Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T09:05:42.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

APPARENT DDT TOLERANCE IN AN AQUATIC INSECT DISPROVED BY TEST

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. B. Sprague
J. B. Sprague
Affiliation:
Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Biological Station, St. Andrews, New Brunswick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Certain mayflies and stoneflies were present in a forest stream in New Brunswick after frequent yearly sprayings with DDT. Tests showed that a stonefly, Nemoura sp., apparently the most likely insect to have developed DDT tolerance, had not done so. Presence of mayflies and stoneflies in the stream was probably because they survived spraying while in the egg stage, or recovered quickly after spraying, or both.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 100 , Issue 3 , March 1968 , pp. 279 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, A. W. A. 1964. Animals in toxic environments: resistance of insects to insecticides. In Dill, et al. Handbook of Physiol., Sect. 4, Adapt. to the Env., American Physiol. Society, Washington, Chapter 48, pp. 773–793.Google Scholar
Brown, A. W. A., Armstrong, J. A., and Peterson, D. G.. 1954. Investigation of suspected resistance of mosquitoes to DDT in southern Ontario. Mosquito News 14(4): 192–194.Google Scholar
Elson, P. F. 1967. Effects on wild young salmon of spraying DDT over New Brunswick forests. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 24(4): 731–767.Google Scholar
Ferguson, D. E., Culley, D. D., and Cotton, W. D.. 1966 a. Tolerances of two populations of fresh water shrimp to five chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides. J. Miss. Acad. Sci. 11: 235–237.Google Scholar
Ferguson, D. E., Cotton, W. D., Gardner, D. T., and Culley, D. C.. 1966 b. Tolerances to five chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides in two species of fish from a transect of the lower Mississippi River. J. Miss. Acad. Sci. 11: 239–245.Google Scholar
Grant, C. D., and Brown, A. W. A.. 1967. Development of DDT resistance in certain mayflies in New Brunswick. Can. Ent. 99(10): 1040–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskins, W. M. 1960. Use of the dosage-mortality curve in quantitative estimation of insecticide resistance. Misc. Publs ent. Soc. Am. 2(1): 85–91.Google Scholar
Ide, F. P. 1967. Effects of forest spraying with DDT on aquatic insects of salmon streams in New Brunswick. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 24(4): 769–805.Google Scholar
Litchfield, J. T. Jr., 1949. A method for rapid graphic solution of time-per cent effect curves. J. Pharmac. exp. Ther. 97: 399–408.Google Scholar
Needham, J. G., Traver, J. R., and Hsu, Y.. 1935. The biology of mayflies. Comstock Publishing Co., Ithaca.Google Scholar
Randall, A. P. 1965. Evidence of DDT resistance in populations of spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), from DDT-sprayed areas of New Brunswick. Can. Ent. 97: 1281–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague, J. B. 1967. Negative test of apparent DDT-resistance in an aquatic insect after seven years' exposure to aerial spraying. Fish. Res. Bd Can. MS. Rep. Ser., No. 908.Google Scholar
Vinson, S. B., Boyd, C. E., and Ferguson, D. E.. 1963. Resistance to DDT in the mosquito fish, Gambusia affinis. Science 139: 217–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, F. E., and Macdonald, D. R.. 1958. Studies of aerial spraying against the spruce budworm in New Brunswick. X. Surveys of stream-bottom fauna in some sprayed and unsprayed streams, 1955–57. Canada, Dept. Agriculture, Forest Biology Lab., Fredericton, N.B. Interim Rep. 1957–3.Google Scholar
Webb, F. E., Macdonald, D. R., and Renault, T. R.. 1959. Studies of aerial spraying against the spruce budworm in New Brunswick. XII. Surveys of stream-bottom fauna in some sprayed and unsprayed streams, 1958. Canada, Dept. Agriculture, Forest Biology Lab., Fredericton, N.B. Interim Rep. 1958–4.Google Scholar