Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T12:52:40.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Spatial Distribution of Cocoons of Neodiprion swainei Middleton in a Jack Pine Stand: I. A Cartographic Analysis of Cocoon Distribution, With Special Reference to Predation by Small Mammals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. M. McLeod
J. M. McLeod
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry of Canada, Forest Research Laboratory, Sillery, Quebec
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Insight into the source of aggregation in the spatial distribution of cocoons of the Swaine jack-pine sawfly, Neodiprion swainei Middleton was gained by the use of special techniques enabling the sampling of units of forest floor in contiguous 2 × 2-inch square samples, as well as by randomized one-square-foot samples taken over a larger area. It was concluded that cocoon distribution is initially random but marked aggregation results from the subsequent transportation of cocoons into feeding stations by predacious small mammals, mostly of the genus Sorex. The feeding stations tended to be distributed near decaying stems and stumps on the forest floor, a factor which augmented the extent of aggregation. Of cocoons not preyed upon by small mammals, slightly higher counts were recorded directly under crown canopies as opposed to open areas, at a tree density of approximately 920 per acre.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 98 , Issue 4 , April 1966 , pp. 430 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barton, D. E., and David, F. N.. 1959. Contagious occupancy. J. R. statist. Soc. B, 21: 120–133.Google Scholar
Buckner, C. N. 1964. Metabolism, food capacity and feeding behaviour in four species of shrews. Canad. J. Zool. 42: 259–279.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A., and Yates, F.. 1957. Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research. Hafner Pub. Co., New York.Google Scholar
Greig-Smith, P. 1957. Quantitative plant ecology. Butterworth, Toronto.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1955. The selection by certain small mammals of dead, parasitized and healthy prepupae of the European pine sawfly, Neodiprion sertifer (Geoff.). Canad. J. Zool. 33: 404–419.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1959. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small mammal predation of the European spruce sawfly. Canad. Ent. 91: 293–320.Google Scholar
Ives, W. G. H., and Turnock, W. J.. 1959. Estimation of cocoon populations of the larch sawfly, Pristiphora erichsonii (Hartig). Canad. Ent. 91: 650–661.Google Scholar
Lyons, L. A. 1962. The effect of aggregation on egg and larval survival in Neodiprion swainei Midd. (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae). Canad. Ent. 94: 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prebble, M. L. 1943. Sampling methods in population studies of the European spruce sawfly Gilpinia bercyniae (Hartig) in Eastern Canada. Trans. roy. Soc. Can. 37: 93–126.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. 1958. Statistical methods. Iowa State College Press, Ames, Iowa. 534 pp.Google Scholar
Stark, W. R., and Dahlsten, D. L.. 1961. Distribution of cocoons of a Neodiprion sawfly under open-grown conditions. Canad. Ent. 93: 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripp, H. A. 1965. The development of Neodiprion swainei Middleton (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae) in the Province of Quebec. Canad. Ent. 97: 92–107.Google Scholar
Waters, W. E., and Henson, W. R.. 1959. Some sampling attributes of the negative binomial distribution with special reference to forest insects. For. Sci. 5: 397–412.Google Scholar