Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:27:11.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CLASSIFICATION OF THE BRACONID SUBFAMILY OPIINAE (HYMENOPTERA)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Robert A. Wharton
Robert A. Wharton
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA77843
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The tribal and subtribal structure of the braconid subfamily Opiinae is dismantled, and several changes in the generic classification are made. Thoracoplites Fischer and Aspilodemon Fischer are removed from the Opiinae. Utetes Foerster and Pseudorhinoplus Fischer are elevated to generic rank and Bracanastrepha Brèthes is treated as a subgenus of Utetes. Five generic names currently in use are treated as synonyms of Opius Wesmael, Rhinoplus Foerster is synonymized with Biosteres Foerster, and Kephalosema Fischer is synonymized with Hydrangeocola Brèthes. Relationships of species groups formerly included in the subtribe Biosterina are discussed in phylogenetic terms.

Résumé

La structure des tribus et sous-tribus de la sous-famille de braconides Opiinae est démantelée, et plusieurs changements dans la classification des genres sont faits. Thoracoplites Fischer et Aspilodemon Fischer sont retirés des Opiinés. Utetes Foerster et Pseudorhinoplus Fischer sont élevés au rang de genre et Bracanastrepha Brèthes est traité comme un sous-genre de Utetes. Cinq noms de genre d’usage courant sont traités comme synonymes de Opius Wesmael, Rhinoplus Foerster est mis en synonymie avec Biosteres Foerster, et Kephalosema Fischer est mis en synonymie Hydrangeocola Brèthes. Les relations entre les groupes d’espèces précédemment placées dans la sous-tribu des Biosterina sont discutées d’un point de vue phylogénétique.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 120 , Issue 4 , April 1988 , pp. 333 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belokobylskij, S.A. 1984. On the division of the tribe Exothecini s. 1. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in two with the description of a new genus and subgenus. Zool. Inst. U.S.S.R. Acad. Sci. 63: 1019–1026.Google Scholar
Buckingham, G.R. 1975. The parasites of walnut husk flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Rhagoletis) including comparative studies on the biology of Biosteres juglandis Mues. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and on the male tergal glands of Braconidae (Hymenoptera). Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of California, Berkeley. 282 pp.Google Scholar
Čapek, M. 1965. The classification of Braconidae in relation to host specificity. Proc. 12th Intern. Congr. Ent. (Lond.): 98–99.Google Scholar
Čapek, M. 1969. An attempt at a natural classification of the family Braconidae based on various unconventional characters (Hymenoptera). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 71: 304–312.Google Scholar
Čapek, M. 1970. A new classification of the Braconidae (Hymenoptera) based on the cephalic structures of the final instar larva and biological evidence. Can. Ent. 102: 846–875.Google Scholar
Dudarenko, G.P. 1974. Formation of the abdominal carapace in braconids (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) and some aspects of the classification of the family. Ent. Rev., Wash. 53 80–90.Google Scholar
Edson, K.M., and Vinson, S.B.. 1979. A comparative morphology of the venom apparatus of female braconids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Can. Ent. 111 1013–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, M. 1958. Die europäischen Arten der Gattung Opius Wesm. Teil la. Ann. Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat. Giacomo Doria 70 33–70.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. 1959. Die europäischen Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Acta ent. Mus. Nat. Prague 33 241–263.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. 1961 a. Ein neues Opiinen-Genus aus Afrika (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Ann. hist.-nat. Mus. Nat. Hung. 53 439–441.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. 1961 b. Zur Kenntnis der von Szépligeti beschriebenen Opiinae II. Teil (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Polskie Pismo Ent. 31 263–293.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. 1963 a. Die Opiinae der äthiopischen Region. Beitr. Ent. 13: 194–221, 662–747.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. 1963 b. Das Genus Austroopius Szépligeti (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Opiinae). Mitt. zool. Mus. Berlin 39 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, M. 1963 c. Über paläarktische Opiinae (Hym., Braconidae). Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien 66 283–305.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. 1965. Zwei neue Opiinen-Gattungen aus dem Kongo (1. Beitrag ueber die Opiinae des Musée Royal de l'Afrique Centrale) (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr. 71 309–323.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. 1966 a. Revision der indo-australischen Opiinae. Dr. W. Junk, B. V., The Hague. 167 pp.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. 1966 b. Aspilodemon, ein neues Opiinen-Genus aus Brasilien (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Entomophaga 11 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, M. 1967. Redeskriptionen von einigen Opiinen (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Arbeitsgem. oesterr. Ent. 19 59–69.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. 1968. Kephalosema, ein neues Hermiinen-Genus aus Chile (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Polskie Pismo Ent. 38 791–805.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. 1971. Hym. Braconidae. Index of World Opiinae. Index of entomophagous insects. Le Francois, Paris. 189 pp.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. 1972 a. Hymenoptera Braconidae (Opiinae I). Das Tierreich 91 1–620.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. 1972 b. Neue Afrikanische Opius-Arten der Untergattung Psyttalia Walker aus dem Musée Royal de l'Afrique Centrale in Tervuren und aus der Sammlung Townes in American Entomological Institute in Ann Arbor (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Opiinae) (Gleichzeitig 4. Beitrag Über die Opiinae des Musée Royal de l'Afrique Centrale in Tervuren). Redia 53 251–279.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. 1977. Hymenoptera Braconidae (Opiinae II – Amerika). Das Teirreich 96 1–1001.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. 1980. Neue Forschungsergebnisse in der Taxonomie neotropischer Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Polskie Pismo Ent. 50 215–269.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. 1984. Deskriptionen und Redeskriptionen von Opiinen (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) aus der paläarktischen Region. Ann. naturhist. Mus. Wien. 86 85–131.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. 1986. Neue Bestimmungsschlüssel für paläarktische Opiinae, neue Subgenera, Redeskriptionen und eine neue Art (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Ann. naturhist. Mus. Wien. 88/89 607–662.Google Scholar
Foerster, A. 1862. Synopsis der Familien und Gattungen der Braconen. Verh. naturh. Ver. preuss. Rheinl. 19 225–288.Google Scholar
Fullaway, D.T. 1951. Review of the Indo-Australasian parasites of the fruit flies (Tephritidae). Proc. Haw. ent. Soc. 14 243–250.Google Scholar
Gahan, A.B. 1915. A revision of the North American ichneumon-flies of the subfamily Opiinae. Proc. U.S. natl. Mus. 49 63–95.Google Scholar
Griffiths, G.C.D. 1964. The Alysiinae (Hym. Braconidae) parasites of the Agromyzidae (Diptera). I. General questions of taxonomy, biology and evolution. Beitr. Ent. 14 823–914.Google Scholar
Hedqvist, K.J. 1963. Notes on Hormiinae with description of new genera and species (Hym., Ichneumonoidea, Braconidae). Ent. Tidskr. 84 30–61.Google Scholar
Mason, W.R.M. 1986. Standard drawing conventions and definitions for venational and other features of wings of Hymenoptera. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 88 1–7.Google Scholar
Papp, J. 1981. Braconidae (Hymenoptera) from Korea. V. Acta zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 27 139–158.Google Scholar
Riegel, G.T. 1949. The wings of Braconidae (Hymenoptera). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 41 439–449.Google Scholar
Sharkey, M.J., and Mason, W.R.M.. 1986. The generic validity of Aenigmostomus and Asiacardiochiles (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 88 300–302.Google Scholar
Shaw, M.R. 1983. On evolution of endoparasitism: the biology of some genera of Rogadinae (Braconidae). Contrib. Am. ent. Inst. 20 307–328.Google Scholar
Shenefelt, R.D. 1975. Pars 12. Braconidae 8. Exothecinae Rogadinae. pp. 1115–1262in van der Vecht, J., and Shenefelt, R.D. (Eds.), Hymenopterorum Catalogus (nova editio). Dr. W. Junk B. V., The Hague.Google Scholar
Szépligeti, G. 1910. E. Jacobson'sche Hymenopteren aus Java und Krakatau. Braconiden und Ichneumoniden. II. Teil. Notes Leyden Mus. 32 85–104.Google Scholar
Thomson, C.G. 1895. L11. Bidrag till Braconidernas kännedom. Opusc. Ent. 20 2141–2339.Google Scholar
Tobias, V.I. 1967. A review of the classification, phylogeny and evolution of the family Braconidae (Hymenoptera). Ent. Rev., Wash. 46 387–399.Google Scholar
Tobias, V.I. 1976. New genus of braconids (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Opiinae) from the fauna of the USSR. Proc. zool. Inst. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 64 76–78.Google Scholar
Tobias, V.I. 1977 a. The genus Opius Wesm. (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) as parasites of fruit flies (Diptera, Tephritidae). Ent. Rev., Wash. 56 132–139.Google Scholar
Tobias, V.I. 1977 b. Wing venation of braconids (Hymenoptera, Braconidae), its taxonomic importance and evolution. Trudy Vses. ent. Obsh. 58 119–144.Google Scholar
Tobias, V.I., and Jakamavicius, A.. 1986. Braconidae, Opiinae. pp. 7–100 in Medvedev, G.S. (Ed.), Insect Fauna of the European Part of the USSR, Vol. 147, Section 3 (Hymenoptera), Part 5. Academia Nauk USSR, Leningrad. 308 pp.Google Scholar
van Achterberg, C. 1974. The features of the petiolar segment in some Braconidae (Hym.). Ent. Ber. 34 213–214.Google Scholar
van Achterberg, C. 1983 a. Revisionary notes on the subfamily Gnaptodontinae, with the decription of eleven new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Tijdschr. Ent. 126 25–57.Google Scholar
van Achterberg, C. 1983 b. Revisionary notes on the Palaearctic genera and species of the tribe Exothecini Foerster (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Zool. Meded. 57 339–355.Google Scholar
van Achterberg, C. 1983 c. A new species of Rhynchosteres Fischer from Zaire (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Zool. Meded. 57 91–95.Google Scholar
van Achterberg, C. 1984. Essay on the phylogeny of Braconidae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea). Ent. Tidskr. 105 41–58.Google Scholar
Wesmael, C. 1835. Monographie des Braconides de Belgique. Nouv. Mem. Acad. Sci. R. Bruxelles. 9 1–252.Google Scholar
Wharton, R.A. 1977 a. New World Aphaereta species (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Alysiinae), with discussion of terminology used in the Tribe Alysiini. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 70 782–803.Google Scholar
Wharton, R.A. 1977 b. Exodontiellini, a new tribe of Opiinae with exodont mandibles. Pan-Pac. Ent. 53 297–303.Google Scholar
Wharton, R.A. 1983. Variation in Opius hirtus Fischer and discussion of Desmiostoma Foerster (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 85 327–330.Google Scholar
Wharton, R.A. 1987. Changes in nomenclature and classification of some opiine Braconidae (Hymenoptera). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 89 61–73.Google Scholar
Wharton, R.A., and Gilstrap, F.E.. 1983. Key to and status of opiine braconid (Hymenoptera) parasitoids used in biological control of Ceratitis and Dacus s. 1. (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 76 721–742.Google Scholar
Wharton, R.A., and Marsh, P.M.. 1978. New World Opiinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) parasitic on Tephritidae (Diptera). J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 68 147–167.Google Scholar
Williams, H., Wong, M.A., Wharton, R.A., and Vinson, S.B.. 1988. Chemical and morphological characterization of Hagen's glands in four species of opiine Braconidae. J. chem. Ecol. In press.Google Scholar