Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:52:35.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nomenclature of African Psilini (Hymenoptera: Diapriidae) and status of Coptera robustior, a parasitoid of Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Matthew J. Yoder  and
Robert A. Wharton
Matthew J. Yoder*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States 77843-247
Robert A. Wharton
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States 77843-247
*
1 Corresponding author (e-mail: mjyoder@tamu.edu).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The African psiline Coptera silvestrii var. robustior (Silvestri) is elevated to species status. Both males and females of it and of Coptera silvestrii silvestrii (Kieffer) are redescribed. Lectotypes for both species arc designated. Coptera magnificus (Nixon) is recognized as a junior subjective synonym of C. robustior (new status). The status of Coptera silvestrii nigricornis (Nixon) is reviewed. Six additional psiline species, all originally described in the genus Galesus Haliday, are transferred to the genus Coptrera Say, where they form the following new combinations:Coptera elgoni (Risbec. 1950): Coptera macrophtalma (Risbec, 1950); Coptera ornata (Risbec, 1950); Coptera microphtalma (Risbec, 1950); Coptera bignonae (Risbec, 1954); and Coptera toboi (Risbec, 1954).

Résumé

Le psiliné africain Coptera silvestrii var. robustior (Silvestri) est promu au rang d'espèce. On trouvera ici une nouvelle description des mâles et des femelles, de même que des mâles et des femelles de Coptera silvestrii silvestrii (Kieffer). Des lectotypes des deux espèces ont été choisis. Coptera magnificus (Nixon) est reconnu comme synonyme subjectif récent de C. robustior (nouveau statut). Le statut de Coptera silvestrii nigricornis (Nixon) est révisé. Six espèces additionnelles de Psilini, toutes décrites dans le genre Galesus Haliday, sont transférées au genre Coptera Say, où elles forment de nouvelles combinaisons : Coptera eigoni (Risbec, 1950); Coptera macrophtalma (Risbec, 1950); Coptera ornata (Risbec, 1950); Coptera microphtalma (Risbec, 1950); Coptera bignonae (Risbec, 1954) et Coptera toboi (Risbec, 1954).

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 134 , Issue 5 , October 2002 , pp. 561 - 576
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clausen, C.P., Clancy, D.W., and Chock, Q.C. 1965. Biological control of the Oriental fruit fly (Dacus dorsalis Hendel) and other fruit flies in Hawaii. US Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 1332: 1–102Google Scholar
Gauld, I., Bolton, B. (Editors). 1988. The Hymenoptera. London: British Museum (Natural History) and Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
ICZN. 1999. International code of zoological nomenclature. 4th edition. London: The International Trust for Zoological NomenclatureGoogle Scholar
Isidoro, N., Bin, F., Colazza, S., Vinson, S.B. 1996. Morphology of antennal gustatory sensilla and glands in some parasitoid Hymenoptera with hypothesis on their role in sex and host recognition. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 5: 206–39Google Scholar
Johnson, N.F. 1992. Catalog of world species of Proctotrupoidea, exclusive of Platygastridae (Hymenoptera). Volume 51. Nashville, Tennessee: Associated Publishers GroupGoogle Scholar
Kieffer, J.J. 1913. Deux nouveaux Diapriides d'Afrique. Bollettino del Laboratorio di Zoologia Generale e Agraria della Reale Scuola Superiore d'Agricoltura Portici 7: 91–2Google Scholar
Kieffer, J.J. 1916. Diapriidae. Das Tierreich. Volume 44. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & CoGoogle Scholar
Masner, L. 1965. The types of Proctotrupoidea (Hymenoptera) in the British Museum (Natural History) and in the Hope Department of Entomology, Oxford. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Entomology Supplement 1Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1991. Revision of Spilomicrus Westwood in America north of Mexico (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea, Diapriidae). The Canadian Entomologist 123: 107–77Google Scholar
Masner, L., García, J.L. 2002. The genera of Diapriinae (Hymenoptera: Diapriidae) in the new world. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 268Google Scholar
Menezes, E., Sivinski, J., Holler, T., Aluja, M., Jeronimo, F., Ramirez, E. 1998. Development of Coptera haywardi (Hymenoptera: Diapriidae) in irradiated and unirradiated pupae of the Caribbean fruit fly and the Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Florida Entomologist: 81: 567–70Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W. 1980. The Nearctic parasitic wasps of the genera Psilus Panzer and Coptera Say (Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea, Diapriidae). US Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 71Google Scholar
Nixon, G.E. 1930. The Ethiopian representatives of the genus Galesus (Proctotrupoidea), with descriptions of new species. Annals and Magazine of Natural History. 10: 399–414Google Scholar
Nixon, G.E. 1957. Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea, Diapriidae, subfamily Belytinae. Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects 8Google Scholar
Risbec, J. 1950. Contribution à l'étude des Proctotrupidae (Serphiidae). Proctotrupides de la Section technique d'Agriculture tropicale (A.O.F.) et Proctotrupidés du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (Afrique et Colonies françaises). Travaux du Laboratoire d'Entomologie du Secteur Soudanais de Recherches Agronomiques part II. pp 511–639Google Scholar
Risbec, J. 1953. Chalcidoïdes et Proctotrupoïdes de l'Afrique occidentale française. Bulletin de l'Institut Francaise d'Afrique Noire 15: 548–609Google Scholar
Risbec, J. 1954. Chalcidoides et Proctotrupides de l'Afrique occidentale francaise. (3e Supplement). Bulletin de l'Institut Francaise d'Afrique Noire 16: 524–52Google Scholar
Risbec, J. 1955. Diapriinae et Ceraphroninae de Madagascar. Revue Francaise d'Entomologie 22: 205–21Google Scholar
Silvestri, 1913. Viaggio in Africa per cercare parassiti di mosche dei frutti. Bollettino del Laboratorio di Zoologia Generale e Agraria della Reale Scuola Superiore d'Agricoltura Portici 8: 1–164Google Scholar
Silvestri, 1914. Report of an expedition to Africa in search of the natural enemies of fruit flies (Trypaneidae), with descriptions, observations and biological notes. Bulletin of the Division of Entomology, Board of Commissioners of Agriculture and Forestry, Hawaii 3: 1–176Google Scholar
Sundholm, A. 1970. Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea. South African Animal Life 14: 305–401 [B Hanström, P Brinck, G Rudebeck (Eds). Uppsala, Sweden: Almquist & Wiksells]Google Scholar
Wharton, R.A., Trostle, M.K., Messing, R.H., Copeland, R.S., Kimani-Njogu, S.W., Lux, S., Overholt, W.A., Mohamed, S., Sivinski, J. 2000. Parasitoids of medfly, Ceratitis capitata, and related tephritids in Kenyan coffee: a predominantly koinobiont assemblage. Bulletin of Entomological Research 90: 517–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar