Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:27:48.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The power of negative thinking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Jacques Lee*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Sunnybrook and Women’s Research Institute, Toronto, Ont.; EM Advances section, CJEM
*
Emergency Medicine Research Program, Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave., BG-04, Toronto ON M4N 3M5

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentary • Commentaire
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2004

References

1.Frank, LR, Olson, CM, Shuler, KB, Gharib, SF.Intravenous magnesium for acute benign headache in the emergency department: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Can J Emerg Med 2004;6(5):32732.Google Scholar
2.Moscati, R, Jehle, D, Ellis, D, Fiorello, A, Landi, M.Positive-outcome bias: comparison of emergency medicine and general medicine literatures. Acad Emerg Med 1994;1(3):26771.Google Scholar
3.Callaham, ML, Wears, RL, Weber, EJ, Barton, C, Young, G.Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. JAMA 1998; 280(3):2547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Fontanarosa, PB, Glass, RM, DeAngelis, CD.Thanking authors, peer reviewers, and readers — constancy in a time of change. JAMA 2000;283(15):20167.Google Scholar
5.Crandall, R.Editorial responsibilities in manuscript review. Behavioral Brain Sci 1982;5:2078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Todd, KH, Funk, JP.The minimum clinically important difference in physician-assigned visual analog scores. Acad Emerg Med 1996;3:1426.Google Scholar
7.Lee, JS, Hobden, E, Stiell, IG, Wells, GA.Clinically important change in the visual analog scale after adequate pain control. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10(10):112830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Mauskop, A, Altura, BT, Cracco, RQ, Altura, BM.Intravenous magnesium sulphate relieves migraine attacks in patients with low serum ionized magnesium levels: a pilot study. Clin Sci (Lond) 1995;89(6):6336.Google Scholar
9.Mauskop, A, Altura, BT, Cracco, RQ, Altura, BM.Intravenous magnesium sulfate rapidly alleviates headaches of various types. Headache 1996;36(3):15460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Demirkaya, S, Vural, O, Dora, B, Topcuoglu, MA.Efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute migraine attacks. Headache 2001;41(2):1717.Google Scholar
11.Bigal, ME, Bordini, CA, Tepper, SJ, Speciali, JG.Intravenous magnesium sulphate in the acute treatment of migraine without aura and migraine with aura. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia 2002;22(5):34553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Corbo, J, Esses, D, Bijur, PE, Iannaccone, R, Gallagher, EJ.Randomized clinical trial of intravenous magnesium sulfate as an adjunctive medication for emergency department treatment of migraine headache. Ann Emerg Med 2001;38(6):6217.Google Scholar
13.Rosenthal, R.The “file drawer problem” and tolerances of null results. Psych Bull 1979;86:63841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Dickersin, K, Chan, S, Chalmers, TC, Sacks, HS, Smith, H Jr.Publication bias and clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1987;8(4): 34353.Google Scholar
15.Dickersin, K.How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data. AIDS Educ Prev 1997;9(1 Suppl):1521.Google Scholar
16.Olson, CM, Rennie, D, Cook, D, Dickersin, K, Flanagin, A, Hogan, JW, et al. Publication bias in editorial decision making. JAMA 2002;287(21):28258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Dickersin, K, Rennie, D.Registering clinical trials. JAMA 2003; 290(4):51623.Google Scholar
18.Moore, T.Deadly medicine: why tens of thousands of heart patients died in America’s worst drug disaster. New York: Simon & Shuster; 1995.Google Scholar
19.Chalmers, I.Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. JAMA 1990;263(10):14058.Google Scholar