Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:06:58.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE INFLUENCE OF LAND USE AND VEGETATION ON THE POPULATION DENSITY OF HYPHANTRIA CUNEA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. F. Morris
Affiliation:
Forest Research Laboratory, Canadian Forestry Service, Fredericton, New Brunswick

Abstract

The objects of this study were to determine whether the population density of Hyphantria cunea Drury is dependent on land use, vegetation pattern, and plant species; and to compare the extensive methods designed for this work with more intensive, single-plot designs.In two separate gradations, covering a period of 12 years, density was positively correlated with agricultural land use, open rather than closed patterns of vegetation, and the occurrence of only a few of the principal host species. The analysis showed how these variables affected density both within and between different climatic areas, and suggested how cultural methods might be used in population management.Extensive designs permit the development and testing of holistic models designed to explain both spatial and temporal differences in population density, and provide the replication required for the latter purpose. It is important to model spatial differences in density because such variables as vegetation pattern and composition are sometimes subject to cultural modification. Very intensive designs, based on sampling only a few trees at one point, do not permit the development of complete models and, because of plant host and dispersal phenomena affecting insects and their parasites, produce data that may be unreliable even for sub-models, such as those dealing with host–parasite interactions.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auer, C. 1968. Erste Ergebnisse einfacher stochastischer Modelluntersuchungen über Ursachen der Populationsbewegung des grauen Lärchenwicklers Zeiraphera diniana Gm. (= griseana Hb.) Oberengadin, 1949/66. Z. angew. Ent. 62: 202235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L. 1970. Timing of attack by Lypha dubia Fall. (Diptera: Tachinidae) on the winter moth Operophtera brumata (L.) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) as a factor affecting parasite success. J. Anim. Ecol. 39: 313320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovacevic, Z. 1954. Utjecaj hrane na bioticki potencijal dudovca Hyphantria cunea Drury. Biljne proizvodnje. 2: 6578.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F. (Ed.). 1963. The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1971. Observed and simulated changes in genetic quality in natural populations of Hyphantria cunea. Can. Ent. 103: 893906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. and Bennett, C. W.. 1967. Seasonal population trends and extensive census methods for Hyphantria cunea. Can. Ent. 99: 917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. and Fulton, W. C.. 1970. Models for the development and survival of Hyphantria cunea in relation to tempetature and humidity. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, P. W. Towards a holistic approach to insect population studies. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. (In press.)Google Scholar
Varley, G. C. and Gradwell, G. R.. 1970. Recent advances in insect population dynamics. A Rev. Ent. 15: 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar