Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T16:20:56.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Pales Weevil, Hylobius pales (Hbst.), in Southern Ontario1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. J. Finnegan
Affiliation:
Forest Insect Laboratory, Sault Ste. Marie, Ont., Canada

Extract

The pales weevil, Hylobius pales, was described in 1797 by Herbst (9), but it was not until 1916 that its importance in limiting the regeneration of white pine, Pinus strobus L., in cut-over areas was established by Carter (4). H e reported that up to 70 per cent of young reproduction trees might be killed by adults feeding on thc bark of young seedlings during the first two years following clear cutting of white pine. He concluded that it was unwise to plant white pine during the two seasons follouring cutting because seedlings in the vicinity of the stumps, in which the Weevil breeds. would be subjected to heavy feeding, and the resulting loss of trees would produce open areas in the planting. In 1921, Peirson (10) recorded in broad terms the seasonal history, distribution, host plants, habits,and control of the weevil, based primarily on a study of the insect in Massachusetts. More recently, Beal and McClintick (1), Bess (2), Savely (11), Sentell (12), and Wells (16) have emphasized the continued importance of the weevil as a forest pest and have recorded its presence in most of the United States east of the Mississippi and north of Florida, and in Canada from Nova Scotia to Manitoba. Friend and Chamberlin (8) and Ebel and Speers (5) have discussed population levels of the weevil in relation to cutting practices, and Speers (13, 14, 15) has discussed its control through the use of sprays and dips.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1)Beal, J. A., and McClintock, K. B.. 1943. The pales weevil in southern pines. J. Econ. Ent. 36: 792794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Bess, H. A. 1944. Insect attack and damage to white pine timber after the 1938 hurricane in New England. J. For. 42: 1416.Google Scholar
(3)Blatchley, W. S., and Leng, C. W.. 1916. Rhynchophora or weevils of northeastern America. Nature Publishing Co., Indianapolis, 682 pp.Google Scholar
(4)Carter, E. E. 1916. Hylobius pales as a factor in the reproduction of conifers in New England. Proc. Soc. Amer. Foresters. 2: 297307.Google Scholar
(5)Ebel, B. H., and Speers, C. F.. 1957. Population studies on the pales weevil (Hylobius pales). Proc. Assoc. South. Agr. Workers. 54: 153154.Google Scholar
(6)Finnegan, R. J. 1956. Weevils attacking pines in southern Ontario. Can. Dept. Agr. Div. For. Biol., Bi-monthly Prog. Rept. 12(2): 3.Google Scholar
(7)Finnegan, R. J. 1958. The pine weevil, Pissodes approximatus Hopk., in southern Ontario. Canad. Ent. 90: 348354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Friend, R. B., and Chamberlin, H. H.. 1942. Connecticut State Entomologist, forty-first report, 1941. Conn. Agric. Expt. Sta. Bull. 461: 463548.Google Scholar
(9)Herbst, J. F. W. 1797. Käfer 7: 31.Google Scholar
(10)Peirson, H. B. 1921. The life history and control of the pales weevil (Hylobius pales). Harvard Forest. Bull. 3. 33 p.Google Scholar
(11)Savely, H. E. 1939. Ecological relation of certain animals in dead pine and oak logs. Ecol. Monogr. 9: 322385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Sentell, N. W. 1949. Pales weevil damages plantations in Louisiana. J. For. 47: 741.Google Scholar
(13)Speers, C. F. 1956. Pales weevil controlled with insecticides: first year results. Southeast. For. Expt. Sta., Res. Note 96.Google Scholar
(14)Speers, C. F. 1957. Pales weevil controlled with sprays and dips. Assn. South. Agric. Workers, Proc. 129130.Google Scholar
(15)Speers, C. F. 1958. Pales weevil rapidly becoming serious pest of pine reproduction in the south. J. For. 56: 723726.Google Scholar
(16)Wells, A. B. 1926. Notes on Hylobius pales Boh. and Fissodes strobi Peck as nursery pests. J. Econ. Ent. 19: 412413.Google Scholar