Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:11:34.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUAL GYPSY MOTH SEX PHEROMONE PRODUCTION BY SAMPLE CONCENTRATING GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Michael Ma  and
Michael E. Schnee
Michael Ma
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
Michael E. Schnee
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sample concentrating chromatography is a technique designed for trace analysis of organic compounds without the conventional concentration procedures such as nitrogen blowing or vacuum distillation. This method is uniquely suited for quantification of single insect pheromone production. Depending on temperature, gypsy moth females produced from 2.4 to 4.0 μg of sex pheromone (7,8-epoxy-2-methyloctadecane) per day.

Résumé

Il y a une méthode de chromatographie pour analyser les petites quantités de substances organiques sans utilizer des procédures ordinaires, par example, evaporation de dissolvant ou distillation à vide. Cette méthode est uniquement convenable pour le quantification de la production de pheromone d'un seul insecte. Dépendant de la température, les femelles de Lymantria dispar produisent de 2.4 μg à 4.0 μg pheromone sexuelle (7,8-epoxy-2-methyloctadecane) par jour.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 115 , Issue 3 , March 1983 , pp. 251 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bierl, B. A., Beroza, M., and Collier, C. W.. 1970. Potent sex attractant of the gypsy moth, Porthetria dispar (L): its isolation, identification and synthesis. Science 170: 87–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosert, W. H. and Wilson, E. O.. 1963. The analysis of olfactory communication among animals. J. theoret. Biol. 5: 443–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjostad, L. B., Gaston, L. K., and Shorey, H. H.. 1980. Temporal pattern of sex pheromone release by female Trichoplusia ni. J. Insect Physiol. 26: 493–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlton, R. E. and Cardé, R. T.. 1982. Rate and diel periodicity of pheromone emission from female gypsy moths (Lymantria dispar) determined with a glass-absorption collection system. J. Insect Physiol. 28: 423–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, J. H., Byler, R. C., Silverstein, R. M., Greenblatt, R. E., Gorman, J. E., and Burkholder, W. E.. 1977. Sex pheromone components and calling behavior of the female dermestid beetle, Trogoderma variabile Ballion (Coleoptera: Dermestidae). J. chem. Ecol. 3: 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, M., Hummel, H. E. and Burkholder, W. E.. 1980. Estimation of single furniture carpet beetle (Anthremus flavipes LeConte) sex pheromone release by dose-response curve and chromatographic analysis of pentaflurobenzyl derivative of (Z)-3-decenoic acid. J. chem. Ecol. 6: 597–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richerson, J. V. and Cameron, E. A.. 1974. Differences in pheromone release and sexual behavior between laboratory-reared and wild gypsy moth adults. Environ. Ent. 3: 475–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sower, L. L. and Fish, J. C.. 1975. Rate of release of the sex pheromone of the female Indian meal moth. Environ. Ent. 4: 168–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar