Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:30:20.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Larval phenologies and parasitoids of two seed-feeding weevils associated with hoary cress and shepherd's purse (Brassicaceae) in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2012

Franck J. Muller ,
Lloyd M. Dosdall ,
Peter G. Mason  and
Ulrich Kuhlmann
Franck J. Muller
Affiliation:
CABI Europe-Switzerland, Rue des Grillons 1, 2800 Delémont, Switzerland
Lloyd M. Dosdall*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, 4-10 Agriculture-Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2P5
Peter G. Mason
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Centre, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
Ulrich Kuhlmann
Affiliation:
CABI Europe-Switzerland, Rue des Grillons 1, 2800 Delémont, Switzerland
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: Lloyd.Dosdall@ales.ualberta.ca).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Europe, Ceutorhynchus turbatus Schultze and Ceutorhynchus typhae (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) feed on seeds from hoary cress and shepherd's purse (Cardaria draba (L.) Desv. and Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.); both plants are invasive in North America. In North America, C. turbatus is a candidate for biological control of hoary cress, C. typhae is adventive, and both are sympatric with cabbage seedpod weevil (Ceutorhynchus obstrictus (Marsham)), an invasive alien pest of canola (Brassica napus L. and Brassica rapa L., Brassicaceae). We investigated host associations among C. turbatus, C. typhae, and their parasitoids in Europe. Of particular interest was host specificity of Trichomalus perfectus (Walker) and Mesopolobus morys (Walker) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), candidates for biological control of C. obstrictus in North America. We found no evidence that T. perfectus attacks C. turbatus or C. typhae; however, M. morys was the most common parasitoid associated with C. turbatus.

Résumé

En Europe, Ceutorhynchus turbatus Schultze et Ceutorhynchus typhae (Herbst) (Coleoptera : Curculionidae) se nourrissent des graines de la cardaire drave et de la capselle bourse-à-pasteur (Cardaria draba (L.) Desv. et Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.), deux plantes envahissantes en Amérique du Nord. En Amérique du Nord, C. turbatus est un candidat pour la lutte biologique contre la cardaire drave, C. typhae est adventice et les deux espèces sont sympatriques avec le charançon de la graine du chou (Ceutorhynchus obstrictus (Marsham)), un ravageur exotique envahissant du colza (Brassica napus L. et Brassica rapa L., Brassicaceae). Nous avons étudié les associations d'hôtes entre C. turbatus, C. typhae et leurs parasitoïdes en Europe. La spécificité d'hôte de Trichomalus perfectus (Walker) et celle de Mesopolobus morys (Walker) (Hymenoptera : Pteromalidae) sont particulièrement intéressantes et ces espèces sont des candidats pour la lutte biologique contre C. obstrictus en Amérique du Nord. Nous n'avons aucune indication que T. perfectus attaque C. turbatus ou C. typhae; cependant, M. morys est le parasitoïde le plus communément associé à C. turbatus.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Biodiversity & Evolution
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 143 , Issue 4 , August 2011 , pp. 399 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 2011. Whitetop/hoary cress Cardaria draba (L.) Desv. [online]. Available from http://parks.state.co.us/SiteCollectionImages/parks/Programs/ParksResourceStewardship/Whitetop.pdf [accessed 21 March 2011].Google Scholar
Babendreier, D.Bigler, F.Kuhlmann, U. 2005. Methods used to assess non-target effects of invertebrate biological control agents of arthropod pests. BioControl, 50: 821–870. doi:10.1007/s10526-005-3633-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baur, H.Muller, F.J.Gibson, G.A.P.Mason, P.G.Kuhlmann, U. 2007. A review of the species of Mesopolobus (Chalcidoidea: Pteromalidae) associated with Ceutorhynchus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) host-species of European origin. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 97: 387–397. doi:10.1017/S0007485307005032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonnemaison, L. 1957. Le charançon des siliques (Ceutorhynchus assimilis Payk.) Biologie et Méthodes de lutte. Annales de l'institut national de la recherche agronomique-Serie C: Annales des Epiphyties, 8: 387–542.Google Scholar
Bouchard, P.Lesage, L.Goulet, H.Bostanian, N.J.Vincent, C.Zmudzinska, A.Lasnier, J. 2005. Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea) diversity and abundance in two Québec vineyards. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 98: 565–574. doi:10.1603/0013-8746(2005)098[0565:WCCDAA]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bousquet, Y. 1991. Checklist of beetles of Canada and Alaska. Agriculture Canada Publication, 1861/E.Google Scholar
Budd, A.C.Best, K.F. 1969. Wild plants of the Canadian prairies. Canada Department of Agriculture Research Branch Publication, 983.Google Scholar
Cárcamo, H.A.Dosdall, L.M.Johnson, D.Olfert, O. 2005. Evaluation of foliar and seed treatments for control of the cabbage seedpod weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in canola. The Canadian Entomologist, 137: 476–487. doi:10.4039/n04-081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cripps, M.G.Hinz, H.L.McKenney, J.L.Harmon, B.L.Merickel, F.W.Schwarzlaender, M. 2006. Comparative survey of the phytophagous arthropod faunas associated with Lepidium draba in Europe and the western United States, and the potential for biological weed control. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 16: 1007–1030. doi:10.1080/09583150600828361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defelice, M.S. 2001. Shepherd's purse, Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medic. Weed Technology, 15: 892–895. doi:10.1614/0890-037X(2001)015[0892:SSPCBP]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dmoch, J. 1975. Study on the parasites of the cabbage seedpod weevil (Ceutorhynchus assimilis Payk.). I. Species composition and economic importance of the larval ectoparasites. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych, 5: 99–112.Google Scholar
Dosdall, L.M.Moisey, D.W.A. 2004. Developmental biology of the cabbage seedpod weevil, Ceutorhynchus obstrictus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in spring canola, Brassica napus, in western Canada. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 97: 458–465. doi:10.1603/0013-8746(2004)097[0458:DBOTCS]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosdall, L.M.Moisey, D.Cárcamo, H.A.Dunn, R. 2001. Cabbage seedpod weevil fact sheet. Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development Agdex, 622–621: 1–4.Google Scholar
Dosdall, L.M.Gibson, G.A.P.Olfert, O.Mason, P.G. 2009. Responses of Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera) parasitoids to invasion of the cabbage seedpod weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in western Canada. Biological Invasions, 11: 109–125. doi:10.1007/s10530-008-9323-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, A.S.Dosdall, L. 2003. Reproductive biology of Ceutorhynchus obstrictus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on wild and cultivated Brassicaceae in southern Alberta. Journal of Entomological Science, 38: 533–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freese, G. 1995. Structural refuges in two stem-boring weevils on Rumex crispus. Ecological Entomology, 20: 351–358. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.1995.tb00467.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gassmann, A.Hinz, H.L.de Meij, A.Heinlein, G.Spiewak, E.Yaworski, K. 2001. Whitetop or hoary cress (Cardaria spp.). CABI Bioscience Switzerland Centre, Weed Biological Control Quarterly Report. pp. 25–27.Google Scholar
Gillespie, D.R.Mason, P.G.Dosdall, L.Bouchard, P.Gibson, G.A.P. 2006. Importance of long-term research in classical biological control: An analytical review of a release against the cabbage seedpod weevil in North America. Journal of Applied Entomology, 130: 401–409. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.2006.01085.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herting, B. 1973. Coleoptera to Strepsiptera. Section A. Host or prey/enemy. In A catalogue of parasites and predators of terrestrial arthropods. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux. Institute of Biological Control, Farnham Royal, Slough, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Howarth, F.G. 1991. Environmental impacts of classical biological control. Annual Review of Entomology, 36: 485–509. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.002413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iannetta, P.P.M.Begg, G.Hawes, C.Young, M.Russell, J.Squire, G.R. 2007. Variation in Capsella (shepherd's purse): An example of intraspecific functional diversity. Physiologia Plantarum, 129: 542–554. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00833.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhlmann, U.Dosdall, L.M.Mason, P.G. 2002. Ceutorhynchus obstrictus (Marsham), cabbage seedpod weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). In Biological control programmes in Canada, 1981–2000. Edited by Mason, P.G.Huber, J.T.. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, United Kingdom. pp. 52–58.Google Scholar
Kuhlmann, U.Mason, P.G.Hinz, H.L.Blossey, B.De Clerck-Floate, R.A.Dosdall, L. 2006. Avoiding conflicts between insect and weed biological control: selection of non-target species to assess host specificity of cabbage seedpod weevil parasitoids. Journal of Applied Entomology, 130: 129–141. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.2006.01040.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larina, S.Y. 2003 Cardaria draba (L.) Desv. -Heart-podded hoary cress [online]. Available from http://www.agroatlas.ru/en/content/weeds/Cardaria_draba/ [accessed 4 April 2011].Google Scholar
Lefol, E.Danielou, V.Darmency, H. 1996. Predicting hybridization between transgenic oilseed rape and wild mustard. Field Crops Research, 45: 153–161. doi:10.1016/0378-4290(95)00067-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louda, S.M.Pemberton, R.W.Johnson, M.T.Follett, P.A. 2003. Nontarget effects: The Achilles' heel of biological control? Retrospective analyses to reduce risk associated with biocontrol introductions. Annual Review of Entomology, 48: 365–396. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.48.060402.102800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moss, E.H. 1959. Flora of Alberta. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
Muller, F.J. 2006 Ensuring the safety of classical biological control for cabbage seedpod weevil in Canada: assessment of the ecological host range of candidate ectoparasitoids in Europe and clarification of their taxonomic status. Ph.D. thesis, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.Google Scholar
Muller, F.J.Baur, H.Gibson, G.A.P.Mason, P.G.Kuhlmann, U. 2007. Review of the species of Trichomalus (Chalcidoidea: Pteromalidae) associated with Ceutorhynchus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) host species of European origin. The Canadian Entomologist, 139: 643–657. doi:10.4039/n06-059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulligan, G.A.Findlay, J.N. 1974. The biology of Canadian weeds. 3. Cardaria draba, C. chalepensis, and C. pubescens. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 54: 149–160. doi:10.4141/cjps74-024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzlaender, M.McKenney, J.Cripps, M. 2002. Biocontrol pre-release studies on hoary cress in Idaho, adjacent states, and central Europe. Progress Report, Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho Moscow, ID 83844–2339, United States of America.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. 2005. The politics of assessing risk for biological invasions: The USA as a case study. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20: 216–222. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simberloff, D.Stiling, P. 1996. How risky is biological control? Ecology, 77: 1965–1974. doi:10.2307/2265693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiling, P. 2004. Biological control not on target. Biological Invasions, 6: 151–159. doi:10.1023/B:BINV.0000022130.54793.b7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiling, P.Simberloff, D. 2000. The frequency and strength of nontarget effects of invertebrate biological control agents of plant pests and weeds. In Nontarget effects of biological control. Edited by Follet, P.A.Duan., J.J.. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, United States of America. pp. 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, P. 2002. Canola growers' manual [online]. Available from http://www.canolacouncil.org/canola_growers_manual.aspx [accessed 4 April 2011].Google Scholar
Thomas, M.B.Willis, A.J. 1998. Biocontrol–risky but necessary? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13: 325–329. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01417-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, W.R. 1955. Section 2: Host parasite catalogue, Part 3: Hosts of the Hymenoptera (Calliceratid to Evaniid). In A catalogue of the parasites and predators of insect pests. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux. The Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
Vidal, S. 1997. Determination list of entomophagous insects. No. 13. Bulletin Section Regionale Ouest Palaearctique, Organisation Internationale de Lutte Biologique, 20: 1–25.Google Scholar
Williams, I.H. 2003. Parasitoids of cabbage seed weevil. In Biocontrol of oilseed rape pests. Edited by Alford, D.V.. Blackwell Science, Oxford, United Kingdom. pp. 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittenberg, R.Cock, M.J.W. 2001. Invasive alien species: a toolkit of best prevention and management practices. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, United Kingdom.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, M.G.Hoffmann, M.P.Kuhar, T.P.Gardner, J.Pitcher, S.A. 2005. Evaluating risks of biological control introductions: a probabilistic risk-assessment approach. Biological Control, 35: 338–347. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar