Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:36:50.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Different Diets of a Host, Agria affinis (Fall.) (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), on the Development of a Parasitoid, Aphaereta pallipes (Say) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

H. L. House  and
J. S. Barlow
H. L. House
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute for Biological Control, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario
J. S. Barlow
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute for Biological Control, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Agria [= Pseudosarcophaga] affinis (Fall.) and Aphaereta pallipes (Say) make an excellent host-parasitoid couple for a determination of effects of host diet on a parasitoid. The anatomy, life history, and behaviour of these insects have been described (Salkeld, 1959; Coppel et al., 1959). Moreover, A. affinis can be reared axenically on chemically defined diets and it is readily attacked in the laboratory by A. pallipes, a parasitoid of the onion maggot, Hylemya antiqua (Meig.). This parasitoid deposits eggs into the body cavity of its host and these increase in size: the duration of the egg stage depends on the age of the host larva when parasitized (Salkeld, 1959).

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 93 , Issue 11 , November 1961 , pp. 1041 - 1044
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barlow, J. S., and House, H. L.. 1960. Effects of dietary glucose on haemolymph carbohydrates of Agria affinis (Fall.), J. Insect Physiol. 5: 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppel, H. C., House, H. L., and Maw, M. G.. 1959. Studies on dipterous parasites of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). VII. Agria affinis (Fall.) (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). Can. J. Zool. 37: 817–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, W. J., and Massey, F. J. Jr., 1957. Introduction to Statistical Analysis, p. 280, 2nd ed.McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. New York, N.Y.488 pp.Google Scholar
House, H. L. 1958. Nutritional requirements of insects associated with animal parasitism. Exptl. Parasitol. 7: 555–609.Google Scholar
House, H. L. 1961. Insect nutrition. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 6: 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, H. L., and Barlow, J. S.. 1956. Nutritional studies with Pseudosarcophaga affinis (Fall.), a dipterous parasite of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.). V. Effects of various concentrations of the amino acid mixture, dextrose, potassium ion, the salt mixture, and lard on growth and development; and a substitute for lard. Can. J. Zool. 34: 182–189.Google Scholar
House, H. L., and Barlow, J. S.. 1958. Vitamin requirements of the house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 51: 299–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leius, K. 1960. Attractiveness of different foods and flowers to the adults of some hymenopterous parasites. Can. Entomologist 92: 369–376.Google Scholar
Salkeld, E. H. 1959. Notes on anatomy, life-history, and behaviour of Aphaereta pallipes (Say) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasite of the onion maggot, Hylemya antiqua (Meig.). Can. Entomologist 91: 93–97.Google Scholar
Sapiro, V. A. 1956. The influence of the nutritional regimen of the host on the growth of certain insect parasites (in Russian). Zhur. Obshch. Biol. 17: 218–227. ([original not seen] re: Biol. Abt. 38778, 1958).Google Scholar
Smith, J. M. 1957. Effects of the food plant of California red scale, Aonidiella aurantii (Mask.) on reproduction of its hymenopterous parasites. Can. Entomologist 89: 219–230.Google Scholar
Von Brand, T. 1952. Chemical Physiology of Endoparasitic Animals pp. 215–55. Academic Press, Inc. New York, N.Y.339 pp.Google Scholar