Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:43:43.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

RESPONSE OF THE MOUNTAIN PINE BEETLE, DENDROCTONUS PONDEROSAE HOPKINS, TO ETHANOL IN A LABORATORY OLFACTOMETER1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

A. Syed
Affiliation:
Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1W5
K. Graham
Affiliation:
Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1W5

Extract

Graham (1968) demonstrated that logs became attractive to ambrosia beetles after the sapwood was subjected to anaerobic conditions. Pursuing this lead, Cade et al. (1970) and Moeck (1970a, 1970b, 1971) extracted, analyzed, and bioassayed anaerobic products from western hemlock and Douglas-fir trees and ascertained that ethanol was the principal “primary attractant” to the ambrosia beetles, Gnathotrichus sulcatus (LeConte) and Trypodendron lineatum (Olivier), respectively. The demonstration that ethanol enhanced the response of the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins, to its aggregation pheromones frontalin and seudenol (Pitrnan et al. 1975) suggested that ethanol could also be involved in the primary attraction of or host recognition by bark beetles. We report that the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, is arrested to ethanol in a laboratorv olfactometer.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, R.B., and Borden, J.H.. 1971. Flight arrestment of tethered Dendroctonus pseudotsugae and Trypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in response to olfactory stimuli. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 12731286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cade, S.C., Hrutfiord, B.F., and Gara, R.I.. 1970. Identification of a primary attractant for Gnathotrichus sulcatus isolated from western hemlock logs. J. econ. Ent. 63: 10141015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dethier, V.G., Browne, L.B., and Smith, C.N.. 1960. The designation of chemicals in terms of responses they elicit from insects. J. econ. Ent. 53: 134136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, K. 1959. Release by flight exercise of a chemotropic response from photopositive domination in a scolytid beetle. Nature 184: 282284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, K. 1962. Photic response in the ecology of the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum. Proc. 11th Int. Congr. Ent. (1960) 2: 226.Google Scholar
Graham, K. 1968. Anaerobic induction of primary chemical attractancy for ambrosia beetles. Can. J. Zool. 46: 905908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeck, H.A. 1970 a An olfactometer for the bioassay of attractants for scolytids. Can. Ent. 102: 792796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeck, H.A. 1970 b. Ethanol as the primary attractant for the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 102: 985995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeck, H.A. 1971. Field test of ethanol as a scolytid attractant. Can. Dep. Fish. For. Bi-Mon. Res. Notes 27(2): 1112.Google Scholar
Moeck, H.A. 1981. Ethanol induces attack on trees by spruce beetle Dendroctonus rufipennis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 113: 939942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitman, G.B., Hedden, R.L., and Gara, R.I.. 1975. Synergistic effects of ethyl alcohol on the aggregation of Dendroctonus pseudotsugae (Col., Scolytidae) in response to pheromones. Z. angew. Ent. 78: 203208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar