Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T05:29:43.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Key indicators of overcrowding in Canadian emergency departments: a Delphi study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Maria B. Ospina ,
Kenneth Bond ,
Michael Schull ,
Grant Innes ,
Sandra Blitz  and
Brian H. Rowe
Maria B. Ospina
Affiliation:
University of Alberta Evidence-Based Practice Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
Kenneth Bond
Affiliation:
University of Alberta Evidence-Based Practice Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
Michael Schull
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Toronto and Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ont.
Grant Innes
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Providence Health Care, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC
Sandra Blitz
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
Brian H. Rowe*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
*
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, 1G1.43 WMC, 8440-112 St., Edmonton AB T6G 2B7; brian.rowe@ualberta.ca

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To identify the level of consensus among a group of Canadian emergency department (ED) experts on the importance of a set of indicators to document ED overcrowding.

Methods:

A 2-round Delphi survey was conducted from February 2005 to April 2005, with a multi-disciplinary group of 38 Canadian experts in various aspects of ED operations who rated the relevance of 36 measures and ranked their relative importance as indicators of ED overcrowding.

Results:

The response rates for the first and second rounds were 84% and 87%, respectively. The most important indicator identified by the experts was the percentage of the ED occupied by in-patients (mean on a 7-point Likert-type scale 6.53, standard deviation [SD] 0.80). The other 9 indicators, in order of the importance attributed, were the total number of ED patients (mean 6.35, SD 0.75), the total time in the ED (mean 6.16, SD 1.04), the percentage of time that the ED was at or above capacity (mean 6.16, SD 1.08), the overall bed occupancy (mean 6.19, SD 0.93), the time from bed request to bed assignment (mean 6.06, SD 1.08), the time from triage to care (mean 5.84, SD 1.08) the physician satisfaction (mean 5.84, SD 1.22), the time from bed availability to ward transfer (mean 5.53, SD 1.72) and the number of staffed acute care beds (mean 5.53, SD 1.57).

Conclusion:

Ten clinically important measures were prioritized by the participants as relevant indicators of ED overcrowding. Indicators derived from consensus techniques have face validity, but their metric properties must be tested to ensure their effectiveness for identifying ED overcrowding in different settings.

Keywords

crowdingovercrowdingemergency medicinehealth services accessibilityDelphi technique
Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 9 , Issue 5 , September 2007 , pp. 339 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2007

References

1. Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians / National Emergency Nurses Affiliation. Joint position statement: access to acute care in the setting of emergency department overcrowding. Can J Emerg Med 2003;5:81–6.Google Scholar
2. Rowe, BH, Bond, K, Ospina, MB, et al. Frequency, determinants, and impact of emergency department overcrowding in Canada. [Technology Report No. 67.3]. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2006.Google Scholar
3. Hwang, U, Concato, J. Care in the emergency department: How crowded is overcrowded? Acad Emerg Med 2004;11:1097–101.Google Scholar
4. Solberg, LI, Asplin, BR, Weinick, RM, et al. Emergency department crowding: consensus development of potential measures. Ann Emerg Med 2003;42:824–34.Google Scholar
5. Schull, MJ, Slaughter, PM, Redelmeier, DA. Urban emergency department overcrowding: defining the problem and eliminating misconceptions. Can J Emerg Med 2002;4:76–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Weiss, SJ, Derlet, R, Arndahl, J, et al. Estimating the degree of emergency department overcrowding in academic medical centers: results of the National ED Overcrowding Study (NEDOCS). Acad Emerg Med 2004;11:38–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Derlet, RW, Weiss, SJ, Ernst, AA, et al. Development of an emergency department overcrowding scale. Results of the national ED overcrowding study (NEDOCS). Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:366.Google Scholar
8. Reeder, TJ, Burleson, DL, Garrison, HG. The overcrowded emergency department: a comparison of staff perceptions. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10:1059–64.Google Scholar
9. Bernstein, SL, Verghese, V, Leung, W, et al. Development and validation of a new index to measure emergency department crowding. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10:938–42.Google Scholar
10. Crisp, J, Pelletier, D, Duffield, C, et al. The Delphi method? Nurs Res 1997;46:116–8.Google Scholar
11. Broomfield, D, Humphries, GM. Using the Delphi technique to identify the cancer education requirements of general practitioners. Med Educ 2001;35:928–37.Google Scholar
12. Beattie, E, Mackway-Jones, K. A Delphi study to identify performance indicators for emergency medicine. Emerg Med J 2004;21:47–50.Google Scholar
13. Taylor, WJ. Preliminary identification of core domains for outcome studies in psoriatic arthritis using Delphi methods. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64(Suppl 2):ii110–22.Google Scholar
14. Graff, L. Overcrowding in the ED: an international symptom of health care system failure. Am J Emerg Med 1999;17:208–99.Google Scholar
15. Asplin, BR, Magid, DJ, Rhodes, KV, et al. A conceptual model of emergency department crowding. Ann Emerg Med 2003;42:173–80.Google Scholar
16. Fatovich, DM. Emergency medicine. BMJ 2002;324:958–62.Google Scholar
17. Australasian College for Emergency Medicine. Access block and overcrowding in emergency departments. 2004. p 1–22. Available: http://www.acem.org.au/media/Access_Block1.pdf (accessed 2007 Mar 7).Google Scholar
18. Australasian College for Emergency Medicine. The relationship between emergency department overcrowding and alternative after-hours GP services. West Melbourne: The College; 2004. Available: http://www.medeserv.com.au/acem/open/documents/after_hoursgp.pdf (accessed 2007 Mar 7).Google Scholar
19. Fatovich, DM, Nagree, Y, Sprivulis, P. Access block causes emergency department overcrowding and ambulance diversion in Perth, Western Australia. Emerg Med J 2005;22:351–4.Google Scholar
20. Falvo, T, Grove, L, Stachura, R, et al. The opportunity loss of boarding admitted patients in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2007;14:332–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Reeder, TJ, Tucker, JL, Cascio, ES, et al. Trends in emergency department utilization. Effect of changing demographics. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8:577.Google Scholar
22. Richardson, DB. A new definition of emergency department overcrowding using point occupancy. Acad Emerg Med 2004;11:462.Google Scholar
23. Estey, A, Ness, K, Saunders, LD, et al. Understanding the causes of overcrowding in emergency departments in the Capital Health Region in Alberta: a focus group study. Can J Emerg Med 2003;5:87–94.Google Scholar
24. Cameron, PA, Campbell, DA. Responses to access block in Australia: Royal Melbourne Hospital. Med J Aust 2003;178:109–10.Google Scholar
25. Richardson, DB. Prospective validation of point occupancy definition of overcrowding. Acad Emerg Med 2004;11:462–3.Google Scholar
26. Locker, TE, Mason, SM. Analysis of the distribution of time that patients spend in emergency departments. BMJ 2005;330:1188–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Alberti, G. Transforming Emergency Care in England. COI Communications for the Department of Health, United Kingdom; 2004. Available: http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/09/17/81/04091781.pdf (accessed 2007 Mar 7).Google Scholar
28. NHS Modernisation Agency. Emergency services collaborative. improvements in emergency care: case studies. NHS Modernisation Agency; 2002. Available: http://www.modern.nhs.uk/esc/8237/Case%20Studies%20%20Low%20Res%20.pdf (accessed 2007 Mar 7).Google Scholar
29. General Accounting Office. Hospital emergency departments: crowded conditions vary among hospitals and communities. Washington (DC): The Office; 2003.Google Scholar
30. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Hospital-based emergency care: at the breaking point. Washington (DC): The Institute; 2006. Available:http://www.iom.edu/CMS/3809/16107/35007.aspx (accessed 2007 Mar 7).Google Scholar
31. Weiss, SJ, Arndahl, J, Ernst, AA, et al. Development of a site sampling form for evaluation of ED overcrowding. Med Sci Monit 2002;8:549–53.Google Scholar
32. Schull, MJ, Lazier, K, Vermeulen, M, et al. Emergency department contributors to ambulance diversion: a quantitative analysis. Ann Emerg Med 2003;41:467–76.Google Scholar
33. Asplin, BR. Measuring overcrowding: time for a paradigm shift. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:459–61.Google Scholar
34. Hasson, F, Keeney, S, McKenna, H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 2000;32:1008–15.Google Scholar
35. Rowe, G, Wright, G, Bolger, F. Delphi: a re-evaluation of research and theory. Technol Forecast Soc Change 1991;39:235–51.Google Scholar
36. Harris, DR, Connolly, H, Christenson, J, et al. Pitfalls of email survey research. Can J Emerg Med 2003;5(3). Available: http://caep.ca/template.asp?id=E6946BBBF1804F4AAEF600DAF7F37B63#079 (accessed 2007 Mar 7).Google Scholar
37. Rowe, BH, Bond, K, Ospina, MB, et al. Data collection on patients in emergency departments in Canada. Can J Emerg Med 2006;8:417–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38. Beveridge, R, Clarke, B, Janes, L, et al. Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale: implementation guidelines. Can J Emerg Med 1999;1(Suppl 3). Available: http://www.caep.ca. Google Scholar