Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:37:56.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SEX RATIOS AT EMERGENCE OF TWO SPECIES OF HIGH-ARCTIC AEDES (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

H. V. Danks  and
Philip S. Corbet
H. V. Danks
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Ontario and Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario
Philip S. Corbet
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Ontario and Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sex ratios at emergence of Aedes impiger and A. nigripes in the Hazen Camp area (81°49′ N., 71°18′ W.), northern Ellesmere Island, N.W.T., are given from trap records, mainly for 1963.

There is a marked predominance of females in trap catches from temporary ponds, and an overall slight predominance of females (but with marked pond-to-pond variation) in permanent ponds. The nature of these inter-pond differences favours the inference that, before emergence, males normally survive less well than females, especially under the conditions existing in temporary ponds as they dry up.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 105 , Issue 4 , April 1973 , pp. 647 - 651
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbosa, P. and Peters, T. M.. 1970. The manifestations of overcrowding. Bull. ent. Soc. Am. 16: 89–93.Google Scholar
Barbosa, P., Peters, T. M., and Greenough, N. C.. 1972. Overcrowding of mosquito populations: responses of larval Aedes aegypti to stress. Environ. ent. 1: 89–93.Google Scholar
Brummer-Korvenkontio, M., Korhonen, P., and Hämeen-Anttila, R.. 1971. Ecology and phenology of mosquitoes (Dipt., Culicidae) inhabiting small ponds in Finland. Acta ent. Fenn. 28: 51–73.Google Scholar
Christophers, S. R. 1960. Aedes aegypti (L.). The yellow fever mosquito: its life history, bionomics and structure. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clements, A. N. 1963. The physiology of mosquitoes. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Corbet, P. S. 1962. A biology of dragonflies. Witherby, London.Google Scholar
Corbet, P. S. 1965. An insect emergence trap for quantitative studies in shallow ponds. Can. Ent. 97: 845–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbet, P. S. and Danks, H. V.. (In press.) Seasonal emergence and activity of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in a high-arctic locality. Can. Ent.Google Scholar
Craig, G. B., Vandehey, R. C., and Hickey, W. A.. 1961. Genetic variability in populations of Aëdes aegypti. Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 24: 527–539.Google Scholar
Curtis, L. C. 1953. Observations on mosquitoes at Whitehorse, Yukon Territory (Culicidae: Diptera). Can. Ent. 85: 353–370.Google Scholar
Das, M., Wattal, B. L., and Rhaghavan, N. G. S.. 1968. Spontaneous parthenogenesis in field populations of Culex pipiens fatigans. Bull. Indian Soc. malar. commun. Dis. 5: 102–104.Google Scholar
Haufe, W. O. and Burgess, L.. 1956. Development of Aedes (Diptera: Culicidae) at Fort Churchill, Manitoba, and prediction of dates of emergence. Ecology 37: 500–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, W. A. 1970. Factors influencing the distortion of sex ratio in Aedes aegypti. J. med. Ent. 7: 727–735.Google Scholar
Hocking, B., Richards, W. R., and Twinn, C. R.. 1950. Observations on the bionomics of some northern Aedes species. Can. J. Res. (D) 28: 58–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikeshoji, T. and Mulla, M. S.. 1970. Overcrowding factors of mosquito larvae. J. econ. Ent. 63: 90–96.Google Scholar
Martin, J. 1962. Interrelation of inversion systems in the midge Chironomus intercinctus (Diptera: Nematocera). Aust. J. biol. Sci. 15: 666–673.Google Scholar
Moore, C. G. and Fisher, B. R.. 1969. Competition in mosquitoes: density and species ratio effects on growth, mortality, fecundity and production of growth retardant. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 62: 1325–1331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliver, D. R. and Corbet, P. S.. 1966. Aquatic habitats in a high arctic locality: the Hazen Camp study area, Ellesmere Island, N.W.T. Def. Res. Bd Can., D. Phys. R (G), Hazen 26, 170 pp.Google Scholar
Oliver, D. R. and Danks, H. V.. 1972. Sex ratios of some high arctic Chironomidae (Diptera). Can. Ent. 104: 1413–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokoloff, A. 1955. Competition between sibling species of the pseudo obscura subgroup of Drosophila. Ecol. Monogr. 25: 387–409.Google Scholar
Surtees, G. 1959. Influence of larval population density on fluctuations in mosquito numbers. Nature, Lond. 183: 269–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wada, Y. 1965. Effect of larval density on the development of Aedes aegypti (L.) and the size of adults. Quaest. ent. 1: 223–249.Google Scholar
Young, C. J. 1922. Notes on the bionomics of Stegomyia calopus Meigen in Brazil. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 16: 389–407.Google Scholar