Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:20:57.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Systematics, distributions, and bionomics of the Neoeocatops gen. nov. and Nemadus of North America (Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae: Anemadini)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Stewart B. Peck  and
Joyce Cook
Stewart B. Peck*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6
Joyce Cook
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: stewart_peck@carleton.ca).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper completes a review and revision of the tribe Anemadini in North America, covering the subtribe Eocatopina (new for North America), with the genus Neoeocatopsgen. nov. containing one species, and the subtribe Nemadina, with the genus Nemadus Thomson containing 12 species. Species are forest inhabitants feeding on carrion and other decaying materials, may occur in caves, or are myrmecophiles occupying the nests of formicine ants, mostly of the genera Formica L. and Camponotus Mayr. The following new synonyms are recognized: N. ellipticus Jeannel, 1936 = N. horni Hatch, 1933 and N. obliquus Fall, 1937 = N. triangulum Jeannel, 1936. Lectotypes are designated for Catops brachyderus LeConte, 1863, Catopspusio LeConte, 1859, and Choleva decipiens Horn, 1880. New species are Nemadus browni Peck and Cook, sp. nov., N. criddlei Peck and Cook, sp. nov., and N. falli Peck and Cook, sp. nov.

Résumé

Ce travail complète une revue et une révision de la tribu Anemadini (Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae) d'Amérique du Nord; il traite de la sous-tribu Eocatopina (nouvelle pour l'Amérique du Nord) qui contient le genre Neoeocatopsgen. nov. avec une espèce et de la sous-tribu Nemadina qui comprend le genre Nemadus Thomson, 1867 avec 12 espèces. Ces espèces vivent dans les forêts et se nourrissent de charogne et d'autres matériaux en décomposition; elles peuvent aussi se retrouver dans les cavernes ou alors être des myrmécophiles vivant dans les nids de fourmis formicinées, surtout des genres Formica L. et Camponotus Mayr. Nous établissons les nouvelles synonymies suivantes: N. ellipticus Jeannel, 1936 = N. horni Hatch, 1933 et N. obliquus Fall = N. triangulum Jeannel, 1936. Nous désignons des lectotypes pour Catops brachyderus LeConte, 1863, Catops pusio LeConte, 1859 et Choleva decipiens Horn, 1880. Les nouvelles espèces sont Nemadus browni Peck et Cook, sp. nov., N. criddlei Peck et Cook, sp. nov. et N. falli Peck et Cook, sp. nov.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 139 , Issue 1 , February 2007 , pp. 87 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnett, R.H. Jr., Samuelson, G.A., Heppner, J.B., Nishida, G.M., Watt, J.C., and Woodruff, R.E. 1997. The insect and spider collections of the world. 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
Blatchley, W.S. 1910. An illustrated descriptive catalogue of the Coleoptera or beetles (exclusive of Rynchophora) known to occur in Indiana. Indiana Department of Geological Natural Resources Bulletin, 1.Google Scholar
Bolton, B. 1995. A new general catalogue of the ants of the world. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Chandler, D.S., and Peck, S.B. 1992. Diversity and seasonality of leiodid beetles (Coleoptera: Leiodidae) in an old-growth and a 40-year-old forest in New Hampshire. Environmental Entomology, 21: 1238–1293.Google Scholar
Cody, W.J., Savile, D.B.O., and Sarazin, M.J. 1986. Systematics in Agriculture Canada at Ottawa 1886–1986. Biosystematics Research Center, Agriculture Canada, Historical Series No. 28.Google Scholar
Creighton, W.S. 1950. The ants of North America. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology (Harvard), 104: 1–585, 57 pl.Google Scholar
Criddle, A. 1973. Criddle-de-diddle-ensis. Privately published, Winnipeg, Manitoba.Google Scholar
Darlington, P.J. Jr., 1940. Henry Clinton Fall (1862–1939). Psyche, 47: 45–54.Google Scholar
Fall, H.C. 1937. The North American species of Nemadus Thom., with descriptions of new species (Coleoptera, Silphidae). Journal of the New York Entomological Society, 45: 335–340.Google Scholar
Giachino, P.M., Vailati, D., and Casale, A. 1998. Major questions in the phylogeny and bio-geography of Cholevidae (Coleoptera), with emphasis on the subfamily Leptodirinae. In Proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Entomology: Phylogeny and Evolution of Subterranean and Endogean Cholevidae (=Leiodidae Cholevinae), Firenze, Italy, 30 August 1996. Edited by Giachino, P.M. and Peck, S.B.. Atti del Museo regionale di Scienze naturali, Torino, Italy. pp. 179–210.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. 1888. Catalogue of the myrmecophilous Coleoptera with bibliogaphy and notes. The Canadian Entomologist, 20: 161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatch, M.H. 1928. Coleopterorum Catalogus. Silphidae II. Pars 95. W. Junk, Berlin.Google Scholar
Hatch, M.H. 1933. Studies on the Leptodiridae (Catopidae) with descriptions of new species. Journal of the New York Entomological Society, 41: 187–239.Google Scholar
Hatch, M.H. 1957. The beetles of the Pacific North-west. Part II: Staphyliniformia. University of Washington Publications in Biology, 16.ix + 384 p.Google Scholar
Hedlund, K.S. 2003. Online catalog of the ants of North America. Available from http://www.cs.unc.edu/~hedlund/ants/catalog [cited 13 October 2005].Google Scholar
Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E.O. 1990. The ants. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, G.H. 1880. Synopsis of the Silphidae of the United States with reference to the genera of other countries. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 8: 219–322.Google Scholar
Jeannel, R. 1922. Silphidae Catopinae (Coléoptères) (deuxième série) avec une étude phylogénique et paléogéographique de la sous-famille. Archives de Zoologie Experimentale et Generale, 16: 1–98.Google Scholar
Jeannel, R. 1936. Monographie des Catopidae. Mémoires du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (n.s.), 1: 1–433.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1853. Synopsis of the Silphales of America, north of Mexico. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 6: 274–287.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1859. Additions to the coleopterous fauna of northern California and Oregon. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 11: 281–292.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1863. New species of North American Coleoptera. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 167: 1–92.Google Scholar
Mannerheim, C.G. 1843. Mémoire sur le récolte d'insectes coléoptères, faite en 1842. Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou, 16(1): 70–87.Google Scholar
Märkel, J.C.F. 1841. Beiträge zur Kennntnis der unter Ameisen lebenden Insekten. Edited by Germar, E.F.. Zeitschrift fur die Entomologie, 3: 203–225.Google Scholar
Matthews, J.V. Jr., 1979. Tertiary and quaternary environments: historical background for an analysis of the Canadian insect fauna. In Canada and its insect fauna. Edited by Danks, H.V.. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 108: 31–86.Google Scholar
Murray, A. 1856. Monograph of the genus Catops. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 18(2): 457–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, A.F. Jr., 1998. Phylogenetic problems, current classification and generic catalog of world Leiodidae (including Cholevidae). In Proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Entomology: Phylogeny and Evolution of Subterranean and Endogean Cholevidae (=Leiodidae Cholevinae), Firenze, Italy, 30 August 1996. Edited by Giachino, P.M. and Peck, S.B.. Atti del Museo regionale di Scienze naturali, Torino, Italy. pp. 41–178.Google Scholar
Park, O. 1929. Ecological observations upon the myrmecocoles of Formica ulkei Emery, especially Leptinus testaceus Mueller. Psyche, 36: 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, O. 1935. Beetles associated with the mound building ant, Formica ulkei Emery. Psyche, 42: 216–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, S.B. 1973. A systematic revision and the evolutionary biology of the Ptomaphagus (Adelops) beetles of North America (Coleoptera; Leiodidae; Catopinae), with emphasis on cave-inhabiting species. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 145(2): 29–162.Google Scholar
Peck, S.B. 1977. The subterranean and epigean Catopinae of Mexico (Coleoptera: Leiodae). Association of Mexican Cave Studies Bulletin, 6: 185–213.Google Scholar
Peck, S.B. 1999. A review of the Dissochaetus (Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae) of the United States and Canada. The Canadian Entomologist, 131: 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, S.B. 2000. Leiodidae Fleming, 1821. In American beetles. Vol. 1. Edited by Arnett, R.H. Jr., and Thomas, M.C.. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. pp. 250–258.Google Scholar
Peck, S.B., and Anderson, R.S. 1985. Seasonal activity and habitat associations of adult small carrion beetles in southern Ontario (Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 39: 347–353.Google Scholar
Peck, S.B., and Cook, J. 1992. Use of “car nets” to sample flying micro-Coleoptera. The Canadian Entomologist, 124: 745–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, S.B., and Cook, J. 2002. Systematics, distributions, and bionomics of the small carrion beetles (Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae: Cholevini) of North America. The Canadian Entomologist, 134: 723–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, S.B., and Davies, A. 1980. Collecting small beetles with large-area “window” traps. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 34: 237–238.Google Scholar
Peck, S.B., and Gnaspini, P. 1997. Review of the myrmecophilous Ptomaphagus, subgenus Echinocoleus (new status), of North America (Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae: Ptomaphagini). The Canadian Entomologist, 129: 93–104.Google Scholar
Peck, S.B., and Skelley, P.E. 2001. Small carrion beetles (Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae) from burrows of Geomys and Thomomys pocket gophers (Rodentia: Geomyidae) in the United States. Insecta Mundi, 15: 139–149.Google Scholar
Perkovsky, Y.E. 1994. New Cholevinae beetle taxa (Coleoptera, Leiodidae, Cholevinae) from central Asia and far east. Vestnik Zoologii, 1994(4–5): 13–16.Google Scholar
Perreau, M. 2000. Catalogue des Coléoptères Leiodidae Cholevinae et Platypsyllinae. Mémoires de la Société Entomologique de France No. 4.Google Scholar
Reitter, E. 1885 [1884]. Bestimmungs-Tabellen der europäischen Coleopteren. XII. Necrophaga (Platypsyllidae, Leptinidae, Silphidae, Anisotomidae und Clambidae). Verhandlungen des Naturforschenden Vereines in Brtinn, 23: 3–122.Google Scholar
Roughley, R.E. 2000. Aweme, Manitoba — an important historical grasslands site. Newsletter, Arthropods of Canadian Grasslands, 6: 6–132.Google Scholar
Salgado, J.M. 1999. The Leiodidae (Coleoptera) of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History. New data and description of two new species. Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 75: 35–47.Google Scholar
Sanders, C.J. 1964. The biology of carpenter ants in New Brunswick. The Canadian Entomologist, 96: 894–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, E.A. 1889. Myrmecophilous Coleoptera found in temperate North America. Journal of the Entomological Society of Washington, 1: 237–246.Google Scholar
Shubeck, P.P., Downie, N.M., Wenzel, R.L., and Peck, S.B. 1977. Species composition of carrion beetles in a mixed-oak forest. William L. Hutcheson Memorial Forest Bulletin, 4: 12–17.Google Scholar
Smith, D.R. 1979. Superfamily Formicoidea. In Catalogue of Hymenoptera in America north of Mexico. Vol. 1. Edited by Krombein, K.V, Hurd, P.D. Jr., Smith, D.R., and Burks, B.D.. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. pp. 1323–1467.Google Scholar
Walsh, G.B. 1991. Beetles associated with ants and ant nests. Revised by J. Cooter. In A Coleopterist's Handbook. 3rd ed. Edited by Cooter, J.. The Amateur Entomologists' Society. Grosvenor Press, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. pp. 210–216.Google Scholar
Walters, R.D., and Roth, V.D. 1950. Faunal nest study of the woodrat Neotoma fuscipes monochroura Rhoads. Journal of Mammalogy, 31: 290–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasmann, E. 1894. Kritisches Verzeichniss der myrmecophilen und termitophilen Arthropoden. Felix Dames, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wheeler, T.A. 2005. Long term research: Norman Criddle, John Merton Aldrich and the grass flies of Aweme. Newsletter, Arthropods of Canadian Grasslands, 11: 5–13.Google Scholar
Wickham, H.F. 1892. Notes on some myrmecophilous Coleoptera. Psyche, 6: 321–323.Google Scholar
Wickham, H.F. 1896. On Coleoptera found with ants. 3rd paper. Psyche, 7: 370–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickham, H.F. 1900. On Coleoptera found with ants. 5th paper. Psyche, 9: 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar