May, 1307.

^{page 135 note 1} His report is in Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 136 note 1} His report is in Exch. Writs 3. See p. 109.

^{page 137 note 1} 18 August, 1307.

^{page 139 note 1} K.R.Mem. 81, m. 18; L.T.R.Mem. 78, m. 22. This writ is printed by Conway Davies, p. 546. There is no indication as to the source of theserecommendations.

^{page 140 note 1} This heading, repeated more or less verbatim at the top of each new membrane, has been omitted hereafter.

^{page 140 note 2} 24 August, 1302.

^{page 140 note 3} 20 May.

^{page 142 note 1} 28 August, 1306.

^{page 143 note 1} 6 June, 1289. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 144 note 1} 12 January, 1307. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 145 note 1} 4 April, 1307.

^{page 145 note 2} The case was continued from term to term until Trinity term, 1309.

^{page 145 note 3} Receipt Rolls, 1772, 1773. The debt was said to be for grain bought at Fulmerston.

^{page 145 note 4} Op. cit.

^{page 145 note 5} Op. cit.

^{page 146 note 1} 19 August, 1306.

^{page 147 note 1} Receipt Rolls, 1772, 1773.

^{page 148 note 1} Receipt Rolls, 1772, 1773.

^{page 148 note 2} 27 August, 1300.

^{page 149 note 1} 27 August, 1301.

^{page 149 note 2} 29 January, 1301.

^{page 150 note 1} 28 November, 1301.

^{page 151 note 1} The case was continued from term to term until xv Hilary, 1310, when the record ends.

^{page 151 note 2} 22 May, 1306.

^{page 151 note 3} May, 1306.

^{page 152 note 1} The case was continued from term to term until xv Michaelmas, 1310, when it was dismissed because no recognizance was found.

^{page 152 note 2} 22 May, 1306.

^{page 153 note 1} The case was continued from term to term until xv Michaelmas, 1309, when it was dismissed because no recognizance was found.

^{page 154 note 1} 28 February, 1308.

^{page 154 note 2} The case was continued from term to term until xv St Martin, 1308.

^{page 154 note 3} 29 March, 1292. C.C.R. 1288–1296, p. 260.Google Scholar

^{page 155 note 1} K.R.Mem. 75, m. 37.

^{page 156 note 1} 28 December, 1293. C.C.R. 1288–1296, p. 380.Google Scholar

^{page 156 note 2} 20 May, 1296. Ibid., p. 511.

^{page 156 note 3} This part of the case was continued until xv Michaelmas, 1310, when the record ends.

^{page 157 note 1} 29 January, 6 August, or 15 October, 1302.

^{page 157 note 2} 5 December, 1310.

^{page 157 note 3} 13 November, 1306. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 158 note 1} Receipt Roll 1773.

^{page 158 note 2} Receipt Rolls 1772 (where the debt is said to be on an exchequer recognizance), 1773.

^{page 159 note 1} See p. 340.

^{page 159 note 2} The case was continued from term to term until the morrow of the Purification, 1310.

^{page 163 note 1} C.C.R. 1288–1296, p. 391Google Scholar, 12 August, 1294.

^{page 163 note 2} Execution ceased in 1312 because the debt was returned to Langeton. K.R.Mem. 85, m. 104.

^{page 163 note 3} The case was continued from term to term until xv Michaelmas, 1309, when it was dismissed because no recognizance was found.

^{page 164 note 1} 11 June, 1289.

^{page 164 note 2} Receipt Rolls 1772, 1773.

^{page 164 note 3} Receipt Roll 1772.

^{page 164 note 4} 5 July, 1307.

^{page 165 note 1} Receipt Rolls 1772, 1773.

^{page 166 note 1} Op. cit.

^{page 166 note 2} Michaelmas term, 1306. K.R.Mem. 79, m. 49.

^{page 166 note 3} Langeton was trying to collect this debt in 1314. Exch. Plea Roll 36, m. 30.

^{page 167 note 1} 4 May, 1301. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 167 note 2} 13 April, 1302. Loc. cit.

^{page 167 note 3} See p. 270.

^{page 168 note 1} 25 January, 1307. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 169 note 1} Repetitions of this heading are subsequently omitted.

^{page 169 note 2} Trinity term, 1305, K.R.Mem. 78, m. 48.

^{page 170 note 1} 16 August, 1306.

^{page 171 note 1} Receipt Roll 1772.

^{page 171 note 2} Langeton was trying to collect £13 3s. 8d. in 1314. Exch. Plea Roll 36, m. 30.

^{page 171 note 3} 8 May, 1308.

^{page 171 note 4} This was an exchequer recognizance. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 172 note 1} Receipt Rolls 1772, 1773.

^{page 172 note 2} Michaelmas term, 1296. K.R.Mem. 69, m. 42.

^{page 173 note 1} 2 January.

^{page 175 note 1} 7 December.

^{page 177 note 1} C.P.R. 1307–1313, p. 95.Google Scholar

^{page 177 note 2} See p. 200.

^{page 179 note 1} See pp. 87–92.

^{page 180 note 1} Michaelmas term, 1307. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 180 note 2} Receipt Rolls 1772, 1773.

^{page 181 note 1} The case was continued from term to term because in addition to the usual delays, the prior, Nicholas de Tarente, had died. At Michaelmas, 1310, the new prior, Richard de Enford, came.

^{page 182 note 1} C.P.R. 1307–1313, p. 399Google Scholar. Indemnity against Langeton for payment of 200 marks, 12 November, 1311.

^{page 182 note 2} 3 May, 1308. K.R.Mem. 81, m. 85d. See p. 3, n. 5.

^{page 183 note 1} 14 October, 1305.

^{page 184 note 1} 30 January, 1308.

^{page 185 note 1} K.R.Accounts Various 127/25. Particulars of accounts of debts of the Ballardi and other merchants to Langeton.

^{page 186 note 1} The case was continued from term to term, usually at the request of exchequer officials, until xv of Easter, 1310, when the record ends.

^{page 187 note 1} Receipt Rolls 1772, 1773.

^{page 188 note 1} 27 December, 1306.

^{page 188 note 2} 23 January, 1307.

^{page 188 note 3} 31 October, 1308. Receipt Rolls 1772, 1773.

^{page 188 note 4} Repetitions of this heading subsequently omitted.

^{page 191 note 1} 10 August, 1307. This would seem to have been done after Langeton's arrest and may have been an attempt to keep some of his lands from seizure. The other feasts of St Lawrence did not fall on Thursday in 1307.

^{page 192 note 1} 21 March, 1305.

^{page 193 note 1} 24 March, 1305.

^{page 194 note 1} The case was continued to Hilary, 1309, with no conclusion.

^{page 195 note 1} See pp. 761.

^{page 195 note 2} See pp. 284–90; K.R.Mem. 81, m. 35.

^{page 196 note 1} The case was continued from term to term until xv Michaelmas, 1310, when the record ends.

^{page 196 note 2} 3 July, 1308.

^{page 196 note 3} K.R.Mem. 77, m. 40. Execution of debt ceased 1312, when it was returned to Langeton. K.R.Mem. 85, m. 104.

^{page 197 note 1} Michaelmas term, 1306. K.R.Mem. 80, m. 57d.

^{page 197 note 2} Langeton was trying to collect the remainder in 1314. Exch. Plea Roll 36, m. 30.

^{page 197 note 3} 28 June, 1306. See p. 103.

^{page 198 note 1} 28 February, 1308.

^{page 204 note 1} There are no entries on this membrane.

^{page 204 note 2} Repetitions of this heading subsequently omitted.

^{page 204 note 3} C.C.R. 1288–1296, p. 380.Google Scholar

^{page 206 note 1} 23 February, 1305.

^{page 206 note 2} 2 May, 1305.

^{page 206 note 3} 24 February, 1305.

^{page 207 note 1} See p. 55.

^{page 208 note 1} C.C.R. 1288–1296, p. 412.Google Scholar

^{page 209 note 1} See pp. 37–39.

^{page 209 note 2} 28 May, 1306.

^{page 210 note 1} K.R.Mem. 80, m. 38d.

^{page 210 note 2} Langeton was trying to collect £22 10s. in 1314. Exch. Plea Roll 36, m. 30.

^{page 211 note 1} See p. 214.

^{page 214 note 1} The case was continued from term to term until xv Michaelmas, 1309, when the record ends.

^{page 214 note 2} 6 May, 1304. Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 215 note 1} An entry of the case to this point was vacated on m. 40d.

^{page 215 note 2} Pardon for John Hawkeshead, for counterfeiting Langeton's privy seal, 17 June, 1306. C.P.R. 1301–1307. p. 444.Google Scholar

^{page 216 note 1} C.P.R. 1307–1313, p. 144.Google Scholar

^{page 217 note 1} See p. 199.

^{page 219 note 1} The case was continued from term to term until xv Hilary, 1311, when the record ends.

^{page 219 note 2} See p. 198.

^{page 219 note 3} 6 March.

^{page 220 note 1} See p. 120.

^{page 222 note 1} The case was continued from term to term until xv Hilary, 1310, when the record ends.

^{page 222 note 2} Repetitions of this heading subsequently omitted.

^{page 222 note 3} See pp. 18–21.

^{page 223 note 1} 29 October, 1299. C.C.R. 1296–1302, p. 321.Google Scholar

^{page 223 note 2} See pp. 296–98.

^{page 224 note 1} 30 June, 1308.

^{page 225 note 1} 13 November, 1305.

^{page 225 note 2} 30 November, 1306. See also p. 39.

^{page 225 note 3} See p. 125.

^{page 225 note 4} 31 January, 1305.

^{page 226 note 1} 20 April, 1306.

^{page 228 note 1} 24 May or 23 August, 1296.

^{page 228 note 2} 14 March, 1297.

^{page 228 note 3} Assize Roll 612, m. 1 (21 September, 1305.)

^{page 229 note 1} See p. 52.

^{page 234 note 1} See p. 67.

^{page 234 note 2} See p. 66.

^{page 235 note 1} See p. 109.

^{page 236 note 1} 1 December, 1306.

^{page 236 note 2} Two subsequent similar headings, here omitted, have ‘anno quarto’, and ‘tercio’ is probably by mistake for ‘quarto’.

^{page 237 note 1} This recognizance does not seem to have been reported in Exch. Writs 3.

^{page 238 note 1} See pp. 124–25. This should be Castle Ashby.

^{page 239 note 1} See pp. 56–57.

^{page 241 note 1} The chancery warrant (82/2470) ordering a search of the holders of Langeton's lands that they may be returned to him, dated 11 January, 1312, is printed by Conway Davies, p. 571.

^{page 241 note 2} K.R.Mem. 85, mm. 17d, 48d (writs of 11 January and 23 January).