Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:01:46.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A TAXONOMIC STUDY OF THE GENUS TEGRODERA (COLEOPTERA: MELOIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

John D. Pinto
John D. Pinto
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three allopatric species are recognized in the North American genus Tegrodera LeConte. Speciation was probably a relatively recent event in this genus as all species are closely related, and separable by minor but consistent differences of adult anatomy. The most distinctive species, T. aloga Skinner, ranges throughout much of the Sonoran Desert in western Arizona and northwestern Sonora. T. erosa LeConte, a species occurring in southern California and Baja California, is separated geographically from T. aloga by the arid Colorado Desert. T. erosa consists of two distinct subspecies, the nominate form occurring in southern California, and T. e. inornata Blaisdell distributed throughout much of Baja California. T. latecincta Horn, a species found in the Owens and Antelope valleys of California, is the closest relative of T. erosa. It is separated from the latter by the San Gabriel and San Bernardino mountains, and from T. aloga by the vast Mojave Desert. The species of Tegrodera are each associated with different plant communities, though the genus Eriastrum seems to be an important food source for all adults. The taxonomic analysis presented herein includes the study of both intra- and interspecific variation. The first instar larva of T. aloga and T. e. erosa are compared, and notes on seasonal distribution, habitat, and non-sexual behavior are included.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 107 , Issue 1 , January 1975 , pp. 45 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amadon, D. 1949. The seventy-five per cent rule for subspecies. Condor 51: 250–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnett, R. H. Jr., 1963. The beetles of the United States (a manual for identification). Washington.Google Scholar
Axelrod, D. I. 1950. Evolution of desert vegetation in western North America. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. 590, pp. 215–360.Google Scholar
Beauregard, H. 1890. Les Insectes Vesicants. Paris.Google Scholar
Blaisdell, F. E. 1918. Synopsis of genus Tegrodera (Coleoptera: Meloidae). Can. Ent. 50: 333–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cott, H. B. 1957. Adaptive coloration in animals. London.Google Scholar
Denier, P. C. L. 1935. Coleopterorum Americanorum Familiae Meloidarum. Enumeratio Synonymica. Revta Soc. ent. Argent. 7: 139–176.Google Scholar
Dillon, L. S. 1952. The Meloidae (Coleoptera) of Texas. Am. Midl. Nat. 48: 330–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, E. H. 1973. First-stage larvae of Tegrodera erosa aloga and Gnathium obscurum (Coleoptera: Meloidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 66: 785–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essig, E. O. 1926. Insects of western North America. New York.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. P. 1965. The digestive and reproductive systems of the Meloidae (Coleoptera) and their significance in the classification of the family. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 58: 442–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, A. P. 1971. External genitalia of Meloidae (Coleoptera). II. The genitalia and their taxonomic significance. Misc. Publs ent. Soc. Am. 8: 1–29.Google Scholar
Horn, G. H. 1891. New species and miscellaneous notes. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 18: 32–47.Google Scholar
Hubbard, H. G. 1901. Habits of Phodaga alticeps LeC. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 4: 186–187.Google Scholar
Jahns, R. H. 1954. Investigations and problems of southern California geology. Calif. Div. Mines Bull. 170, pp. 5–29.Google Scholar
Kaszab, Z. 1959. Phylogenetische Beziehungen des Flugelgeaders der Meloiden (Coleoptera), nebst, Beschreibung neuer Gottungen und Arten. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 5: 67–114.Google Scholar
Kaszab, Z. 1969. The system of the Meloidae (Coleoptera). Memorie Soc. ent. ital. 48: 241–248.Google Scholar
Lebert, C. D. 1931. Arizona insect pest report of 1929–1930. 21st–22nd Rep. Ariz. Comm. Agric. Hort. 1929–1931, pp. 54–64.Google Scholar
LeConte, J. L. 1851. Descriptions of new species of Coleoptera from California. Ann. Lyceum nat. Hist. N.Y. 5: 125–216.Google Scholar
LeConte, J. L. 1853. Synopsis of the Meloidae of the United States. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 6: 328–350.Google Scholar
LeConte, J. L. 1862. Classification of the Coleoptera of North America. Smithson. misc. Collns No. 136, pp. 209–286.Google Scholar
LeConte, J. L. and Horn, G. H.. 1883. Classification of the Coleoptera of North America. Smithson. misc. Collns No. 507, pp. 1–567.Google Scholar
MacSwain, J. W. 1956. A classification of the first instar larvae of the Meloidae (Coleoptera). Univ. Calif. Publs Ent., Vol. 12, pp. 1–182.Google Scholar
Martin, P. S. and Mehringer, P. J.. 1965. Pleistocene pollen analysis and biogeography of the Southwest. In Wright, H. E. Jr. and Frey, D. G., The quaternary of the United States. Princeton.Google Scholar
Mason, H. L. 1945. The genus Eriastrum and the influence of Bentham and Gray upon the problems of generic confusion in Polemoniaceae. Madronõ 8: 65–91.Google Scholar
Morrill, A. W. 1914. Sixth annual report of the year ending June 30, 1914. Ariz. Comm. Agric. Hort. 47 pp.Google Scholar
Papp, C. S. 1960. Distributional records on some North American beetles with remarks on their ecology in southern California, (Notes on North American Coleoptera, No. 87). Ent. News 71: 69–77.Google Scholar
Pinto, J. D. 1972. A synopsis of the bionomics of Phodaga alticeps (Coleoptera: Meloidae) with special reference to sexual behavior. Can. Ent. 104: 577–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selander, R. B. 1958. Melanism in some Meloidae (Coleoptera) from the Pinacate lava cap in Northwestern Sonora, Mexico. Trans. Kans. Acad. Sci. 61: 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selander, R. B. and Mathieu, J. M.. 1969. Ecology, behavior, and adult anatomy of the Albida Group of the genus Epicauta (Coleoptera, Meloidae). Univ. Ill. biol. Monogr. 41.Google Scholar
Shreve, F. and Wiggens, I. L.. 1964. Vegetation and flora of the Sonoran Desert. Vol. 1. Stanford.Google Scholar
Skinner, H. 1903. A new variety of Tegrodera (Coleoptera). Ent. News 14: 168.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, E. C. 1928. A reclassification of the genera of North American Meloidae (Coleoptera) and a revision of the genera and species formerly placed in the tribe Meloini, found in America north of Mexico, together with descriptions of new species. Univ. Calif. Publs Ent., Vol. 4, pp. 395–474.Google Scholar
Varley, G. C. 1939. The frightening attitude of two California meloid beetles Phodaga alticeps LeC. and Tegrodera erosa LeC. Proc. ent. Soc. Lond. (A): 14: 101–102.Google Scholar
Wellman, C. 1910. On the classification of the Lyttidae (Meloidae S. Cantharidae auctt.). Ent. News 21: 211–222.Google Scholar
Wells, P. V. and Berger, R.. 1967. Late Pleistocene history of coniferous woodland in the Mohave Desert. Science 155: 1640–1647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werner, F. G., Enns, W. R., and Parker, F. H.. 1966. The Meloidae of Arizona. Tech. Bull. agric. Exp. Stn Univ. Ariz., No. 175.Google Scholar