Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:17:40.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MECHANISMS DETERMINING THE RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF BRINE FLIES (DIPTERA: EPHYDRIDAE) IN YELLOWSTONE THERMAL SPRING EFFLUENTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Nicholas C. Collins
Nicholas C. Collins
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Erindale College, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Of the three large ephydrid flies of Yellowstone’s thermal springs, Ephydra thermophila numerically dominates acidic springs because only it can tolerate their water. Alkaline spring effluents are shared by Ephydra bruesi and Paracoenia turbida. E. bruesi is excluded from alkaline high productivity springs, probably because its larval maturation time is long, relative to the short life of patches of larval habitat. Consequently, such springs support only P. turbida. Proportions of the two species in alkaline low-productivity springs are apparently determined by the proportions of available larval food occurring in still versus flowing water. P. turbida is superior in still water, and E. bruesi wins in flowing water. The analysis leads to predictions (i) that E. bruesi should be relatively abundant in low-productivity springs with pulsating flows, and (ii) that E. bruesi adults should prefer ovipositing in low-productivity effluents, while P. turbida adults should be less particular.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 109 , Issue 3 , March 1977 , pp. 415 - 422
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, J. M. 1912. The biology of some western species of the dipterous genus Ephydra. Jl. N.Y. ent. Soc. 20: 77–93.Google Scholar
Bradbury, J. P. 1971. Limnology of Zuni Salt Lake, New Mexico. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 82: 379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, J. D. and Brock, M. L.. 1968. Life in a hot water basin. Natur. Hist. 77: 47–54.Google Scholar
Brock, M. L., Wiegert, R. G., and Brock, T. D.. 1969. Feeding by Paracoenia and Ephydra (Diptera: Ephydridae) on the microorganisms of hot springs. Ecology 50: 192–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, N. C., Mitchell, R., and Wiegert, R. G.. Functional analysis of a thermal spring ecosystem, with an evaluation of the role of consumers. Ecology in press.Google Scholar
Fraleigh, P. C. and Wiegert, R. G.. 1975. A model explaining successional change in standing crop of thermal blue-green algae. Ecology 56: 656–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, V. 1963. Brine fly studies. Publ. 13, Atmospheric Sci. Res. Ctr., State U New York, Albany.Google Scholar
Water Information Center. 1973. Water Atlas of the United States. Port Washington, N.Y.Google Scholar
Wiegert, R. G. 1973. A general ecological model and its use in simulating algal-fly energetics in a thermal spring community, pp. 85–102. In Geier, P. W., Clark, L. R., Anderson, D. J., and Nix, H. A. (Eds.), Insects: studies in population management. Mem. ecol. Soc. Aust. (Canberra) 1.Google Scholar
Wiegert, R. G. and Fraleigh, P. C.. 1972. Ecology of Yellowstone thermal effluent systems: net primary production and species diversity of a successional blue-green algal mat. Limnol. Oceanogr. 12: 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiegert, R. G. and Mitchell, R.. 1973. Ecology of Yellowstone thermal effluent systems: Intersects of blue-green algae, grazing flies (Paracoenia, Ephydridae) and water mites (Partnuniella, Hydrachnellae). Hydrobiologia 41: 251–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirth, W. W. 1971. The brine flies of the genus Ephydra in North America (Diptera: Ephydridae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 357–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar