Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T10:11:30.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P058: Impact of an early mobilization protocol on outcomes in trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2019

J. Coles
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University; Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre; Trauma Nova Scotia, Halifax, NS
M. Erdogan
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University; Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre; Trauma Nova Scotia, Halifax, NS
S. Higgins
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University; Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre; Trauma Nova Scotia, Halifax, NS
R. Green*
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University; Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre; Trauma Nova Scotia, Halifax, NS

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introduction: Long-term immobility has detrimental effects for critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) including ICU-acquired weakness. Early mobilization of patients admitted to ICU has been demonstrated to be a safe, feasible and effective strategy to improve patient outcomes. The optimal mobilization of trauma ICU patients has not been extensively studied. Our objective was to determine the impact of an early mobilization protocol on outcomes among trauma patients admitted to the ICU. Methods: We analyzed all adult trauma patients ( > 18 years old) admitted to ICU over a 2-year period prior to and following implementation of an early mobilization protocol, allowing for a 1-year transition period. Data were collected from the Nova Scotia Trauma Registry. We compared patient characteristics and outcomes (mortality, length of stay [LOS], ventilator days) between the pre- and post-implementation groups. Associations between early mobilization and clinical outcomes were estimated using binary and linear regression models. Results: Overall, there were 526 patients included in the analysis (292 pre-implementation, 234 post-implementation). The study population ranged in age from 18 to 92 years (mean age 49.0 ± 20.4 years) and 74.3% of all patients were male. The pre- and post-implementation groups were similar in age, sex, and injury severity. In-hospital mortality was reduced in the post-implementation group (25.3% vs. 17.5%; p = 0.031). In addition, there was a reduction in ICU mortality in the post-implementation group (21.6% vs. 12.8%; p = 0.009). We did not observe any difference in overall hospital LOS, ICU LOS, or ventilator days between the two groups. Compared to the pre-implementation period, trauma patients admitted to the ICU following protocol implementation were less likely to die in-hospital (OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.30-0.91; p = 0.021) or in the ICU (OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.21- 0.76, p = 0.005). Results were similar following a sensitivity analysis limited to patients with blunt or penetrating injuries. There was no difference between the pre- and post-implementation groups with respect to in-hospital LOS, ICU LOS, or the number of ventilator days. Conclusion: We found that trauma patients admitted to ICU during the post-implementation period had decreased odds of in-hospital mortality and ICU mortality. Ours is the first study to demonstrate a significant reduction in trauma mortality following implementation of an ICU mobility protocol.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2019